Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Optional Techniques

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Knee Joint Arthroplasty

  • 2101 Accesses

Abstract

The development of surgical tools and technology has extended its territory to newer surgical fields. Good examples include computer assisted surgery and arthroscopic surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Aglietti P, Baldini A, Sensi L. Quadriceps-sparing versus mini-subvastus approach in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. 2006;452:106–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Amiot LP, Poulin F. Computed tomography-based navigation for hip, knee, and spine surgery. Clin Orthop. 2004;421:77–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson KC, Buehler KC, Markel DC. Computer assisted navigation in total knee arthroplasty: comparison with conventional methods. J Arthroplasty. 2005;20 Suppl 3:132–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bargar WL. Robots in orthopaedic surgery: past, present, and future. Clin Orthop. 2007;463:31–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barrack CM, Barnes CL, Burnett RS, et al. Minimal incision surgery as a risk factor for early failure of total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2009;24:489–98.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bathis H, Perlick L, Tingart M, et al. Alignment in total knee arthroplasty. A comparison of computer assisted surgery with the conventional technique. J Bone Joint Surg. 2004;86-B:682–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauwens K, Matthes G, Wich M, et al. Navigated total knee replacement. A meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg. 2007;89-A:261–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bellemans J, Vandenneucker H, Vanlauwe J. Robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. 2007;464:111–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bonutti P, Dethmers D, Stiehl JB. Case report: femoral shaft fracture resulting from femoral tracker placement in navigated TKA. Clin Orthop. 2008;466:1499–502.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bonutti PM, Mont MA, McMahon M, et al. Minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg. 2004;86-A Suppl 2:26–32.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bonutti PM, Neal DJ, Kester MA. Minimal incision total knee arthroplasty using the suspended leg techinque. Orthopedics. 2003;26:899–903.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chauhan SK, Scott RG, Breidahl W, et al. Computer-assisted knee arthroplasty versus a conventional jig-based technique. A randomized, prospective trial. J Bone Joint Surg. 2004;86-B:372–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng T, Liu T, Zhang G, et al. Does minimally invasive surgery improve short-term recovery in total knee arthroplasty? Clin Orthop. 2010;468:1635–48.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Choi YJ, Tanavalee A, Pak AH, et al. Minimally invasive surgery for total knee arthroplasty. In: Scuderi GR, editor. MIS of the hip and the knee: a clinical perspective. 1st ed. New York: Springer; 2004. p. 187–98.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Chung BJ, Kang YG, Chang CB, et al. Differences between sagittal femoral mechanical and distal reference axes should be considered in navigated TKA. Clin Orthop. 2009;467:2403–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Clemens U, Miehlke RK. Experience using the latest OrthoPilot TKA software: a comparative study. Surg Technol Int. 2003;11:265–73.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cook JL, Scuderi GR, Tenholder M. Incidence of lateral release in total knee arthroplasty in standard and mini-incision approaches. Clin Orthop. 2006;452:123–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Church JS, Scadden JE, Gupta RR, et al. Embolic phenomena during computer-assisted and conventional total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg. 2007;89-B:481–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delp SL, Stulberg SD, Davies B, et al. Computer assisted knee replacement. Clin Orthop. 1998;354:49–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dutton AQ, Yeo SJ, Yang KY, et al. Computer-assisted minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty compared with standard total knee arthroplasty. A prospective, randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg. 2008;90-A:2–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ensini A, Catani F, Leardini A, et al. Alignments and clinical results in conventional and navigated total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. 2007;457:156–62.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fehring TK, Berend KR, Hofmann S, et al. Advanced technologies in performing total knee arthroplasty: roundtable discussion. In: Scott WN, editor. Surgery of the knee. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone; 2011. p. 1283–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Floren M, Davis J, Peterson MG, et al. A mini-midvastus capsular approach with patellar displacement decreases the prevalence of patella baja. J Arthroplasty. 2007;22:51–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Garg A, Walker PS. Prediction of total knee motion using a three-dimensional computer graphics model. J Biochem. 1988;3:67–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haaker RG, Stockheim M, Kamp M, et al. Computer-assisted navigation increases precision of component placement in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. 2005;433:152–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hafez M. Custom-made cutting guides for total knee arthroplasty. In: Scott WN, editor. Surgery of the knee. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone; 2011. p. 1240–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hafez MA, Jaramaz B, Digioia III A. Computer-assisted knee surgery: an overview. In: Scott WN, editor. Surgery of the knee. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone; 2006. p. 1655–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heal J, Blewitt N. Kinemax total knee arthroplasty: trial by template. J Arthroplasty. 2002;17:90–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hernández-Vaquero D, Suarez-Vazquez A, Iglesias-Fernandez S. Can computer assistance improve the clinical and functional scores in total knee arthroplasty? Clin Orthop. 2011;469:3436–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hofmann AA, McCandless J. Imageless computer navigation in total knee arthroplasty: the simpler wave of future. In: Scott WN, editor. Surgery of the knee. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone; 2011. p. 1217–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang HT, Su JY, Chang JK, et al. The early clinical outcome of minimally invasive quadriceps-sparing total knee arthroplasty: report of a 2-year follow-up. J Arthroplasty. 2007;22:1007–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jenny JY, Clemens U, Kohler S, et al. Consistency of implantation of a total knee arthroplasty with a non-image-based navigation system: a case-control study of 235 cases compared with 235 conventionally implanted prostheses. J Arthroplasty. 2005;20:832–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kalairajah Y, Cossey AJ, Verrrall GM, et al. Are systemic emboli reduced in computer-assisted knee surgery? A prospective, randomised, clinical trial. J Bone Joint Surg. 2006;88-B:198–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kienzle III TC, Stulberg SD, Peshkin M, et al. A computer-assisted total knee replacement surgical system using a calibrated robot. In: Taylor RH, editor. Computer-integrated surgery. 1st ed. London: The MIT Press; 1996. p. 409–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim YH, Kim JS, Yoon SH. Alignment and orientation of the components in total knee replacement with and without navigation support: a prospective, randomised study. J Bone Joint Surg. 2007;89-B:471–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein GR, Austin MS, Smith EB, et al. Total knee arthroplasty using computer-assisted navigation in patients with deformities of the femur and tibia. J Arthroplasty. 2006;21:284–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Krackow KA. Fine tuning your next total knee: computer assisted surgery. Orthopedics. 2003;26:971–2.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Krackow KA, Serpe L, Phillips MJ, et al. Operative technique: a new technique for determining proper mechanical axis alignment during total knee arthroplasty: progress toward computer-assisted TKR. Orthopedics. 1999;22:698–702.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lionberger DR. Computer-assisted navigation: Minimally invasive surgery for total knee replacement. In: Scott WN, editor. Surgery of the knee. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone; 2011a. p. 1275–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lionberger DR. Electromagnetic computer-assisted navigation. In: Scott WN, editor. Surgery of the knee. In: Scott WN ed. Surgery of the knee. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone; 2011b. p. 1223–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lionberger DR. Electromagnetic computer assisted navigation in total knee replacement. In: Scott WN, editor. Surgery of the knee. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone; 2006. p. 1705–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luring C, Hufner T, Perlick L, et al. The effectiveness of sequential medial soft tissue release on coronal alignment in total knee arthroplasty: using a computer navigation model. J Arthroplasty. 2006;21:428–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mai S, Siebert WE, Heeckt PF. Robotics in total knee arthroplasty. In: Scott WN, editor. Surgery of the knee. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone; 2011. p. 1269–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martelli M, Mareacci M, Nofrini L, et al. Computer-and robot-assisted total knee replacement: analysis of a new surgical procedure. Ann Biomed Eng. 2000;28:1146–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mason JB, Fehring TK, Estok R, et al. Meta-analysis of alignment outcomes in computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty surgery. J Arthroplasty. 2007;22:1097–106.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Matsen III FA, Garbini JL, Sidles JA, et al. Robotic assistance in orthopaedic surgery. A proof of principle using distal femoral arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. 1993;296:178–86.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Matsumoto T, Muratsu H, Tsumura N, et al. Soft tissue balance measurement in posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty with a navigation system. J Arthroplasty. 2009;24:358–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Matziolis G, Krocker D, Weiss U, et al. A prospective, randomized study of computer-assisted and conventional total knee arthroplasty. Three-dimensional evaluation of implant alignment and rotation. J Bone Joint Surg. 2007;89-A:236–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nunley RM, Ellison BS, Zhu J, et al. Do patient-specific guides improve coronal alignment in total knee arthroplasty? Clin Orthop. 2012;470:895–902.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Patil N, Nett MP, Tria Jr A, et al. Surgical approaches in total knee arthroplasty: Standard and MIS techniques. In: Scott WN, editor. Surgery of the knee. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone; 2011. p. 1029–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mihalko WM, Duquin T, Axelrod JR, et al. Location and number of cortical fixation points and the effect on reference base stability during computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2007;22:605–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Minoda Y, Kobayashi A, Iwaki H, et al. TKA sagittal alignment with navigation systems and conventional techniques vary only a few degrees. Clin Orthop. 2009;467:1000–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moon YW, Seo JG, Lim SJ, et al. Variability in femoral component rotation reference axes measured during navigation-assisted total knee arthroplasty using gap technique. J Arthroplasty. 2010;25:238–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mullaji A, Shetty GM. Computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty for arthritis with extra-articular deformity. J Arthroplasty. 2009;24:1164-1169 e1161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munjal S, Krackow KA. Computer-assisted total knee replacement. In: Scott WN, editor. Surgery of the knee. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone; 2006. p. 1689–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nabeyama R, Matsua S, Miura H, et al. The accuracy of image guided knee replacement based on computed tomography. J Bone Joint Surg. 2003;86-B:366–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niki Y, Matsumoto H, Otani T, et al. Accuracy of implant positioning for minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty in patients with severe varus deformity. J Arthroplasty. 2010;25:381–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nishihara S, Sugano N, Ikai M, et al. Accuracy evaluation of a shape-based registration method for a computer navigation system for total knee arthroplasty. J Knee Surgery. 2003;16:98–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park SE, Lee CT. Comparison of robotic-assisted and conventional manual implantation of a primary total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2007;22:1054–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Perlick L, Bathis H, Tingart M, et al. Navigation in total-knee arthroplasty: CT-based implantation compared with the conventional technique. Acta Orthop Scand. 