Skip to main content

Structure Approximation of Most Probable Explanations in Bayesian Networks

  • Conference paper
Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty (ECSQARU 2013)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 7958))

Abstract

Typically, when one discusses approximation algorithms for (NP-hard) problems (like Traveling Salesperson, Vertex Cover, Knapsack), one refers to algorithms that return a solution whose value is (at least ideally) close to optimal; e.g., a tour with almost minimal length, a vertex cover of size just above minimal, or a collection of objects that has close to maximal value. In contrast, one might also be interested in approximation algorithms that return solutions that resemble the optimal solutions, i.e., whose structure is akin to the optimal solution, like a tour that is almost similar to the optimal tour, a vertex cover that differs in only a few vertices from the optimal cover, or a collection that is similar to the optimal collection. In this paper, we discuss structure-approximation of the problem of finding the most probable explanation of observations in Bayesian networks, i.e., finding a joint value assignment that looks like the most probable one, rather than has an almost as high value. We show that it is NP-hard to obtain the value of just a single variable of the most probable explanation. However, when partial orders on the values of the variables are available, we can improve on these results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abdelbar, A.M., Hedetniemi, S.M.: Approximating MAPs for belief networks is NP-hard and other theorems. Artificial Intelligence 102, 21–38 (1998)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Baker, C.L., Saxe, R., Tenenbaum, J.B.: Action understanding as inverse planning. Cognition 113(3), 329–349 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bodlaender, H.L., van den Eijkhof, F., van der Gaag, L.C.: On the complexity of the MPA problem in probabilistic networks. In: van Harmelen, F. (ed.) Proceedings of the 15th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 675–679 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chater, N., Oaksford, M.: Ten years of the rational analysis of cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 3, 57–65 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cooper, G.F.: The computational complexity of probabilistic inference using Bayesian belief networks. Artificial Intelligence 42(2), 393–405 (1990)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Feige, U., Langberg, M., Nissim, K.: On the hardness of approximating NP witnesses. In: Jansen, K., Khuller, S. (eds.) APPROX 2000. LNCS, vol. 1913, pp. 120–131. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Garey, M.R., Johnson, D.S.: Computers and Intractability. A Guide to the Theory of NP-Completeness. W. H. Freeman and Co., San Francisco (1979)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Gemela, J.: Financial analysis using Bayesian networks. Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry 17, 57–67 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Hamilton, M., Müller, M., van Rooij, I., Wareham, T.: Approximating solution structure. In: Demaine, E., Gutin, G.Z., Marx, D., Stege, U. (eds.) Structure Theory and FPT Algorithmics for Graphs, Digraphs and Hypergraphs, Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, vol. 07281 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jensen, F.V., Nielsen, T.D.: Bayesian Networks and Decision Graphs, 2nd edn. Springer, New York (2007)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Kumar, R., Sivakumar, D.: Proofs, codes, and polynomial-time reducibilities. In: Proceedings of the Fourteenth Annual Conference on Computational Complexity, pp. 46–53. IEEE Computer Society (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kwisthout, J.: Most probable explanations in Bayesian networks: Complexity and tractability. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning 52(9), 1452–1469 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Kwisthout, J.: Structure approximation of most probable explanations in Bayesian networks. In: Uiterwijk, J.W.H.M., Roos, N., Winands, M.H.M. (eds.) Proceedings of the 24th Benelux Conference on Artificial Intelligence (BNAIC 2012), pp. 131–138 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lacave, C., Díez, F.J.: A review of explanation methods for Bayesian networks. The Knowledge Engineering Review 17(2), 107–127 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lucas, P.J.F., de Bruijn, N., Schurink, K., Hoepelman, A.: A probabilistic and decision-theoretic approach to the management of infectious disease at the ICU. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine 3, 251–279 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Millgram, E.: Coherence: The price of the ticket. Journal of Philosophy 97, 82–93 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Pearl, J.: Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems: Networks of Plausible Inference. Morgan Kaufmann, Palo Alto (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Shimony, S.E.: Finding MAPs for belief networks is NP-hard. Artificial Intelligence 68(2), 399–410 (1994)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Sticha, P.J., Buede, D.M., Rees, R.L.: Bayesian model of the effect of personality in predicting decisionmaker behavior. In: van der Gaag, L.C., Almond, R. (eds.) Proceedings of the Fourth Bayesian Modelling Applications Workshop (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  20. van der Gaag, L.C., Renooij, S., Geenen, P.L.: Lattices for studying monotonicity of Bayesian networks. In: Studený, M., Vomlel, J. (eds.) Proceedings of the Third European Workshop on Probabilistic Graphical Models, pp. 99–106 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  21. van der Gaag, L.C., Renooij, S., Witteman, C.L.M., Aleman, B.M.P., Taal, B.G.: Probabilities for a probabilistic network: a case study in oesophageal cancer. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine 25, 123–148 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. van Rooij, I., Kwisthout, J., Blokpoel, M., Szymanik, J., Wareham, T., Toni, I.: Communicating intentions: Computationally easy or difficult? Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 5(52), 1–18 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  23. van Rooij, I., Wareham, T.: Intractability and approximation of optimization theories of cognition. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 56(4), 232–247 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kwisthout, J. (2013). Structure Approximation of Most Probable Explanations in Bayesian Networks. In: van der Gaag, L.C. (eds) Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty. ECSQARU 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 7958. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39091-3_29

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39091-3_29

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-39090-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-39091-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics