Advertisement

Affective Service Design Considered Informational Assimilation of Layout Factors

  • Youngil Cho
  • SuKyoung Kim
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 373)

Abstract

While the changes in the focus and characters of service design have been complicated, its qualities regarding intuitively preferred factors, have not been investigated enough. This study shows how design factors affect user’s intuitive preference and what make a user’s attention focused on informational assimilation. Through the experiment, the layout factors and its values are verified. It was investigated (1) which layout factors arouse a user’s attention, (2) how much uers were satisfied with the verified factors. The results shows that (1) elaborate images are the most important layout factor among five considerable factors, to arouse user’s attentions, (2) the elaborate figures affect significantly all affective evaluation values, which were proved its relationship between user’s attentions and the evaluation values through previous study; preference, aesthetic, and pleasure.

Keywords

affective empathy design 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Johnson, S.P., Menor, L.J., Roth, A.V., Chase, R.B.: A Critical Evaluation of the New Service Development Process: Integrating Service Innovation and Service Design. In: Fitzsimmons, J.A., Fitzsimmons, M.J. (eds.) New Service Development: Creating Memorable Experiences. Sage, Thousand Oaks (2000)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Menor, L., Tatikonda, M.V., Sampson, S.E.: New Service Development: Area for Exploitation and Exploration. Journal of Operations Management 20, 135–157 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Edvardsson, B., Thomasson, B., Øvretveit, J.: Quality of Service. Making It Really Work. McGraw-Hill, London (1994)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zeithaml, V.A., Berry, L.L., Parasuraman, A.: Delivering Quality Service. Balancing Customer Perceptions and Expectations, p. 157. Free Press, New York (1990)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gummesson, E.: Service Management: An Evaluation and the Future. International Journal of Service Industry Management 5(1), 77–96 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Norling, P., Edvardsson, B., Gummesson, E.: Tjänsteut - veckling och tjänstekonstruction. Research Report, Service Research Center, University of Karlstad, Sweden 92(5) (1992)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kim, S.K., Cho, Y.I., Niki, K., Yamanaka, T.: The Influence of Holistic View Impression in Product Evaluation by an Approach in Kansei. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Kansei Engineering and Emotion Research, pp. 945–952 (2012)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kim, S.K., Cho, Y.I., Niki, K., Yamanaka, T.: The Relationship between Preference and Kansei Values. Kansei Engineering International Journal 11(4), 1–8 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pilat, D.: Innovation and Productivity in Services. State of the Art, Sydney (2000)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Youngil Cho
    • 1
  • SuKyoung Kim
    • 2
  1. 1.Hiroshima Kokusai Gakuin UniversityHiroshima-kenJapan
  2. 2.Hiroshima City UniversityHiroshima-shiJapan

Personalised recommendations