Abstract
Acute and recurrent vesicular hand eczema is an eczematous eruption on the palmar skin of patients for whom no external contactants can be identified as the cause of the eruptions.
The dermatitis may be seen as a reaction to oral drugs or to tinea pedis. Some studies show a relationship to atopy. Oral ingestion of the hapten in contact-sensitized patients may lead to recurrence of vesicular hand eczema.
Management includes attempts to identify the cause of the eruption. Pharmacological treatment is similar to that for other types of hand eczema.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Storrs F. Acute and recurrent vesicular hand dermatitis not pompholyx or dyshidrosis. Arch Dermatol. 2007;143(12):1578–80.
Kutzner H, Wurzel RM, Wolff HH. Are acrosyringia involved in the pathogenesis of “dyshidrosis”? Am J Dermatopathol. 1986;8(2):109–16.
Shelley WB. Dysidrosis (pompholyx). Arch Dermatol Syph. 1953;68:314–8.
Christensen OB, Möller H. External and internal exposure to the allergen in the hand eczema of nickel allergy. Contact Dermatitis. 1975;1(3):136–41.
Menné T, Hjorth N. Pompholyx – dyshidrotic eczema. Semin Dermatol. 1983;2(1):75–80.
Lofgren SM, Warshaw EM. Dyshidrosis: epidemiology, clinical characteristics and therapy. Dermatitis. 2006;17(4):165–81.
Wollina U. Pompholyx. A review of clinical features, differential diagnosis, and management. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2010;11(5):306–14.
Veien NK, Menné T. Acute and recurrent vesicular hand dermatitis (pompholyx). In: Menné T, Maibach H, editors. Hand eczema. 2nd ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2000.
Veien NK. Acute and recurrent vesicular hand dermatitis. Dermatol Clin. 2009;27(3):337–53.
Agrup G. Hand eczema and other hand dermatoses in South Sweden [thesis]. Acta Derm Venereol. 1969;49 Suppl 61:1–91.
Thelin I, Agrup G. Pompholyx – a one year series. Acta Derm Venereol. 1985;65:214–7.
Meding B. Epidemiology of hand eczema in an industrial city [dissertation]. Acta Derm Venereol. 1990;Suppl 153:1–43.
Johansen JD, Hald M, Andersen BL, Laurberg G, Danielsen A, Avnstorp C, et al. Classification of hand eczema: clinical and aetiological types. Based on the guideline of the Danish Contact Dermatitis Group. Contact Dermatitis. 2011;65(1):13–21.
Diepgen TL, Andersen KE, Brandao FM, Bruze M, Bruynzeel DP, Frosch P, et al., on behalf of the European Environmental and Contact Dermatitis Research Group. Hand eczema classification: a cross-sectional, multicentre study of the aetiology and morphology of hand eczema. Br J Dermatol. 2008;160:353–58.
Handa S, Kaur I, Gupta T, Jindal R. Hand eczema. Correlation of morphologic patterns, atopy, contact sensitization and disease severity. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Lepro. 2012;78(2):153–8.
Meneghini CL, Angelini G. Contact and microbial allergy in pompholyx. Contact Dermatitis. 1979;5(1):46–50.
Lodi A, Betti R, Charelli G, Urbani CE, Crosti C. Epidemiological clinical and allergological observations on pompholyx. Contact Dermatitis. 1992;26(1):17–21.
Bryld LE, Agner T, Menné T. Relation between vesicular eruptions on the hands and tinea pedis, atopic dermatitis and nickel allergy. Acta Derm Venereol. 2003;83:186–8.
Pitché P, Boukari M, Tchangai-Walla K. Factors associated with palmoplantar or plantar pompholyx: a case-control study [in French]. Ann Dermatol Venereol. 2006;133(2):139–43.
Guillet MH, Wierzbicka E, Guillet S, Dagregorio G, Guillet G. A 3-year causative study of pompholyx in 120 patients. Arch Dermatol. 2007;143(12):1504–8.
Schwanitz HJ. Das atopische Palmoplantarekzem. Berlin: Springer; 1986.
Kaaman T, Torssander J. Dermatophytid – a misdiagnosed entity? Acta Derm Venerol. 1983;63(5):404–8.
Veien NK, Hattel T, Laurberg G. Plantar Trichophyton rubrum infections may cause dermatophytids on the hands. Acta Derm Venereol. 1994;74:403–4.
Gerstenblith MR, Antony AK, Junkins-Hopkins JM, Abuav R. Pompholyx and eczematous reactions associated with intravenous immunoglobulin therapy. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2011;66(2):312–6.
Ekelund A-G, Möller H. Oral provocation in eczematous contact allergy to neomycin and hydroxyquinolines. Acta Derma Venerol. 1969;49:422–6.
Menné T, Weismann K. Hämatogenes Kontaktekzem nach oraler Gabe von Neomyzin. Hautarzt. 1984;35(6):319–20.
Dorado Bris JM, Aragues Montañes M, Sols Candela M, Garcia DA. Contact sensitivity to pyrazinobutazone (Carudol®) with positive oral provocation test. Contact Dermatitis. 1992;26(5):355–6.
Piqué E, Pérez JA, Benjumeda A. Oral piroxicam-induced dyshidrosiform dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis. 2004;50(6):382–3.
Baeck M, Pilette C, Drieghe J, Goossens A. Allergic contact dermatitis to inhalation steroids. Eur J Dermatol. 2010;20(1):102–8.
Möller H. Contact allergy to gold as a model for clinical-experimental research. Contact Dermatitis. 2010;62(4):193–200.
Burden AD, Wilkinson SM, Beck MH, Chalmers RJ. Garlic induced systemic contact dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis. 1994;30(5):299–300.
Oliwiecki S, Beck MH, Hausen BM. Compositae dermatitis aggravated by eating lettuce. Contact Dermatitis. 1991;24(4):318–9.
Dooms-Goosens A, Fubelloy R, Degreef H. Contact and systemic contact-type dermatitis to spices. Dermatol Clin. 1990;8(1):89–93.
Veien NK, Hattel T, Justesen O, Nørholm A. Oral challenge with balsam of Peru. Contact Dermatitis. 1985;12(2):104–7.
Niinimäki A. Delayed-type allergy to spices. Contact Dermatitis. 1984;11(1):34–40.
Niinimäki A. Double-blind placebo-controlled peroral challenges in patients with delayed-type allergy to balsam of Peru. Contact Dermatitis. 1995;33(2):78–83.
Schalock PC, Menné T, Johansen JD, Taylor JS, Maibach HI, Lidén C, et al. Hypersensitivity reactions to metallic implants – diagnostic algorithm and suggested patch test series for clinical use. Contact Dermatitis. 2012;66(1):4–19.
Kerosuo H, Kanerva L. Systemic contact dermatitis caused by nickel in a stainless steel orthodontic appliance. Contact Dermatitis. 1997;36(2):112–3.
Veien NK, Borchorst E, Hattel T, Laurberg G. Stomatitis of systemically-induced contact dermatitis from metal wire on orthodontic materials. Contact Dermatitis. 1994;30(4):210–3.
Smeenk G, Teunissen PC. Allergische reacties op nickel uit infusie-toedieningssystemen [in Dutch]. Ned Tijdscht Geneeskd. 1977;121:4–9.
Kanerva L, Förström L. Allergic nickel and chromate hand dermatitis induced by orthopaedic metal implant. Contact Dermatitis. 2001;44(2):103–4.
Bedello PG, Goitre M, Cane D, Roncarolo G. Nichel: aptene ubiquitario. [in Italian]. G Ital Dermatol Venereol. 1985;120(4):293–6.
Hindsén M, Bruze M, Christensen OB. Flare-up reactions after oral challenge with nickel in relation to challenge dose and intensity and time of previous patch test reactions. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2001;44:616–23.
Veien NK, Hattel T, Justesen O, Nørholm A. Oral challenge with nickel and cobalt in patients with positive patch tests to nickel and/or cobalt. Acta Derm Venereol. 1987;67:321–6.
Veien NK, Hattel T, Laurberg G. Placebo-controlled oral challenge with cobalt in patients with positive patch tests to cobalt. Contact Dermatitis. 1995;33(1):54–5.
Lein LR, Fowler Jr JF. Nickel dermatitis recall during disulfiram therapy for alcohol abuse. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1992;26(4):645–6.
Menné T. Flare-up of cobalt dermatitis from Antabuse® treatment. Contact Dermatitis. 1985;12(1):53.
Yokozeki H, Katayama I, Nishioka K, Kinoshita M, Nishiyama S. The role of metal allergy and local hyperhidrosis in the pathogenesis of pompholyx. J Dermatol. 1992;19(12):964–7.
Kaaber K, Veien NK. The significance of chromate ingestion in patients allergic to chromate. Acta Derm Venereol. 1977;57(4):321–3.
Veien NK, Hattel T, Laurberg G. Chromate-allergic patients challenged orally with potassium dichromate. Contact Dermatitis. 1994;31(3):137–9.
Flood JM, Perry DJ. Role of food allergy in eczematoid dermatitis. Arch Dermatol Syphilol. 1947;55:493–506.
Veien NK, Hattel T, Justesen O. Dermatoses in coffee drinkers. Cutis. 1987;40:421–2.
Man I, Ibbotson SH, Ferguson J. Photoinduced pompholyx: a report of 5 cases. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2004;50(1):55–60.
Miller RM, Coger RW. Skin conductance conditioning with dyshidrotic eczema patients. Br J Dermatol. 1979;101:435–40.
Koldys KW, Meyer RP. Biofeedback training in the therapy of dyshidrosis. Cutis. 1979;24:219–21.
Chen J-J, Liang Y-H, Zhou F-S, Yang S, Wang J, Wang PG, et al. The gene for a rare autosomal dominant form of pompholyx maps to chromosome 18q22.1–18q22.3. J Invest Dermatol. 2006;126(2):300–4.
Patrizi A, Rizzoli L, Benassi L, Nerit I. Another case of dyshidrosiform pemphigoid. Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2003;17:348–72.
Lupi F, Masini C, Ruffelli M, Puddu P, Cianchini G. Dyshidrosiform palmoplantar pemphigoid in a young man: response to dapsone. Acta Derm Venereol. 2010;90(1):80–1.
Vocks E, Plötz SG, Ring J. The dyshidrotic eczema area and severity index – a score developed for the assessment of dyshidrotic eczema. Dermatology. 1999;198(3):265–9.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Veien, N.K. (2014). Acute and Recurrent Vesicular Hand Eczema. In: Alikhan, A., Lachapelle, JM., Maibach, H. (eds) Textbook of Hand Eczema. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39546-8_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39546-8_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-39545-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-39546-8
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)