Skip to main content

Towards an Understanding of Affect and Knowledge from Student Interaction with an Intelligent Tutoring System

  • Conference paper
Book cover Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED 2013)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 7926))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Csikszentmihalyi’s Flow theory states that a balance between challenge and skill leads to high engagement, overwhelming challenge leads to anxiety or frustration, and insufficient challenge leads to boredom. In this paper, we test this theory within the context of student interaction with an intelligent tutoring system. Automated detectors of student affect and knowledge were developed, validated, and applied to a large data set. The results did not match Flow theory: boredom was more common for poorly-known material, and frustration was common both for very difficult material and very easy material. These results suggest that design for optimal engagement within online learning may require further study of the factors leading students to become bored on difficult material, and frustrated on very well-known material.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Acee, T.W., Kim, H., Kim, H.J., Kim, J., Hsiang-Ning, R.C., Kim, M.: Academic Boredom in Under- and Overchallenging Situations. Contemporary Ed. Psy. 35, 17–27 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Baker, R.S.J.d., Corbett, A.T., Gowda, S.M., Wagner, A.Z., MacLaren, B.A., Kauffman, L.R., Mitchell, A.P., Giguere, S.: Contextual Slip and Prediction of Student Performance after Use of an Intelligent Tutor. In: De Bra, P., Kobsa, A., Chin, D. (eds.) UMAP 2010. LNCS, vol. 6075, pp. 52–63. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Baker, R.S.J.d., D’Mello, S.K., Rodrigo, M.M.T., Graesser, A.C.: Better to Be Frustrated than Bored: The Incidence, Persistence, and Impact of Learners’ Cognitive-Affective States during Interactions with Three Different Computer-Based Learning Environments. Int’l. J. Human-Computer Studies 68(4), 223–241 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Baker, R.S.J.d., Gowda, S.M., Wixon, M., Kalka, J., Wagner, A.Z., Salvi, A., Aleven, V., Kusbit, G., Ocumpaugh, J., Rossi, L.: Towards Sensor-Free Affect Detection in Cognitive Tutor Algebra. In: EDM 2012, pp. 126–133 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Conati, C., Maclaren, H.: Empirically Building and Evaluating a Probabilistic Model of User Affect. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 19(3), 267–303 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Corbett, A.T., Anderson, J.R.: Knowledge Tracing: Modeling the Acquisition of Procedural Knowledge. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 4(4), 253–278 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Craig, S.D., Graesser, A.C., Sullins, J., Gholson, B.: Affect and Learning: An Exploratory Look into the Role of Affect in Learning. J. of Educational Media 29, 241–250 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Csikszentmihalyi, M.: Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. Harper-Row (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Csikszentmihalyi, M., Csikszentmihalyi, I.S.: Optimal Experience: Psychological Studies of Flow in Consciousness. Cambridge University, Cambridge (1988)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  10. D’Mello, S.K., Craig, S.K., Gholson, B., Franklin, S., Picard, R.W., Graesser, A.C.: Integrating Affect Sensors in an Intelligent Tutoring System. In: Intelligent User Interface 2005. AMC Press (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  11. D’Mello, S.K., Craig, S.D., Witherspoon, A.W., McDaniel, B.T., Graesser, A.C.: Automatic Detection of Learner’s Affect from Conversational Cues. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 18(1-2), 45–80 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Dragon, T., Arroyo, I., Woolf, B.P., Burleson, W., el Kaliouby, R., Eydgahi, H.: Viewing Student Affect and Learning through Classroom Observation and Physical Sensors. In: Woolf, B.P., Aïmeur, E., Nkambou, R., Lajoie, S. (eds.) ITS 2008. LNCS, vol. 5091, pp. 29–39. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Kort, B., Reilly, R., Picard, R.: An Affective Model of Interplay between Emotions and Learning: Reengineering Educational Pedagogy—Building A Learning Companion. In: IEEE Int’l. Conf. on Advanced Learning Technology 2001, pp. 43–48 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lehman, B., D’Mello, S.K., Person, N.: All Alone with your Emotions: An Analysis of Student Emotions during Effortful Problem Solving Activities. In: Workshop on Emotional and Cognitive Issues in ITS, Int’l Conf. on Intelligent Tutoring Systems (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Miserandino, M.: Children Who Do Well in School: Individual Differences in Perceived Competence and Autonomy in Above-Average Children. J. Ed. Psych. 88, 203–214 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Pardos, Z., Baker, R.S.J.d., San Pedro, M.O.Z., Gowda, S.M., Gowda, S.: Affective States and State Tests: Investigating How Affect throughout the School Year Predicts End of Year Learning Outcomes. In: Learning Analytics and Knowledge (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Pavlik Jr., P.I.: The Microeconomics of Learning: Optimizing Paired-Associate Memory. Doctoral Dissertation, Carnegie Mellon University (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Pavlik Jr., P.I., Presson, N., Dozzi, G., Wu, S., MacWhinney, B., Koedinger, K.R.: The FaCT (Fact and Concept Training) System: A New Tool Linking Cognitive Science with Educators. In: Proc. Cognitive Science Society 2007, 397–402 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Daniels, L.M., Stupnisky, R.H., Perry, R.P.: Boredom in Achievement Settings: Exploring Control-Value Antecedents and Performance Outcomes of a Neglected Emotion. J. Educational Psychology 102(3), 531–549 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Pilke, E.M.: Flow Experiences in Information Technology Use. Int’l. J. Human-Computer Studies 61(3), 347–357 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Razzaq, L., Feng, M., Nuzzo-Jones, G., Heffernan, N.T.: The Assistment Project: Blending Assessment and Assisting. In: AIED 2005, pp. 555–562 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Rodrigo, M.M.T., Baker, R.S.J.d.: Coarse-Grained Detection of Student Frustration in an Introductory Programming Course. In: ACM ICER 2009 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Rodrigo, M.M.T., Baker, R., Jadud, M., Amarra, A., Dy, T., Espejo-Lahoz, M., Lim, S., Pascua, S., Sugay, J.: Affective and Behavioral Predictors of Novice Programmer Achievement. In: ACM-SIGCSE 2009, pp. 156–160 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Sabourin, J., Mott, B., Lester, J.: Modeling Learner Affect with Theoretically Grounded Dynamic Bayesian Networks. In: D’Mello, S., Graesser, A., Schuller, B., Martin, J.-C. (eds.) ACII 2011, Part I. LNCS, vol. 6974, pp. 286–295. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. Sedighian, K.: Challenge-Driven Learning: A Model for Children’s Multimedia Mathematics Learning Environments. In: ED-MEDIA 1997 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Sessink, O., Beeftink, H., Tramper, J., Hartog, R.: Proteus: A Lecturer-Friendly Adaptive Tutoring System. J. Interactive Learning Research 18(4), 533–554 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Shernoff, D.J., Csikszentmihalyi, M.: Flow in Schools: Cultivating Engaged Learners and Optimal Learning Environments. In: Gilman, R., Huebner, E.S., Furlong, M. (eds.) Handbook of Positive Psychology in Schools, pp. 131–145. Routledge, New York (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Shernoff, D.J., Csikszentmihalyi, M., Shneider, B., Shernoff, E.S.: Student Engagement in High School Classrooms from the Perspective of Flow Theory. School Psychology Quarterly 18(2), 158 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

San Pedro, M.O.Z., Baker, R.S.J.d., Gowda, S.M., Heffernan, N.T. (2013). Towards an Understanding of Affect and Knowledge from Student Interaction with an Intelligent Tutoring System. In: Lane, H.C., Yacef, K., Mostow, J., Pavlik, P. (eds) Artificial Intelligence in Education. AIED 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 7926. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39112-5_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39112-5_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-39111-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-39112-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics