Advertisement

Ambient Assistive Technology Considered Harmful

  • Yngve Dahl
  • Babak Farshchian
  • Anders Kofod-Petersen
  • Silje Bøthun
  • Kristine Holbø
  • Jarl Kåre Reitan
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8011)

Abstract

Ambient assistive technology (AAT) is envisioned as a powerful tool for facing the growing demands the demographic change toward an aging society puts on care. While AAT is often expected to increase the quality of life of older people, this paper holds that relevant interventions often embody values that can contradict such visions, and in some cases even be harmful to care receivers. We argue that the strong focus AAT puts on illness and risk management reflects a medical model of care, which often disregards the psychosocial challenges that impairments and disabilities associated with old age can rise. We suggest that design of AAT could benefit from using the social model of care as design inspiration and value foundation. Such an approach puts focus on the person rather than the illness. The paper ends by providing a short description of work in which the social model of care is adopted as a basis for design of AAT.

Keywords

Ambient assistive technology Disability Elderly care Ethics Human values User-centered design Value sensitive design 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Muenz, R.: Aging and Demographic Change in European Societies: Main Trends and Alternative Policy Options. Number 0703 in SP Discussion Paper. Social Protection Advisory Service – The World Bank, Washington, DC, USA (2007)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    World Health Organization. Global Health and Aging (2011)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Nehmer, J., Becker, M., Karshmer, A., Lamm, R.: Living assistance systems: an ambient intelligence approach. In: Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE 2006), pp. 43–50. ACM, New York (2006)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Brandt, E., Pope, A.: Models of disability and rehabilitation. Enabling America: Assessing the Role of Rehabilitation Science and Engineering, 62–80 (1997)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Antonovsky, A.: Health, Stress and Coping. Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco (1979)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bannon, L.: Reimagining HCI: toward a more human-centered perspective. Interactions 18 (2011)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Friedman, B., Kahn, P.H., Borning, A.: Value sensitive design: Theory and methods. Technical Report 02-12-01, Dept. of Computer Science & Engineering, University of Washington, Washington, Seattle, WA (2002)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Friedman, B., Kahn, P.H., Borning, A.: Value sensitive design and information systems. In: Himma, K.E., Tavani, H.T. (eds.) The Handbook of Information and Computer Ethics. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., Hoboken (2008)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Borning, A., Muller, M.: Next steps for value sensitive design. In: Proceedings of the 2012 ACM Annual Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2012), pp. 1125–1134. ACM, New York (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kitwood, T.: Dementia reconsidered: the person comes first. Open University Press, Buckingham (1997)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ellul, J.: The technological society (Trans. Wilkinson, J.). Vintage Books, New York (1964)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mowshowitz, A.: The Conquest of Will: Information Processing in Human Affairs. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1976)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Postman, N.: Technopoly: The Surrender of Culture to Technology. Vintage Books, New York (1993)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ellul, J.: The Technological Bluff. Grand Rapids. Eerdmans Publishing Co., MI (1990)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Freier, N.G., Consolvo, S., Kahn, P., Smith, I., Friedman, B.: A Value Sensitive Design Investigation of Privacy for Location-Enhanced Computing. In: CHI 2005 Workshop on Quality. Exploring Wider Implications of HCI in Practice, Value(s), and Choice (2005)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Epp, T.D.: Person-centred dementia care: A vision to be refined. The Canadian Alzheimer Disease Review 5 (2003)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dahl, Y., Holbø, K.: Value biases of sensor-based assistive technology: case study of a GPS tracking system used in dementia care. In: Proceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems Conference (DIS 2012), pp. 572–581. ACM, New York (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Astell, A.: Technology and personhood in dementia care. Quality in Ageing 7, 15–25 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Baldwin, C.: Technology, dementia, and ethics: Rethinking the issues. Disability Studies Quarterly 25 (2005)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Astell, A., Alm, N., Gowans, G., Ellis, M., Dye, R., Vaughan, P.: Involving older peo-ple with dementia and their carers in designing computer based support systems: some methodological considerations. Univ. Access. Inf. Soc. 8, 49–58 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Donaldsom, J.M., Watson, R.: Loneliness in elderly people: an important area for nursing research. Journal of Advanced Nursing 25(5), 952–959 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Routasalo, P., Pitkala, K.H.: Loneliness among older people. Reviews in Clinical Gerontology 13, 303–311 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hauge, S., Kirkevold, M.: Older Norwegians’ understanding of loneliness. International Journal Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being 5 (2010)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mathisen, B.M., Olalde, I., Kofod-Petersen, A.: Co-Living social community for elderly. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Innovative Internet Community Systems (2012)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Gulbrandsen, S.K., Fikkan, E., Grunt, E., Mehl, K., Shamsolketabi, S., Singh, J., Vrucinic, M., Mathisen, B.M., Kofod-Petersen, A.: Social Network for Elderly. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Innovative Internet Community Systems (2012)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yngve Dahl
    • 1
  • Babak Farshchian
    • 1
  • Anders Kofod-Petersen
    • 1
  • Silje Bøthun
    • 2
  • Kristine Holbø
    • 2
  • Jarl Kåre Reitan
    • 2
  1. 1.SINTEF ICTTrondheimNorway
  2. 2.SINTEF Technology and SocietyTrondheimNorway

Personalised recommendations