Advertisement

Physio-behavioral Coupling as an Index of Team Processes and Performance: Overview, Measurement, and Empirical Application

  • Adam J. Strang
  • Gregory J. Funke
  • Sheldon M. Russell
  • Robin D. Thomas
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8027)

Abstract

Research shows that teammates often exhibit similarity in their physiological and behavioral responses during cooperative task performance, a phenomenon referred to here as physio-behavioral coupling (PBC). Goals of this manuscript are to provide an overview of research examining the utility of PBC as an index of team processes (e.g., coordination) and performance, discuss applied and theoretical issues in PBC measurement, and present findings from a study using linear and nonlinear statistics to assess PBC.

Keywords

Team Coupling Coordination Performance Nonlinear 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Knoblich, G., Butterfill, S., Sebanz, N.: Psychological research on joint action: Theory and data. In: Ross, B. (ed.) The Psychology of Learning and Motivation. Academic Press, Burlington (2011)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Henning, R.A., Boucsein, W., Gil, M.C.: Social-physiological compliance as a determinant of team performance. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 40, 221–232 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Elkins, A.N., Muth, E.R., Hoover, A.W., Walker, A.D., Carpenter, T.L., Switzer, F.S.: Physiological compliance and team performance. Appl. Ergon. 40, 997–1000 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Shockley, K., Baker, A.A., Richardson, M.J., Fowler, C.A.: Articulatory constraints on interpersonal postural coordination. J. Exp. Psychol. Human. 33, 201–208 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Strang, A.J., Funke, G.J., Knott, B.A., Warm, J.S.: Physio-behavioral synchronicity as an index of processes supporting team performance. Human Fac. Erg. Soc. P. 55, 1447–1451 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Salas, E., Fiore, S.M.: Team cognition:Understanding the factors that drive process and performance. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC (2004)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Konvalinka, I., Xygalatas, D., Bilbulia, J., Schjodt, U., Jegindo, E., Wallot, S., Van Orden, G., Roepstorff, A.: Synchronized arousal between performers and related spectators in a fire-walking ritual. P. Natl. A. Sci. USA 108, 8514–8519 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bernieri, F.J.: Coordinated movement and rapport in teacher-student interactions. J. Nonverbal Behav. 12, 120–138 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wiltermuth, S.S., Heath, C.: Synchrony and cooperation. Psycholog. Sci. 20, 1–5 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mullen, B., Copper, C.: The relation between group cohesiveness and performance: integration. Psychol. Bull. 115, 201–227 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gully, S.M., Incalcaterra, K., Joshi, A., Beaubien, J.M.: A meta-analysis of team-efficacy, potency, and performance: Interdependence and level of analysis as moderators of observed relationships. J. Appl. Psychol. 87, 819–832 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Shockley, K.: Cross recurrence quantification of interpersonal postural activity. In: Riley, M.A., Van Order, G.C. (eds.) Tutorials in Contemporary Nonlinear Methods for the Behavioral Sciences, http://www.nsf.gov/sbe/bcs/pac/nmbs/nmbs.jsp (accessed February 1, 2013)
  13. 13.
    Schmidt, R.C., O’Brien, B.: Evaluating the dynamics of unintended interpersonal coordination. Ecol. Psychol. 9, 189–206 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Peters, B.T., Haddad, J.M., Heiderscheit, B.C., Van Emmerick, R.E.A., Hamill, J.: Limitations in the use and interpretation of continuous relative phase. J. Biomech. 36, 271–274 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Chatfield, C.: The analysis of time series: An introduction, 6th edn. CRC Press, New York (2004)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Carroll, J.P., Freedman, W.: Nonstationary properties of postural sway. J. Biomech. 26, 409–416 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zbilut, J.P., Webber, C.L., Zak, M.: Quantification of heart rate variability using methods derived from nonlinear dynamics. In: Drzewiecki, G.M., Li, J.K. (eds.) Analysis and Assessment of Cardiovascular Function, pp. 324–334. Springer, New York (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Richman, J.S., Moorman, J.R.: Physiological time-series analysis using approximate and sample entropy. Am. J. Physiol-Heart C. 278, H2039–H2049 (2000)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Thomas, R.D., Moses, N.C., Semple, E.A., Strang, A.J.: A usable and efficient algorithm for the computation of average mutual information: Validation and implementation in Matlab. J. Math. Psycholog. (under review) Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Pereda, E., Quiroga, R.Q., Bhattacharya, J.: Nonlinear multivariate analysis of neurophysiological signals. Prog. Neurobiol. 77, 1–37 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Shockley, K., Butwill, M., Zbilut, J.P., Webber, C.L.: Cross recurrence quantification of coupled oscillators. Phys. Lett. A 305, 59–69 (2002)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Liu, L.Z., Qian, X.Y., Lu, H.Y.: Cross-sample entropy of foreign exchange time series. Physica A 389, 4785–4792 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Zhang, T., Yang, Z., Coote, J.H.: Cross-sample entropy statistic as a measure of complexity and regularity of renal sympathetic nerve activity in the rat. Exp. Physiol. 92, 659–669 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ramdani, S., Seigle, B., Lagarde, J., Bouchara, F., Bernard, P.L.: On the use of sample entropy to analyze human postural sway data. Med. Eng. Phys. 31, 1023–1031 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    van Schie, H.T., Waterschoot, B.M., Bekkering, H.: Understanding action beyond imitation: Reversed compatibility effects of action observation in imitation and joint action. J. Exp. Psychol. Human. 34, 1493–1500 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Adam J. Strang
    • 1
  • Gregory J. Funke
    • 2
  • Sheldon M. Russell
    • 2
  • Robin D. Thomas
    • 3
  1. 1.Consortium Research Fellows ProgramAlexandriaUSA
  2. 2.Air Force Research LaboratoryWright-Patterson AFBUSA
  3. 3.Miami UniversityOxfordUSA

Personalised recommendations