2004;75:464–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Picard F, Moody J, Jaramaz A, et al. A classification proposal for computer-assisted knee systems. In: Scott LD et al., editors. Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention-MICCAI 2000, Lecture notes in computer science,1935; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radermacher K, Portheine F, Anton M, et al. Computer assisted orthopaedic surgery with image based individual templates. Clin Orthop. 1998;354:28–38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Repicci JA, Eberte RW. Minimally invasive surgical technique for unicondylar knee arthroplasty. J South Orthop Assoc. 1999;8:20–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Romanowski MR, Repicci JA. Minimally invasive unicondylar arthroplasty: eight-year follow up. J Knee Surg. 2002;15:17–22.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Romanowski MR, Repicci MR. Technical aspects of medial versus lateral minimally invasive unicondylar arthroplasty. Orthopedics. 2003;26:289–93.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Saragaglia D, Picard F, Chaussard C, et al. Computer-assisted knee arthroplasty: comparison with a conventional procedure. Results of 50 cases in a prospective randomized study. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 2001;87:18–28.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schroer WC, Diesfeld PJ, Reedy ME, et al. Association of increased knee flexion and patella clunk syndrome after mini-subvastus total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2009;24:281–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Scuderi GR, Tenholder M, Capeci C. Surgical approaches in mini-incision total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. 2004;428:61–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Scuderi GR, Tria AJ. Minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty. In: Scott WN, editor. Surgery of the knee. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone; 2006. p. 1631–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seon JK, Song EK. Navigation-assisted less invasive total knee arthroplasty compared with conventional total knee arthroplasty: a randomized prospective trial. J Arthroplasty. 2006;21:777–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Siebert W, Mai S, Kober R, et al. Technique and first clinical results of robot-assisted total knee replacement. Knee. 2002;9:173–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Song EK, Seon JK, Yoon TR, et al. Comparative study of stability after total knee arthroplasties between navigation system and conventional techniques. J Arthroplasty. 2007;22:1107–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sparmann M, Wolk B, Czupalla H, et al. Positioning of total knee arthroplasty with and without navigation support. A prospective, randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg. 2003;85-B:830–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer JM, Chauhan SK, Sloan K, et al. Computer navigation versus conventional total knee replacement: no difference in functional results at two years. J Bone Joint Surg. 2007;89-B:477–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stiehl JB. Computer navigation in primary total knee arthroplasty. In: Scott WN, editor. Surgery of the knee. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone; 2011. p. 1201–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stockl B, Nogler M, Rosiek R, et al. Navigation improves accuracy of rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. 2004;426:180–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stulburg SD. Computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty. In: Scott WN, editor. Surgery of the knee. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone; 2006. p. 1675–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stulberg SD. Computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty. In: Scott WN, editor. Surgery of the knee. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone; 2011. p. 1207–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stulberg SD, Loan P, Sarin V. Computer-assisted navigation in total knee replacement: results of an initial experience in thirty-five patients. J Bone Joint Surg. 2002;84-A:90–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tanavalee A, Thiengwittayaporn S, Itiravivong P. Progressive quadriceps incision during minimally invasive surgery for total knee arthroplasty: the effect on early postoperative ambulation. J Arthroplasty. 2007;22:1013–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Teter KE, Bregman D, Colwell Jr CW. Accuracy of intramedullary versus extramedullary tibial alignment cutting systems in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Othrop. 1995;321:106–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tria AJ. Advancements in minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics. 2003;26:859–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tria AJ. Minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty: the importance of instrumentation. Orthop Clin N Am. 2004;35:227–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tria AJ, Coon TM. Minimal incision total knee arthroplasty: early experience. Clin Orthop. 2003;416:185–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Victor J, Hoste D. Image-based computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty leads to lower variability in coronal alignment. Clin Orthop. 2004;428:131–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Whiteside LA. Mini incision: occasionally desirable, rarely necessary: in the affirmative. J Arthroplasty. 2006;21 Suppl 1:16–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yoo JH, Han DY, Han CD, et al. Radiological evaluation of quadriceps-sparing minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty. J Korean Orthop Assoc. 2006;41:454–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoshino N, Takai S, Ohtsuki Y, et al. Computed tomography measurement of the surgical and clinical transepicondylar axis of the distal femur in osteoarthritic knees. J Arthroplasty. 2001;16:493–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopedic Surgery ASAN Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea, Republic of South Korea

    Wooshin Cho

Authors
  1. Wooshin Cho
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cho, W. (2014). Optional Techniques. In: Knee Joint Arthroplasty. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39389-1_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39389-1_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-39388-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-39389-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation