Advertisement

A Review on Emotional Evaluations for Smart Phone

  • Amaka Mercy Udengwu
  • Tek Yong Lim
  • Soon-Fatt Cheong
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 373)

Abstract

Human Computer Interaction (HCI) has become progressively more concerned with user experience and emotions. A variety of what experience and emotions is has been expressed in modern years which propose an amount of vital insights but it is unclear on how they inform design. The aim of this paper is to gain a deeper understanding on the techniques to collect and evaluate emotional responses conducted by other researchers. Four evaluation methods were reviewed, namely valence method, self-reported method, experiment method and semantic differential method.

Keywords

Emotional Design Smart Phone Evaluation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Norman, D.A.: Preface. In: Schifferstein, H.N.J., Hekkert, P. (eds.) Product Experience, pp. xix–xx. Elsevier, San Diego (2008)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Nagamachi, M.: Perspectives and the New Trend of Kansei/Affective Engineering. TQM Journal 20(4), 290–298 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Nagamachi, M.: Kansei Engineering: A New Ergonomic Consumer-Oriented Technology For Product Development. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 15(1), 3–11 (1995)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Norman, D.A.: Emotional Design: Why Do We Love (Or Hate) Everyday Things. Basic Books, New York (2004)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Burmester, M., Mast, M., Jager, K., Homans, H.: Valence Method for formative evaluation of user experience. In: Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems, Stuttgart, Germany, pp. 364–367 (2010)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Isomursu, M., Tahti, M., Vainamo, S., Kuutti, K.: Experimental evaluation of five methods for collecting emotions in field settings with mobile applications. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 65(4), 404–418 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Isomursu, M., Kuutti, K., Väinämö, S.: Experience Clip: Method For User Participation and Evaluation of Mobile Concepts. In: Proceedings of the Participatory Design Conference, pp. 83–92 (2004)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Quinn, J.M., Tran, T.Q.: Attractive phones don’t have to work better: independent effects of attractiveness, effectiveness and efficiency on perceived usability. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Atlanta, GA, USA, pp. 353–362 (2010)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chuang, M.C., Chang, C.C., Hsu, S.H.: Perceptual factors underlying user preferences towards product form of mobile phones. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 27(4), 247–258 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Amaka Mercy Udengwu
    • 1
  • Tek Yong Lim
    • 1
  • Soon-Fatt Cheong
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Computing and InformaticsMultimedia University, Jalan MultimediaCyberjayaMalaysia

Personalised recommendations