Data Transmission Latency and Sense of Control
Latency has been identified as a major bottleneck for usability of human-system interaction devices. However, the theoretical basis of the effect of latency on action control mechanisms remains weak. In this study, we aimed to investigate the cognitive implications of latency for Human-Computer Interaction. We proposed models of agency (i.e., mechanism underlying the feeling of control) as a possible interpretative framework on the nature of the transformation induced by latency. In a series of 3 experiments, we propose to tackle this problem by (1) characterizing the effects (performance and agency) of transmission delays on UAS camera control, and (2) designing and evaluating HMI solutions to mitigate these effects with regard to the agency principle. Our results showed that (1) latency decreases sense of agency and human performance, (2) models of agency could provide HMI solution for latency compensation. Interests of agentive experience accounts for better system design are discussed.
KeywordsLatency Agency Action Control UAS Cognition
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 2.Chung, G.K.M., So, R.H.Y.: Manual control with time delays in an immersive virtual environment. In: McCabe, P.T. (ed.) Contemporary Ergonomics 2011. Taylor & Francis (2011)Google Scholar
- 3.Ferrell, W.R.: Remote manipulation with transmission delay. IEEE Trans. on Human Factors in Electronics, HFES 6(1) (1965)Google Scholar
- 4.Foxlin, E.: Motion tracking requirements and technologies. In: Stanney, K.M. (ed.) Handbook of Virtual Environments: Design, Implementation and Applications, pp. 163–210. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah (2002)Google Scholar
- 6.Gilbert, D.T.: Attribution and interpersonal perception. In: Tesser, A. (ed.) Advanced Social Psychology, pp. 98–147. McGraw-Hill (1995)Google Scholar
- 8.MacKenzie, S., Ware, C.: Lag as a determinant of Human performance in interactive systems. In: Proc. ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (INTERCHI), ACM SIGCHI, pp. 488–493 (1993)Google Scholar
- 10.Michotte, A.: The perception of causality. Basic Books, New York (1963) (trans. T. R. Miles, E. Miles); Pavlovych, A., Stuerzlinger, W.: The tradeoff between spatial jitter and latency in pointing tasks. In: Proc. EICS 2009, pp. 187–196. ACM Press (2009)Google Scholar
- 11.Poulton, E.C.: Tracking skill and manual control. Academic, New York (1974)Google Scholar
- 12.Sheridan, T.B.: Musings on telepresence and virtual presence. Presence 1(1), 120–125, 212–227 (1992)Google Scholar
- 13.Smith, K.U., Smith, W.M.: Perception and action, pp. 247–277. Saunders, Philadelphia (1962)Google Scholar
- 14.So, R.H.Y., Chung, G.K.M.: Sensory Motor Responses in Virtual Environments: Studying the Effects of Image Latencies for Target-directed Hand Movement. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 5006 5008 (2005)Google Scholar
- 15.Ware, C., Balakrishnan, R.: Target acquisition in fish tank VR: The effects of lag and frame rate. In: Graphics Interface 1994, pp. 1–7. Canadian Information Processing Society, Toronto (1994)Google Scholar
- 16.Wegner, D.M.: The illusion of conscious will. MIT Press (2002)Google Scholar