Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Theory and Decision Library C ((TDLC,volume 45))

  • 919 Accesses

Abstract

Fair division is discussed on the basis of a cooperative oligopoly game without transferable technologies. In a first step an oligopoly situation is introduced from which the corresponding oligopoly game in normal from can be derived. In a second step the associated cooperative games, the so-called α- and β-value games, are introduced. In order to study the fair division of the proceeds, as produced to the members of a cartel, important properties of cooperative oligopoly games must be recalled. In respect thereof the notion of convexity or super-modularity is crucial to expect that firms have strong incentives to merge their economic activities into a monopoly. This property has a strong impact on how an agreement can be stabilized by dividing the proceeds of a mutual cooperation fairly. As we pursue a better and more comprehensive understanding of a fair compromise, a set of principles of distributive justice (axioms) is presented. On the one hand the axiomatic foundation of the Shapley value is given that lets one consider this solution scheme as a fair division rule. On the other hand the axiomatic foundation of the pre-kernel is presented to set a counter-point to what subjects consider as fair or unfair. Beside its attractive axiomatic characterization, it is argued that an efficient and easy computability of a proposed solution is a desirable feature to qualify as a fair division rule. It is established on the basis of the introduced cooperative oligopoly game that the pre-kernel is technically more complicated and is therefore difficult to compute. A clear disadvantage with regard to the Shapley value which possesses a simple, efficient, and systematic computation procedure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Aumann, R. J. (1961). A survey on cooperative games without side payments. In M. Shubik (Ed.), Essays in mathematical economics in honor of oskar morgenstern (pp. 3–27). Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, M., & Maschler, M. (1965). The Kernel of a cooperative game. Naval Research Logistic Quarterly, 12, 223–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Driessen, T., & Meinhardt, H. I. (2001). (Average-) convexity of common pool and oligopoly TU-games. International Game Theory Review, 3, 141–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Driessen, T., & Meinhardt, H. I. (2005). Convexity of oligopoly games without transferable technologies. Mathematical Social Sciences, 50(1), 102–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Driessen, T. S. H., & Meinhardt, H. I. (2010). On the supermodularity of homogeneous oligopoly games. International Game Theory Review (IGTR), 12, 309–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, S., & Mas-Colell, A. (1989). Potential, value and consistency. Econometrica, 57, 589–614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maschler, M. (1992). The bargaining set, Kernel and nucleolus. In R. J. Aumann & S. Hart (Eds.), Handbook of game theory (Vol. 1, chap. 18, pp. 591–668). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maschler, M., Peleg, B., & Shapley, L. S. (1972). The Kernel and bargaining set for convex games. International Journal of Game Theory, 1, 73–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maschler, M., Peleg, B., & Shapley, L. S. (1979). Geometric properties of the Kernel, nucleolus, and related solution concepts. Mathematics of Operations Research, 4, 303–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meinhardt, H. I. (1999a). Common pool games are convex games. Journal of Public Economic Theory, 2, 247–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meinhardt, H. I. (1999b). Convexity and k-convexity in cooperative common pool games. Discussion Paper 11, Institute for Statistics and Economic Theory, University Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meinhardt, H. I. (2002). Cooperative decision making in common pool situations (Volume 517 of Lecture notes in economics and mathematical systems). Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meinhardt, H. I. (2005a). Graphical extensions of the mathematica package Tu-games. Technical report, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT). http://library.wolfram.com/infocenter/Courseware/5709/TuGamesView3D.pdf.

  • Meinhardt, H. I. (2006). An LP approach to compute the pre-Kernel for cooperative games. Computers and Operations Research, 33(2), 535–557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meinhardt, H. I. (2012a). Tugames: A mathematica package for cooperative game theory. Version: 2.2, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Karlsruhe, Mimeo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meinhardt, H. I. (2012b). MatTugames: A matlab toolbox for cooperative game theory. Version: 0.3, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Karlsruhe. http://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/35933.

  • Meinhardt, H. I. (2012c). The Matlab game theory toolbox MatTugames Version 0.3: An introduction, basics, and examples. Technical report, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT). http://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/35933.

  • Moulin, H. (1981). Deterrence and cooperation: A classification of two person games. European Economic Review, 15, 179–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moulin, H. (1988). Axioms of cooperative decision making (Econometric society monographs, No. 15). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norde, H., Pham Do, K. H., & Tijs, S. (2002). Oligopoly games with and without transferable technologies. Mathematical Social Sciences, 43, 187–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostmann, A. (1988). Limits of rational behavior in cooperatively played normalform games. In R. Tietz, W. Albers, & R. Selten (Eds.), Bounded rational behavior in experimental games and markets (Lecture notes in economics and mathematical systems, Vol. 314, pp. 317–332). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostmann, A. (1994). A note on cooperation in symmetric common dilemmas, Mimeo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostmann, A., & Meinhardt, H. I. (2007). Non-binding agreements and fairness in commons dilemma games. Central European Journal of Operations Research, 15(1), 63–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostmann, A., & Meinhardt, H. I. (2008). Toward an analysis of cooperation and fairness that includes concepts of cooperative game theory. In A. Biel, D. Eek, T. Garling, & M. Gustafson (Eds.), New issues and paradigms in research on social dilemmas (pp. 230–251). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Peleg, B., & Sudhölter, P. (2007). Introduction to the theory of cooperative games (Volume 34 of Theory and decision library: Series C, 2nd ed.). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmeidler, D. (1969). The nucleolus of a characteristic function game. SIAM Journal of Applied Mathematics, 17, 1163–1170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapley, L. S. (1971). Cores of convex games. International Journal of Game Theory, 1, 11–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vives, X. (1999). Oligopoly pricing: Old ideas and new tools. Cambridge: MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Neumann, J., & Morgenstern, O. (1944). Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, J. (1999). A necessary and sufficient condition for the convexity in oligopoly games. Mathematical Social Sciences, 37, 189–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Meinhardt, H.I. (2014). Fair Division in Cournot Markets. In: The Pre-Kernel as a Tractable Solution for Cooperative Games. Theory and Decision Library C, vol 45. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39549-9_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39549-9_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-39548-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-39549-9

  • eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics