Skip to main content

RIO: Minimizing User Interaction in Ontology Debugging

  • Conference paper
Web Reasoning and Rule Systems (RR 2013)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 7994))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Efficient ontology debugging is a cornerstone for many activities in the context of the Semantic Web, especially when automatic tools produce (parts of) ontologies such as in the field of ontology matching. The best currently known interactive debugging systems rely upon some meta information in terms of fault probabilities, which can speed up the debugging procedure in the good case, but can also have negative impact on the performance in the bad case. The problem is that assessment of the meta information is only possible a-posteriori. Consequently, as long as the actual fault is unknown, there is always some risk of suboptimal interactive diagnoses discrimination. As an alternative, one might prefer to rely on a tool which pursues a no-risk strategy. In this case, however, possibly well-chosen meta information cannot be exploited, resulting again in inefficient debugging actions. In this work we present a reinforcement learning strategy that continuously adapts its behavior depending on the performance achieved and minimizes the risk of using low-quality meta information. Therefore, this method is suitable for application scenarios where reliable a-priori fault estimates are difficult to obtain. Using a corpus of incoherent real-world ontologies from the field of ontology matching, we show that the proposed risk-aware query strategy outperforms both meta information based approaches and no-risk strategies on average in terms of required amount of user interaction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baader, F., Calvanese, D., McGuinness, D., Nardi, D., Patel-Schneider, P. (eds.): The Description Logic Handbook: Theory, Implementation, Applications. Cambridge Press (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Friedrich, G., Shchekotykhin, K.: A General Diagnosis Method for Ontologies. In: Gil, Y., Motta, E., Benjamins, V.R., Musen, M.A. (eds.) ISWC 2005. LNCS, vol. 3729, pp. 232–246. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Horridge, M., Parsia, B., Sattler, U.: Laconic and Precise Justifications in OWL. In: Sheth, A.P., Staab, S., Dean, M., Paolucci, M., Maynard, D., Finin, T., Thirunarayan, K. (eds.) ISWC 2008. LNCS, vol. 5318, pp. 323–338. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Kalyanpur, A., Parsia, B., Horridge, M., Sirin, E.: Finding all Justifications of OWL DL Entailments. In: Aberer, K., et al. (eds.) ISWC/ASWC 2007. LNCS, vol. 4825, pp. 267–280. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Meilicke, C.: Alignment Incoherence in Ontology Matching. Ph.D. thesis, Universität Mannheim (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Meilicke, C., Stuckenschmidt, H.: An Efficient Method for Computing Alignment Diagnoses. In: Polleres, A., Swift, T. (eds.) RR 2009. LNCS, vol. 5837, pp. 182–196. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Meilicke, C., Stuckenschmidt, H., Tamilin, A.: Reasoning Support for Mapping Revision. Journal of Logic and Computation 19(5), 807–829 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Nikitina, N., Rudolph, S., Glimm, B.: Interactive Ontology Revision. Journal of Web Semantics 49(721) (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Reiter, R.: A Theory of Diagnosis from First Principles. Artif. Intell. 32(1), 57–95 (1987)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Schlobach, S., Huang, Z., Cornet, R., Harmelen, F.: Debugging Incoherent Terminologies. Journal of Automated Reasoning 39(3), 317–349 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Shchekotykhin, K., Friedrich, G., Fleiss, P., Rodler, P.: Interactive ontology debugging: two query strategies for efficient fault localization. Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web 12-13, 88–103 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Shvaiko, P., Euzenat, J.: Ontology matching: State of the art and future challenges. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering X(X), 1–20 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Stuckenschmidt, H.: Debugging OWL Ontologies - A Reality Check. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop on Evaluation of Ontology-Based Tools and the Semantic Web Service Challenge (EON), Tenerife, Spain, pp. 1–12 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Rodler, P., Shchekotykhin, K., Fleiss, P., Friedrich, G. (2013). RIO: Minimizing User Interaction in Ontology Debugging. In: Faber, W., Lembo, D. (eds) Web Reasoning and Rule Systems. RR 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7994. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39666-3_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39666-3_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-39665-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-39666-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics