New Frameworks for Financing and Governance of Loss and Damage

  • Krishna Rao Pinninti Email author
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Climate Studies book series (BRIEFSCLIMATE)


Financing and cost-sharing for compensation mechanisms largely centers around developed countries for their historic contributions even since industrialization started. However, using the UNFCCC charter (see also Muller et al., 2009),especially Article 3.1 which refers to ‘contribution’ ‘respective capabilities’ and ‘common but differentiated responsibilities’, suggests considerable need for precise application of the norms with a good degree of empiricism. This is not a part of this Monograph. Among the estimates of burden sharing offered for financing CCA an estimate of about $100 billion per year has been suggested for supporting CCA (Dellink et al., 2009); it is also suggested that a combination of ability to pay and historical contributions might be relevant, and the per capita burden for compensation in this context among industrial countries ranges $43–82 per year. Suffice it state that if the order of magnitude for compensation for L and D (beyond CCA financing) is about $120 per year the per capita may not be high for the developed countries. These magnitudes and higher levels of support could involve co-financing of insurance coverage and other risk spreading mechanism, concessional transfer of technology that bring in economies of scale, and related measures that promote the businesses in the developed countries as well. Thus a set of win–win strategies are relevant in this context.


Precautionary Principle Burden Sharing International Telecommunication Union Poverty Reduction Strategy Historic Contribution 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Dellink, R., Elzen M den, Aiking H., Bergsma E., Berkhout F., Dekker T., Gupta, J. (2009). Sharing the burden of financing adaptation to climate change. Global Environmental Change. 19, 411–421Google Scholar
  2. IPCC. (2012). Managing the risks of Extreme Events and Disasters to Advance ClimateChange Adaptation. from .
  3. Mueller, B., & Mahadeva, L. (2013). The Oxford Approach: Operationalising the UNFCCC Principle of Respective Capabilities, Report EV 58. Oxford: The Oxford Institute for Energy Studies.Google Scholar
  4. Mueller, B., Hohne, N., & Ellermann, C. (2009). Differentiating (historic) responsibilities for climate change. Climate Policy, 9, 593–611.Google Scholar
  5. Page, E. A. (2008). Distributing the burdens of climate change. Environmental Politics, 17, 556–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Rao, P. K. (2013). Governance of Disaster Reduction. Working Paper, Geneva: UNISDR.Google Scholar
  7. Rao, P. K. (2000). Sustainable Development: Economics and Policy. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  8. UNFCCC. (2007). Report of the Conference of the Parties on its 13 th Session, Bali, December, 2007, Report FCCC/CP/2007/6/Add.1, Bonn: UNFCCC.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.PrincetonUSA

Personalised recommendations