Skip to main content

Fuzzy Implication Classes Satisfying a Boolean-Like Law

  • Conference paper
  • 1151 Accesses

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 228))

Abstract

Properties that are always true in the classical theory (Boolean laws) have been extended to fuzzy theory and so-called Boolean-like laws. The fact that they do not remain valid in any standard fuzzy set theory has induced a broad investigation. In this paper we show the sufficient and necessary conditions that a fundamental Boolean-like law—yI(x,y)—holds in fuzzy logics. We focus the investigation on the following classes of fuzzy implications: (S,N)-, R-, QL-, D-, (N,T)-, f-, g- and h-implications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alsina, C., Trillas, E.: On iterative Boolean-like laws of fuzzy sets. In: EUSFLAT Conf., pp. 389–394 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Alsina, C., Trillas, E.: On the law S(S(x,y),T((x,y))) = S(x,y) of fuzzy logic. Fuzzy Optim. Decis. Mak. 6(2), 99–107 (2007)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Baczyński, M., Jayaram, M.: Fuzzy Implications. STUDFUZZ, vol. 231. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Baczy\(\acute{n}\)ski, M., Jayaram, M.: (S,N)- and R-implications: a state-of-art survey. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 159(14), 1836–1859 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Baczy\(\acute{n}\)ski, M., Jayaram, B.: QL-implications: some properties and intersections. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 161(2), 158–188 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Baldwin, J., Pilsworth, B.: Axiomatic approach to implication for approximate reasoning with fuzzy logic. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 3(2), 193–219 (1980)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Balasubramaniam, J., Rao, C.J.M.: On the distributivity of implication operators over T and S norms. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Systems 12(2), 194–198 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Balasubramaniam, J.: On the law of importation \((x \wedge y) \longrightarrow z \equiv (x \longrightarrow (y \longrightarrow z))\) in fuzzy logic. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Systems 16(1), 130–144 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Bandler, W., Kohout, L.: Fuzzy power sets and fuzzy implication operators. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 4(1), 13–30 (1980)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Bedregal, B.: A normal form which preserves tautologies and contradictions in a class of fuzzy logics. J. Algorithms 62(3-4), 135–147 (2007)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Bedregal, B., Cruz, A.: A characterization of classic-like fuzzy semantics. Logic Journal of the IGPL 16(4), 357–370 (2008)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Bedregal, B., Reiser, R.H.S., Dimuro, G.P.: Xor-implications and E-implications: Classes of fuzzy implications based on fuzzy xor. Electr. Notes Theor. Comput. Sci. 247, 5–18 (2009)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Bustince, H., Burillo, P., Soria, F.: Automorphism, negations and implication operators. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 134(1), 209–229 (2003)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Cruz, A., Bedregal, B., Santiago, R.H.N.: The law x≤ I(y,x) and the three main classes of fuzzy implications. In: IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE), pp. 1–5 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Drewniak, J.: Invariant fuzzy implications. Soft Comput. 10(6), 506–513 (2006)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Fodor, J., Roubens, M.: Fuzzy preference modelling and multicriteria decision support. Kluwer Academic Publishers (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Klement, E., Mesiar, R., Pap, E.: Triangular Norms. Triangular Norms. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2000)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Klir, G.J., Yuan, B.: Fuzzy Sets and Fuzzy Logic Theory and Applications. Prentice Hall PTR, New Jersey (1995)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Mamdani, E.H.: Application of fuzzy logic to approximate reasoning using linguistic synthesis. IEEE Trans. Computers 26(12), 1182–1191 (1977)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Mas, M., Monserrat, M., Torrens, J.: Ql-implications versus D-implications. Kybernetika 42(3), 315–366 (2006)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Mas, M., Monserrat, M., Torrens, J., Trillas, E.: A survey of fuzzy implication functions. IEEE Trans. on Fuzzy Systems 15(6), 1107–1121 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Massanet, S., Torrens, J.: On a new class of fuzzy implications: h-implications and generalizations. Information Sciences 181(11), 2111–2127 (2011)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Rasiowa, H., Sikorski, R.: The Mathematics of Metamathematics. Monografie matematyczne. Polska Akademia Nauk. (1963)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Reiser, R.H.S., Bedregal, B.C., Dimuro, G.P.: Interval-valued D-implications. Tend. Mat. Apl. Comput. (TEMA) 10(1), 63–74 (2009)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Reiser, R.H.S., Bedregal, B.C., Santiago, R.H.N., Dimuro, G.P.: Analysing the relationship between interval-valued D-implications and interval-valued QL-implications. Tend. Mat. Apl. Comput. (TEMA) 11(1), 89–100 (2010)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. Ruan, D., Kerre, E.E.: Fuzzy implication operators and generalized fuzzy method of cases. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 54(1), 23–37 (1993)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. Sainio, E., Turunen, R.M.E.: A characterization of fuzzy implications generated by generalized quantifiers. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 159(4), 491–499 (2008)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  28. Shi, Y., Ruan, D., Kerre, E.E.: On the characterizations of fuzzy implications satisfying I(x, y)=I(x, I(x, y)). Information Sciences 177(14), 2954–2970 (2007)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  29. Shi, Y., Gasse, B.V., Kerre, E.E.: On dependencies and independencies of fuzzy implication axioms. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 161(10), 1388–1405 (2010)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  30. Shi, Y., Van Gasse, B., Ruan, D., Kerre, E.: On a new class of implications in fuzzy logic. In: Hüllermeier, E., Kruse, R., Hoffmann, F. (eds.) IPMU 2010, Part I. CCIS, vol. 80, pp. 525–534. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  31. Trillas, E., Valverde, L.: On some functionally expressable implications for fuzzy set theory. In: Proc. 3rd Inter. Seminar on Fuzzy Set Theory, Linz, Austria, pp. 173–190 (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Trillas, E., Alsina, C.: Standard theories of fuzzy sets with the law (μ ∧ σ′)′ = σ ∨ (μ′ ∧ σ′). Int. J. Approx. Reasoning 37(2), 87–92 (2004)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  33. Trillas, E., Alsina, C.: On the law [(p ∨ q) → r] = [(p → r) ∧ (q → r)] in fuzzy logic. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy System 10(1), 84–98 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Yager, R.: On the implication operator in fuzzy logic. Information Sciences 31(2), 141–164 (1983)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  35. Yager, R.: On some new classes of implication operators and their role in approximate reasoning. Information Sciences 167(1-4), 193–216 (2004)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  36. Zadeh, L.A.: Outline of a new approach to the analysis of complex systems and decision processes. IEEE Trans. on System, Man and Cybernetics 3(1), 28–44 (1973)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anderson Cruz .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Cruz, A., Bedregal, B., Santiago, R. (2013). Fuzzy Implication Classes Satisfying a Boolean-Like Law. In: Bustince, H., Fernandez, J., Mesiar, R., Calvo, T. (eds) Aggregation Functions in Theory and in Practise. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 228. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39165-1_41

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39165-1_41

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-39164-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-39165-1

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics