Skip to main content

Introduction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Difficult Psychiatric Consultations

Abstract

Over 60 years ago, the English pediatrician and psychoanalyst Donald W. Winnicott (1896–1971) astutely observed: “There’s no such thing as a baby” (Winnicott 1964/1947). Today, most psychiatrists are keenly aware that there’s no such thing as a “patient”; that is, a patient exists inside an environment that includes their families, the treating physicians, treatment teams, subspecialty consultants, and other clinical providers. In turn, a patient’s interactions with these groups are heavily influenced by their prior experiences, cognitive styles, attachment patterns, temperaments, and most importantly, their cultural backgrounds. Frequently, for most of those in need of aid, treatment is effectively provided and received, and recovery ensues. However, when treatment does not go according to plan, the parties involved can experience anxieties that lead to unexpected negative outcomes. If the patient’s treatment becomes derailed due to their personality or to cognitive problems, the treatment team begins to view the patient as “noncompliant” or “difficult,” and they request a psychiatric consultation. When the patient’s treatment becomes thwarted by family factors, psychiatrists are also asked to provide insight. These consultations may result in recommendations regarding psychopharmacologic strategies for various neuropsychiatric disorders (e.g., delirium, depression secondary to α-interferon therapy, postpartum psychosis) or the clarifying of psychiatric diagnoses. Sometimes, however, clinical consultations are much more complex and fraught—“difficult clinical consultations”—requiring an integrated effort that combines the careful assessment of the patient from a multidimensional perspective (psychodynamic, family, and ethical) with an informed strategy for the treatment team and the patient’s family. In Difficult Psychiatric Consultations: An Integrated Approach, we will describe effective approaches to difficult psychiatric consultations and in doing so will comprehensively discuss issues and impediments related to the patient, the family, and the treatment team. In addition, we’ll explore the ethical and cultural aspects of managing these “difficult consultations.” Our goal in presenting this systematic approach is to facilitate the psychiatric consultant’s work within the larger healthcare system and to provide reliable and usable tools for the consultant who works with complex patients and their treatment teams.

There’s no such thing as a baby

—Donald W. Winnicott (1896–1971)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Beckman HB, Markakis KM, Suchman AL et al (1994) The doctor-patient relationship and malpractice. Lessons from plaintiff depositions. Arch Int Med 154(12):1365–1370

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bronheim HE, Fulop G, Kunkel EJ et al (1998) The academy of psychosomatic medicine practice guidelines for psychiatric consultation in the general medical setting. Psychosomatics 39(4):S8–S30

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dowling AS (2005) George Engel, MD (1913-1999). Am J Psychiatry 162:2039

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Engel G (1977) The need for a new medical model: a challenge for biomedicine. Science 196(4286):129–136

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Engel GL (1980) The clinical application of the biopsychosocial model. Am J Psychiatry 137:535–544

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gabbard GO, Kay J (2001) The fate of integrated treatment: Whatever happened to the biopsychosocial psychiatrist? Am J Psychiatry 158(12):1956–1963

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gitlin DF, Levenson JL, Lyketsos CG (2004) Psychosomatic medicine: a new psychiatric subspecialty. Acad Psychiatry 28(1):4–11

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Halpern J (2007) Empathy in patient-physician conflicts. J Gen Intern Med 22(5):696–700

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton M (1959) The assessment of anxiety states by rating. Br J Med Psychol 32:50–55

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton M (1960) A rating scale for depression. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 23:56–62

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hunter JJ, Maunder RG, Gupta M (2007) Teaching consultation-liaison psychotherapy: assessment of adaptation to medical and surgical illness. Acad Psychiatry 31:367–374

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kazak AE (2001) Comprehensive care for children with cancer and their families: a social ecological framework guiding research, practice, and policy. Child Ser Soc Pol Res Pract 4:217–233

    Google Scholar 

  • Kontos N, Querques J, Freudenreich O (2006) The problem of the psychopharmacologist. Acad Psychiatry 30(3):218–226

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Levenson JL (2002) Psychological factors affecting medical conditions. In: Hales RE, Yudovsky SC, Talbott JA (eds) The American psychiatric press textbook of psychiatry, 4th edn. American Psychiatric Press Incorporated, Washington, DC, pp 631–658

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipowski ZJ (1983) Psychosocial reactions to physical illness. Can Med Assoc J 128:1069–1072

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McIntyre JS (2002) A new subspecialty. Am J Psychiatry 159(12):1961–1963

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rush AJ, Gullion CM, Basco MR et al (1996) The inventory of depressive symptomatology (IDS): psychometric properties. Psychol Med 26:477–486

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schneiderman LJ (2001) Family demand for futile treatment. Med Ethics (Burlingt Mass) 3:8

    Google Scholar 

  • Streltzer J, Hoyle L (2007) Interviewing in consultation-liaison psychiatry. Handbook of consultation-liaison psychiatry. Springer, New York, pp 387–393

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wei MH, Querques J, Stern TA (2011) Teaching trainees about the practice of consultation-liaison psychiatry in the general hospital. Psychiatry Clin North Am 34(3):689–707

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams PD (1997) Siblings and pediatric chronic illness: a review of the literature. Int J Nurs Stud 34:312–323

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Winnicott D (1964/1947) The child, the family, and the outside world. Penguin, Harmondsworth, England

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Delgado, S.V., Strawn, J.R. (2014). Introduction. In: Difficult Psychiatric Consultations. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39552-9_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39552-9_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-39551-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-39552-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics