Advertisement

Factors in the Acceptance of Enterprise Content Management Systems

  • Laurent Wiltzius
  • Alexander Simons
  • Stefan Seidel
  • Jan vom BrockeEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Progress in IS book series (PROIS)

Abstract

This chapter investigates the factors that influence the acceptance of enterprise content management (ECM) systems. Specifically, we identify and explain twenty-two factors at the enterprise, process, technology, and content levels that can influence ECM success. Our study builds on the technology acceptance model (TAM), and the results are grounded in both a systematic review of the literature on ECM, including related fields like document management and records management, and an analysis of qualitative data collected from five organizations. Practitioners can use the results in planning and conducting ECM programs, and the results can also inform future Information Systems (IS) research on ECM acceptance and contribute to the emergence of ECM as an important field in IS research.

Keywords

Information System Content Management Technology Acceptance Model Document Management Content Management System 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

This article is an extension and revision of a paper originally presented at the 10th International Conference on Wirtschaftsinformatik (WI 2011) in Zurich, Switzerland (Wiltzius et al. 2011). The authors thank the anonymous interviewees who assisted them in this research and the reviewers from WI 2011 for their constructive comments on earlier versions of the article.

References

  1. Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  2. Alalwan, J. A., & Weistroffer, H. R. (2012). Enterprise content management research: A comprehensive review. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 25(5), 441–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Allen, D. (2007). Cost/benefit analysis for implementing ECM, BPM systems. Information Management Journal, 41(3), 34–41.Google Scholar
  4. Amoako-Gyampah, K. (2007). Perceived usefulness, user involvement and behavioral intention: An empirical study of ERP implementation. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(3), 1232–1248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Amoako-Gyampah, K., & Salam, A. F. (2004). An extension of the technology acceptance model in an ERP implementation environment. Information & Management, 41(6), 731–745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Andersen, R. (2007). The rhetoric of enterprise content management (ECM): Confronting the assumptions driving ECM adoption and transforming technical communication. Technical Communication Quarterly, 17(1), 61–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Association for Information and Image Management. (2011). What is enterprise content management (ECM)? Retrieved July 5, 2011, from http://www.aiim.org/What-is-ECM-Enterprise-Content-Management
  8. Bals, C., Smolnik, S., & Riempp, G. (2007). Assessing user acceptance of a knowledge management system in a global bank: Process analysis and concept development. In Proceedings of the 40th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Big Island, HI.Google Scholar
  9. Blair, B. T. (2004). An enterprise content management primer. Information Management Journal, 38(5), 64–66.Google Scholar
  10. Bridges, J. D. (2007). Taking ECM from concept to reality. Information Management Journal, 41(6), 30–39.Google Scholar
  11. Bueno, S., & Salmeron, J. L. (2008). TAM-based success modeling in ERP. Interacting with Computers, 20(6), 515–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Caldwell, F. (2006). The new enterprise knowledge management. VINE, 36(2), 182–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Calisir, F., & Calisir, F. (2004). The relation of interface usability characteristics, perceived usefulness, and perceived ease of use to end-user satisfaction with enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems. Computers in Human Behavior, 20(4), 505–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chambers, B. (2007). BPM: How does it fit into an ECM strategy? AIIM E-Doc, 21(2), 36–39.Google Scholar
  15. Chiu, D. K. W., & Hung, P. C. K. (2005). Privacy and access control issues in financial enterprise content management. In Proceedings of the 38th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Big Island, HI.Google Scholar
  16. Conry-Murray, A. (2008). Content, content everywhere. InformationWeek, 1215, 24–31.Google Scholar
  17. Davis, F. D. (1986). A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: Theory and results. Doctoral dissertation, Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
  18. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982–1003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dhérent, C. (2006). Document management at the French National Library. Records Management Journal, 16(2), 97–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Di Biagio, M. L., & Ibiricu, B. (2008). A balancing act: Learning lessons and adapting approaches whilst rolling out an EDRMS. Records Management Journal, 18(3), 170–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Downing, L. (2006). Implementing EDMS: Putting people first. Information Management Journal, 40(4), 44–50.Google Scholar
  23. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behaviour: An introduction to theory and research. Reading: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  24. Garrido, B. G. (2008). Organising electronic documents: The user perspective—a case study at the European Central Bank. Records Management Journal, 18(3), 180–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gilchrist, A. (2001). Corporate taxonomies: Report on a survey of current practice. Online Information Review, 25(2), 94–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Grahlmann, K. R., Helms, R. W., Hilhorst, C., Brinkkemper, S., & van Amerongen, S. (2011). Reviewing enterprise content management: A functional framework. European Journal of Information Systems, 21(3), 268–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Grudman, R. (2008). Mapping an approach for successful content management. Information Management Journal, 42(5), 60–64.Google Scholar
  28. Hung, S.-Y., Tang, K.-Z., Chang, C.-M., & Ke, C.-D. (2009). User acceptance of intergovernmental services: An example of electronic document management system. Government Information Quarterly, 26(2), 387–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. IEEE Computer Society. (1991). IEEE standard computer dictionary: A compilation of IEEE standard computer glossaries. New York: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers.Google Scholar
  30. Johnston, G. P., & Bowen, D. V. (2005). The benefits of electronic records management systems: A general review of published and some unpublished cases. Records Management Journal, 15(3), 131–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Jones, P. (2008). The role of virtual folders in developing an electronic document and records management system: Meeting user and records management needs. Records Management Journal, 18(1), 53–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lee, Y., Lozar, K. A., & Larsen, K. R. T. (2003). The technology acceptance model: Past, present, and future. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 12(1), 752–780.Google Scholar
  33. Legris, P., Ingham, J., & Collerette, P. (2003). Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model. Information & Management, 40(3), 191–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Maguire, R. (2005). Lessons learned from implementing an electronic records management system. Records Management Journal, 15(3), 150–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Munkvold, B. E., Päivärinta, T., Hodne, A. K., & Stangeland, E. (2006). Contemporary issues of enterprise content management: The case of Statoil. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 18(2), 69–100.Google Scholar
  36. Neumann, J. (2007). The next step: Simplifying DAM. Journal of Digital Asset Management, 3(3), 150–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Nordheim, S., & Päivärinta, T. (2004). Customization of enterprise content management systems: An exploratory case study. In Proceedings of the 37th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Big Island, HI.Google Scholar
  38. Nordheim, S., & Päivärinta, T. (2006). Implementing enterprise content management: From evolution through strategy to contradictions out-of-the-box. European Journal of Information Systems, 15(6), 648–662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. O’Callaghan, R., & Smits, M. (2005). A strategy development process for enterprise content management. In Proceedings of the 13th European Conference on Information Systems (pp. 1271–1282). Regensburg.Google Scholar
  40. Päivärinta, T., & Munkvold, B. E. (2005). Enterprise content management: An integrated perspective on information management. In Proceedings of the 38th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Big Island, HI.Google Scholar
  41. Pullman, G., & Gu, B. (2007). Guest editors’ introduction: Rationalizing and rhetoricizing content management. Technical Communication Quarterly, 17(1), 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Real Story Group. (2010). Document and Records Management (ECM) Vendors. Retrieved Oct 7, 2010, from http://www.realstorygroup.com/Research/Channel/ECM/Vendors
  43. Remington, T. (2006). If you build it, will they come? Not unless you make it so they want to! Journal of Digital Asset Management, 2(3/4), 203–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Rickenberg, T., Neumann, M., Hohler, B., & Breitner, M. (2012). Enterprise content management: A literature review. In Proceedings of the 18th Americas Conference on Information Systems. Seattle, WA.Google Scholar
  45. Rockley, A., Kostur, P., & Manning, S. (2003). Managing enterprise content: A unified content strategy. Indianapolis: New Riders.Google Scholar
  46. Schaffel, B. (2006). Using DAM to drive workflow: A concept for transforming information into knowledge. Journal of Digital Asset Management, 2(3/4), 129–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Scheepers, R. (2006). A conceptual framework for the implementation of enterprise information portals in large organizations. European Journal of Information Systems, 15(6), 635–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Scheer, C. (2007). Factors to consider before building your own DAM. Journal of Digital Asset Management, 3(1), 17–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Scott, J., Globe, A., & Schiffner, K. (2004). Jungles and gardens: The evolution of knowledge management at J.D. Edwards. Management Information Systems Quarterly Executive, 3(1), 37–52.Google Scholar
  50. Shaw, D., & Edwards, J. S. (2005). Building user commitment to implementing a knowledge management strategy. Information & Management, 42(7), 977–988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Slawsky, D. (2007). Building a keyword library for description of visual assets: Thesaurus basics. Journal of Digital Asset Management, 3(3), 130–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Smith, H. A., & McKeen, J. D. (2003). Developments in practice VIII: Enterprise content management. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 11(1), 647–659.Google Scholar
  53. Smyth, Z. A. (2005). Implementing EDRM: Has it provided the benefits expected? Records Management Journal, 15(3), 141–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Sprehe, J. T. (2005). The positive benefits of electronic records management in the context of enterprise content management. Government Information Quarterly, 22(2), 297–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Stevens, D. (2006). How Agfa implemented a DAM solution. Journal of Digital Asset Management, 2(2), 119–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Straub, D., Keil, M., & Brenner, W. (1997). Testing the technology acceptance model across cultures: A three country study. Information & Management, 33(1), 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Tyrväinen, P., Päivärinta, T., Salminen, A., & Iivari, J. (2006). Guest editorial: Characterizing the evolving research on enterprise content management. European Journal of Information Systems, 15(6), 627–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. vom Brocke, J., Seidel, S., & Simons, A. (2010). Bridging the gap between enterprise content management and creativity: A research framework. In Proceedings of the 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Kauai, HI.Google Scholar
  59. vom Brocke, J., Simons, A., & Cleven, A. (2011a). Towards a business process-oriented approach to enterprise content management: The ECM-Blueprinting framework. Information Systems and e-Business Management, 9(4), 475–496.Google Scholar
  60. vom Brocke, J., Simons, A., Herbst, A., Derungs, R., & Novotny, S. (2011b). The business drivers behind ECM initiatives: A process perspective. Business Process Management Journal, 17(6), 965–985.Google Scholar
  61. Wager, S. (2005). Digital asset management, media asset management, and content management: From confusion to clarity. Journal of Digital Asset Management, 1(1), 40–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Watson, J., Patel, J., Desai, G., & Chambers, B. (2007). ECM in 2008: Compliance takes center stage. AIIM E-Doc, 21(6), 42–45.Google Scholar
  63. Watts, R. (2005). Lubrizol’s experiences with DAM. Journal of Digital Asset Management, 1(3), 178–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Williams, D. J. (2005). EDRM implementation at the National Weights and Measures Laboratory. Records Management Journal, 15(3), 158–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Wiltzius, L., Simons, A., & Seidel, S. (2011). A study on the acceptance of ECM systems. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Wirtschaftsinformatik. Zurich, Switzerland.Google Scholar
  66. Xu, J., & Quaddus, M. (2007). Exploring the factors influencing end users’ acceptance of knowledge management systems: Development of a research model of adoption and continued use. Journal of Organizational and End User Computing, 19(4), 57–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Laurent Wiltzius
    • 1
  • Alexander Simons
    • 2
  • Stefan Seidel
    • 2
  • Jan vom Brocke
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.Process Excellence CentreEnovos International S.A.Esch-sur-AlzetteLuxembourg
  2. 2.Institute of Information SystemsUniversity of LiechtensteinVaduzLiechtenstein

Personalised recommendations