Advertisement

Introducing an Information System for Successful Support of Selective Attention in Online Courses

  • Martin Ebner
  • Josef Wachtler
  • Andreas Holzinger
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8011)

Abstract

Human learning processes are strongly depending on attention of each single learner. Due to this fact any measurement helping to increase students’ attention is from high importance. Till now there are some developments called Audience-Response-Systems only available for face-to-face education even for masses. In this publication we introduce a web-based information system which is also usable for online-systems. Students’ attention will be conserved based on different interaction forms during the live stream of a lecture. The evaluation pointed out that the system helps to enlarge the attention of each single participant.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Shiffrin, R.M., Gardner, G.T.: Visual processing capacity and attentional control. Journal of Experimental Psychology 93(1), 72–82 (1972)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Moran, J., Desimone, R.: Selective attention gates visual processing in the extrastriate cortex. Science 229, 782–784 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Heinze, H.J., Mangun, G.R., Burchert, W., Hinrichs, H., Scholz, M., Münte, T.F., Gös, A., Scherg, M., Johannes, S., Hundeshagen, H., Gazzaniga, M.S., Hillyard, S.A.: Combined spatial and temporal imaging of brain activity during visual selective attention in humans. Nature 372, 543–546 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Spitzer, H., Desimone, R., Moran, J.: Increased attention enhances both behavioral and neuronal performance. Science 240, 338–340 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Carr-Chellman, A., Duchastel, P.: The ideal online course. British Journal of Educational Technology 31(3), 229–241 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tobin, B.: Audience response systems, stanford university school of medicine (2005), http://med.stanford.edu/irt/edtech/contacts/documents/2005-11_AAMC_tobin_audience_response_systems.pdf (accessed October 9, 2012)
  7. 7.
    Ebner, M.: Introducing live microblogging: how single presentations can be enhanced by the mass. Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching 2(1), 91–100 (2009)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Stowell, J.R., Nelson, J.M.: Benefits of electronic audience response systems on student participation, learning, and emotion. Teaching of Psychology 34(4), 253–258 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Silliman, S.E., Mcwilliams, L.: Observations on benefits/limitations of an audience response system. In: Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, Salt Lake City, Utah, June 20-23 (2004)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Latessa, R., Mouw, D.: Use of an audience response system to augment interactive learning. Family Medicine 37(1), 12–14 (2005)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Yu, Y., Crumiller, M., Knight, B., Kaplan, E.: Estimating the amount of information carried by a neuronal population. Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience 4(10) (2010)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Broadbent, D.E.: A mechanical model for human attention and immediate memory. Psychological Review 64(3), 205–215 (1957)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Broadbent, D.E.: Perception and communication (1958)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Atkinson, R.C., Shiffrin, R.M.: The control processes of short-term memory. Institute for Mathematical Studies in the Social Sciences, Stanford University (1971)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Moreno, R., Mayer, R.E.: Cognitive principles of multimedia learning: The role of modality and contiguity. Journal of Educational Psychology 91(2), 358 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Holzinger, A.: Multimedia basics. Learning, cognitive fundamentals of multimedial information systems, vol. 2. Laxmi, New Delhi (2002)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Holzinger, A., Kickmeier-Rust, M., Albert, D.: Dynamic media in computer science education; content complexity and learning performance: Is less more. Educational Technology & Society 11(1), 279–290 (2008)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wickens, C., Lee, J., Liu, Y., Gordon-Becker, S.: Introduction to Human Factors Engineering, 2nd edn. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River (2004)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Holzinger, A.: Biomedical Informatics: Computational Sciences meets Life Sciences. BoD, Norderstedt (2012)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Django Team: Django documentation, https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/1.4/
  21. 21.
    Holovaty, A., Kaplan-Moss, J.: The django book, http://www.djangobook.com/

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Martin Ebner
    • 1
  • Josef Wachtler
    • 1
  • Andreas Holzinger
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute for Information System and Computer MediaGraz University of TechnologyAustria

Personalised recommendations