Advertisement

Data Transmission Latency and Sense of Control

  • Bruno Berberian
  • Patrick Le Blaye
  • Christian Schulte
  • Nawfel Kinani
  • Pern Ren Sim
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8019)

Abstract

Latency has been identified as a major bottleneck for usability of human-system interaction devices. However, the theoretical basis of the effect of latency on action control mechanisms remains weak. In this study, we aimed to investigate the cognitive implications of latency for Human-Computer Interaction. We proposed models of agency (i.e., mechanism underlying the feeling of control) as a possible interpretative framework on the nature of the transformation induced by latency. In a series of 3 experiments, we propose to tackle this problem by (1) characterizing the effects (performance and agency) of transmission delays on UAS camera control, and (2) designing and evaluating HMI solutions to mitigate these effects with regard to the agency principle. Our results showed that (1) latency decreases sense of agency and human performance, (2) models of agency could provide HMI solution for latency compensation. Interests of agentive experience accounts for better system design are discussed.

Keywords

Latency Agency Action Control UAS Cognition 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Berberian, B., Sarrazin, J.C., Le Blaye, P., Haggard, P.: Automation Technology and Sense of Control: A Window on Human Agency. PLoS ONE 7(3), 34075 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chung, G.K.M., So, R.H.Y.: Manual control with time delays in an immersive virtual environment. In: McCabe, P.T. (ed.) Contemporary Ergonomics 2011. Taylor & Francis (2011)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ferrell, W.R.: Remote manipulation with transmission delay. IEEE Trans. on Human Factors in Electronics, HFES 6(1) (1965)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Foxlin, E.: Motion tracking requirements and technologies. In: Stanney, K.M. (ed.) Handbook of Virtual Environments: Design, Implementation and Applications, pp. 163–210. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah (2002)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gallagher, S.: Philosophical concepts of the self: implications for cognitive sciences. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 4, 14–21 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gilbert, D.T.: Attribution and interpersonal perception. In: Tesser, A. (ed.) Advanced Social Psychology, pp. 98–147. McGraw-Hill (1995)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Haggard, P., Clark, S., Kalogeras, J.: Voluntary action and conscious awareness. Nature Neuroscience 5(4), 382–385 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    MacKenzie, S., Ware, C.: Lag as a determinant of Human performance in interactive systems. In: Proc. ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (INTERCHI), ACM SIGCHI, pp. 488–493 (1993)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    McClure, J.: Discounting causes of behavior: Are two reasons better than one? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 74(1), 7–20 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Michotte, A.: The perception of causality. Basic Books, New York (1963) (trans. T. R. Miles, E. Miles); Pavlovych, A., Stuerzlinger, W.: The tradeoff between spatial jitter and latency in pointing tasks. In: Proc. EICS 2009, pp. 187–196. ACM Press (2009)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Poulton, E.C.: Tracking skill and manual control. Academic, New York (1974)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sheridan, T.B.: Musings on telepresence and virtual presence. Presence 1(1), 120–125, 212–227 (1992)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Smith, K.U., Smith, W.M.: Perception and action, pp. 247–277. Saunders, Philadelphia (1962)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    So, R.H.Y., Chung, G.K.M.: Sensory Motor Responses in Virtual Environments: Studying the Effects of Image Latencies for Target-directed Hand Movement. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 5006 5008 (2005)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ware, C., Balakrishnan, R.: Target acquisition in fish tank VR: The effects of lag and frame rate. In: Graphics Interface 1994, pp. 1–7. Canadian Information Processing Society, Toronto (1994)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wegner, D.M.: The illusion of conscious will. MIT Press (2002)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wegner, D.M.: The mind‘s best trick: How we experience conscious will. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7, 65–69 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wegner, D.M., Wheatley, T.: Apparent mental causation: Sources of the experience of will. American Psychologist 54(7), 480–492 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Young, M.E., Rogers, E.T., Beckmann, J.S.: Causal impressions: predicting when, not just whether. Mem. Cogn. 33, 320–331 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bruno Berberian
    • 1
  • Patrick Le Blaye
    • 1
  • Christian Schulte
    • 1
  • Nawfel Kinani
    • 1
  • Pern Ren Sim
    • 2
  1. 1.Systems Control and Flight Dynamics DepartmentONERASalon de ProvenceFrance
  2. 2.DSO National LaboratoriesSingapore

Personalised recommendations