Advertisement

Design Principles of Open Innovation Concept – Universal Design Viewpoint

  • Moyen Mohammad Mustaquim
  • Tobias Nyström
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8009)

Abstract

The concept of open innovation is becoming an increasingly popular topic of interest and seems to promise a lot in organizational development. However, to date there are no certain design principles that can be followed by organizations on how to use open innovation successfully. In this paper seven design principles of open innovation concept have been proposed. The derived principles are the outcome which is based on the principles of universal design. The open innovation design, based on these principles could create better business values and new business strategies. Finally a theoretical framework is also proposed that shows how to use these principles for successful open innovation design.

Keywords

Open innovation Universal Design Design Principles for Open Innovation Design Principles 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Barney, J.: Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of management 17(1), 99–120 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chesbrough, H.: The era of open innovation. Sloan Management Review 44(3), 35–41 (2003)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mustaquim, M.: Gaze Interaction – A Challenge for Inclusive Design Innovative Computing Technology. In: Pichappan, P., Ahmadi, H., Ariwa, E. (eds.) INCT 2011. CCIS, vol. 241, pp. 244–250. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chesbrough, H., Rosenblom, R.S.: The role of the business model in capturing value from innovation: evidence from Xerox Corporation’s technology spin-off companies. Industrial and Corporate Change 11(3), 529–555 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Porter, M.E.: What is strategy? Harvard business review 74(4), 61–78 (1996)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Schumpeter, J.: Business Cycles: A theoretical, historical and statistical analysis of the Capitalist process. McGraw-Hill, New York (1939)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dahlander, L., Gann, D.M.: How open is innovation? Research Policy 39(6), 699–709 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Trott, P., Hartmann, D.: Why ‘open innovation’ is old wine in new bottles. International Journal of Innovation Management 13(4), 715–736 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chesbrough, H., Vanhaverbeke, W., West, J.: Open Innovation Researching a New Paradigm. Oxford University press, New York (2006)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bonabeau, E.: Decisions 2.0: The Power of Collective Intelligence. MIT Sloan Management Review 50(2), 45–52 (2009)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Huston, L., Sakkab, N.: Connect and develop: Inside Procter & Gamble’s new model for innovation. Harvard Business Review 84(3), 58–66 (2006)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Di Gangi, P.M., Wasko, M.: Steal my idea! Organizational adoption of user innovations from a user innovation community: A case study of Dell Idea Storm. Decision Support Systems 48(1), 303–312 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Von Hippel, E.: Innovation by user communities: Learning from open-source software. MIT Sloan Management Review 42(4), 82–86 (2001)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Baldwin, C., Hienerth, C., et al.: How user innovations become commercial products: A theoretical investigation and case study. Research Policy 35(9), 1291–1313 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Franke, N., Shah, S.: How communities support innovative activities: an exploration of assistance and sharing among end-users. Research Policy 32(1), 157–178 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Center for Accessible Housing. Accessible environments: Toward universal design. Raleigh: North Carolina State University (1995)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Procter & Gamble, “Connect + Develop”, http://www.pg.com/connect_develop/why_partner_with_pg.shtml (accessed January 27, 2013)
  18. 18.
    Chesbrough, H.: Managing Open Innovation. Research Technology Management 47(1), 23–26 (2004)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Moyen Mohammad Mustaquim
    • 1
  • Tobias Nyström
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Informatics and MediaUppsala UniversityUppsalaSweden

Personalised recommendations