Abstract
An important aspect of decision making is that a decision is not made at a time assuming that the decision maker (DM) has all relevant information at hand at the same time. On the contrary making a decision results from a process during which (non) relevant and possibly conflicting information come at different instant. Multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) is a typical case of a dynamic process. We show in this paper how argumentation can help to represent this dynamics.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Amgoud, L., Bonnefon, J.-F., Prade, H.: An argumentation-based approach to multiple criteria decision. In: Godo, L. (ed.) ECSQARU 2005. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3571, pp. 269–280. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
Amgoud, L., Prade, H.: Using arguments for making and explaining decisions. Artificial Intelligence 173, 413–436 (2009)
Bouyssou, D., Marchant, T., Pirlot, M., Tsoukiàs, A., Vincke, P.: Evaluation and decision models with multiple criteria: Stepping stones for the analyst. International Series in Operations Research and Management Science. Springer (2006)
Coulson, A.S., Glasspool, D., Fox, J., Emery, J.: Rags: A novel approach to computerized genetic risk assessment and decision support from pedigrees. Methods of Information in Medicine 40, 315–322 (2001)
Delecroix, F., Morge, M., Routier, J.-C.: A virtual selling agent which is persuasive and adaptive (2012)
Fatima, S., Jennings, N., Wooldridge, M.: An agenda-based framework for multi-issue negotiation. Artificial Intelligence Journal 152, 1–45 (2004)
Huang, J., Fox, J., Gordon, C., Jackson-Smale, A.: Symbolic decision support in medical car. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine 5, 415–430 (1993)
Osborne, M., Rubinstein, A.: A Course in Game Theory. MIT Press, Cambridge (1994)
Ouerdane, W., Dimopoulos, Y., Liapis, K., Moraitis, P.: Towards automating decision aiding through argumentation. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis 18, 289–309 (2011)
Pruitt, D.: Negotiation Behaviour. Academic Press Inc., London (1982)
Rahwan, I., Amgoud, L.: An argumentation-based approach for practical reasoning. In: 5th International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents & Multi Agent Systems, AAMAS 2006, Hakodate, Japan, pp. 347–354 (2006)
Raiffa, H.: The Art and Science of Negotiation. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1982)
Simon, H.: A behavioural model of rational choice. Quarterly Journal of Economics 69, 99–118 (1955)
Tsoukiàs, A.: On the concept of decision aiding process. Annals of Operations Research 154, 3–27 (2007)
Visser, W., Hindriks, K.V., Jonker, C.M.: An argumentation framework for qualitative multi-criteria preferences. In: Modgil, S., Oren, N., Toni, F. (eds.) TAFA 2011. LNCS, vol. 7132, pp. 85–98. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Labreuche, C. (2013). Argumentation Based Dynamic Multiple Criteria Decision Making. In: van der Gaag, L.C. (eds) Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty. ECSQARU 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 7958. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39091-3_30
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39091-3_30
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-39090-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-39091-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)