Abstract
Recently Federici and Scherer [1] proposed an ideal model of an Assistive Technology Assessment (ATA) process that provides reference guidelines for professionals of a multidisciplinary team of assistive technology (AT) service delivery centers to compare, evaluate, and improve their own matching models. The ATA process borrows a user-driven working methodology from the Matching Person and Technology Model [2] and it embraces the biopsychosocial model [3] aiming at the best combination of AT to promote customers’ personal well-being. As Federici and Scherer [1] suggest, the multidisciplinary team, by applying the ATA process, may provide for users not only a device, but much more an assistive solution, which is the real outcome of a match process. An assistive solution is provided for the user only when the interaction dialogue between user, device, and environments of use improves the users’ performances in participating in their everyday contexts. In this theoretical framework, the evaluation of the users’ interaction with the AT in different kinds of environments is a key factor for the success of the ATA process, because, as Mirza, Gossett Zakrajsek, and Borsci [4] claim, the environment is antecedent to the AT and crucial for identifying how the AT works in relation to the users’ needs. In the ATA process a specific Environmental Assessment (EA) model for testing the interaction of the user with the environments of use, through the AT, has been defined. The aim of this paper is to describe the EA model steps and discuss the dimensions that a practitioner has to consider for this assessment. Accessibility, universal design, and sustainability are used in the EA model as the dimensions for measuring the relationship between the AT and the environment [4]. The EA model steps and the trade-off among these dimensions are presented through a case example in which practitioners analyze the relationship between a communication aid used by a child and her classroom and home environments.
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
References
Federici, S., Scherer, M.J.: The Assistive Technology Assessment Model and Basic Definitions. In: Federici, S., Scherer, M.J. (eds.) Assistive Technology Assessment Handbook, pp. 1–10. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2012)
Scherer, M.J. (ed.): Assistive Technology: Matching Device and Consumer for Successful Rehabilitation. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC (2002)
World Health Organization (WHO): ICF: International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. WHO, Geneva, CH (2001)
Mirza, M., Gossett Zakrajsek, A., Borsci, S.: The Assessment of the Environments of Use: Accessibility, Sustainability, and Universal Design. In: Federici, S., Scherer, M.J. (eds.) Assistive Technology Assessment Handbook, pp. 67–81. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2012)
World Health Organization (WHO): A Glossary of Terms for Community Health Care and Services for Older Persons. Technical Report, WHO (2004)
United States Congress: Assistive Technology Act (Public Law 108-364) (2004)
World Health Organization (WHO), World Bank: World Report on Disability. WHO, Geneva, CH (2011)
Stack, J., Zarate, L., Pastor, C., Mathiassen, N.-E., Barberà, R., Knops, H., Kornsten, H.: Analysing and federating the European assistive technology ICT industry. Final Report. European Commission (2009)
Corradi, F., Scherer, M.J., Lo Presti, A.: Measuring the Assistive Technology Match. In: Federici, S., Scherer, M.J. (eds.) Assistive Technology Assessment Handbook, pp. 49–65. CRC Press, London (2012)
Scherer, M.J.: Living in the state of stuck: How technologies affect the lives of people with disabilities. Brookline Books, Cambridge (2005)
Federici, S., Borsci, S.: The use and non-use of assistive technology in Italy: A pilot study. In: Gelderblom, G.J., Soede, M., Adriaens, L., Miesenberger, K. (eds.) Everyday Technology for Independence and Care: AAATE 2011, vol. 29, pp. 979–986. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2011)
Philips, B., Zhao, H.: Predictors of Assistive Technology Abandonment. Assistive Technology 5, 36–45 (1993)
Scherer, M.J., Sax, C.L., Vanbiervliet, A., Cushman, L.A., Scherer, J.V.: Predictors of assistive technology use: The importance of personal and psychosocial factors. Disability and Rehabilitation 27, 1321–1331 (2005)
Aaate.net, http://www.aaate.net/
World Health Organization (WHO): ICF-CY: International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health – Children and Youth Version. WHO, Geneva, CH (2007)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Federci, S., Borsci, S., Mele, M.L. (2013). Environmental Evaluation of a Rehabilitation Aid Interaction under the Framework of the Ideal Model of Assistive Technology Assessment Process. In: Kurosu, M. (eds) Human-Computer Interaction. Human-Centred Design Approaches, Methods, Tools, and Environments. HCI 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8004. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39232-0_23
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39232-0_23
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-39231-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-39232-0
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)