Skip to main content

Evaluating Asymmetric Decision Problems with Binary Constraint Trees

  • Conference paper
Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty (ECSQARU 2013)

Abstract

This paper proposes the use of binary trees in order to represent and evaluate asymmetric decision problems with Influence Diagrams (IDs). Constraint rules are used to represent the asymmetries between the variables of the ID. These rules and the potentials involved in IDs will be represented using binary trees. The application of these rules can reduce the size of the potentials of the ID. As a consequence the efficiency of the inference algorithms will be improved.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bielza, C., Shenoy, P.P.: A comparison of graphical techniques for asymmetric decision problems. Management Science 45(11), 1552–1569 (1999)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Boutilier, C., Friedman, N., Goldszmidt, M., Koller, D.: Context-specific independence in Bayesian networks. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Uncertainty in AI, pp. 115–123. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc. (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cabañas, R., Gómez, M., Cano, A.: Approximate inference in influence diagrams using binary trees. In: Proceedings of the Sixth European Workshop on Probabilistic Graphical Models, PGM 2012 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Call, H.J., Miller, W.A.: A comparison of approaches and implementations for automating decision analysis. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 30(1), 115–162 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cano, A., Gómez-Olmedo, M., Moral, S.: Approximate inference in Bayesian networks using binary probability trees. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning 52(1), 49–62 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Cano, A., Moral, S., Salmerón, A.: Penniless propagation in join trees. International Journal of Intelligent Systems 15(11), 1027–1059 (2000)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Covaliu, Z., Oliver, R.M.: Representation and solution of decision problems using sequential decision diagrams. Management Science 41(12), 1860–1881 (1995)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Demirer, R., Shenoy, P.P.: Sequential valuation networks for asymmetric decision problems. European Journal of Operational Research 169(1), 286–309 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Díez, F.J., Luque, M.: Representing decision problems with decision analysis networks. Technical report, UNED, Madrid, Spain (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gómez, M., Cano, A.: Applying numerical trees to evaluate asymmetric decision problems. In: Nielsen, T.D., Zhang, N.L. (eds.) ECSQARU 2003. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2711, pp. 196–207. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Howard, R.A., Matheson, J.E.: Influence diagram retrospective. Decision Analysis 2(3), 144–147 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Jensen, F.V., Nielsen, T.D.: Bayesian networks and decision graphs. Springer (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lucas, P.J.F., Taal, B.: Computer-based decision support in the management of primary gastric non-hodgkin lymphoma. UU-CS, (1998-33) (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Madsen, A.L., Jensen, F.V.: Lazy evaluation of symmetric Bayesian decision problems. In: Proceedings of the 15th Conference on Uncertainty in AI, pp. 382–390. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc. (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Nielsen, T.D., Jensen, F.V.: Representing and solving asymmetric Bayesian decision problems. In: Proceedings of the Sixteenth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, pp. 416–425. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc. (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Pearl, J.: Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems: Networks of Plausble Inference. Morgan Kaufmann Pub. (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Qi, R., Zhang, L., Poole, D.: Solving asymmetric decision problems with influence diagrams. In: Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, pp. 491–497. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc. (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Shachter, R., Fung, R.: Contingent influence diagrams. Advanced Decision Systems (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Shachter, R.D.: Evaluating influence diagrams. Operations Research, 871–882 (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Shenoy, P.P.: Valuation network representation and solution of asymmetric decision problems. European Journal of Operational Research 121(3), 579–608 (2000)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Smith, J.E., Holtzman, S., Matheson, J.E.: Structuring conditional relationships in influence diagrams. Operations Research 41(2), 280–297 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhang, N.L., Poole, D.: Exploiting causal independence in Bayesian network inference. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 5, 301–328 (1996)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Cabañas, R., Gómez-Olmedo, M., Cano, A. (2013). Evaluating Asymmetric Decision Problems with Binary Constraint Trees. In: van der Gaag, L.C. (eds) Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty. ECSQARU 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 7958. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39091-3_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39091-3_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-39090-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-39091-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics