Abstract
In this paper we study the role of cliquewidth in succinct representation of Boolean functions. Our main statement is the following: Let Z be a Boolean circuit having cliquewidth k. Then there is another circuit Z * computing the same function as Z having treewidth at most 18k + 2 and which has at most 4|Z| gates where |Z| is the number of gates of Z. In this sense, cliquewidth is not more ‘powerful’ than treewidth for the purpose of representation of Boolean functions. We believe this is quite a surprising fact because it contrasts the situation with graphs where an upper bound on the treewidth implies an upper bound on the cliquewidth but not vice versa.
We demonstrate the usefulness of the new theorem for knowledge compilation. In particular, we show that a circuit Z of cliquewidth k can be compiled into a Decomposable Negation Normal Form (dnnf) of size O(918k k 2|Z|) and the same runtime. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first result on efficient knowledge compilation parameterized by cliquewidth of a Boolean circuit.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Corneil, D.G., Rotics, U.: On the relationship between clique-width and treewidth. SIAM J. Comput. 34(4), 825–847 (2005)
Courcelle, B., Makowsky, J.A., Rotics, U.: Linear time solvable optimization problems on graphs of bounded clique-width. Theory Comput. Syst. 33(2), 125–150 (2000)
Darwiche, A.: Decomposable negation normal form. J. ACM 48(4), 608–647 (2001)
Darwiche, A.: On the tractable counting of theory models and its application to truth maintenance and belief revision. Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 11(1-2), 11–34 (2001)
Darwiche, A.: Sdd: A new canonical representation of propositional knowledge bases. In: IJCAI, pp. 819–826 (2011)
Darwiche, A., Marquis, P.: A knowledge compilation map. J. Artif. Intell. Res. (JAIR) 17, 229–264 (2002)
Dvorák, W., Szeider, S., Woltran, S.: Reasoning in argumentation frameworks of bounded clique-width. In: COMMA, pp. 219–230 (2010)
Fellows, M.R., Rosamond, F.A., Rotics, U., Szeider, S.: Clique-width is NP-complete. SIAM J. Discrete Math. 23(2), 909–939 (2009)
Ferrara, A., Pan, G., Vardi, M.Y.: Treewidth in verification: Local vs. Global. In: Sutcliffe, G., Voronkov, A. (eds.) LPAR 2005. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3835, pp. 489–503. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
Gurski, F., Wanke, E.: The tree-width of clique-width bounded graphs without K n,n . In: Brandes, U., Wagner, D. (eds.) WG 2000. LNCS, vol. 1928, pp. 196–205. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)
Hlinený, P., Oum, S.I.: Finding branch-decompositions and rank-decompositions. SIAM J. Comput. 38(3), 1012–1032 (2008)
Oum, S.I.: Rank-width is less than or equal to branch-width. Journal of Graph Theory 57(3), 239–244 (2008)
Oum, S.I., Seymour, P.D.: Approximating clique-width and branch-width. J. Comb. Theory, Ser. B 96(4), 514–528 (2006)
Jha, A.K., Suciu, D.: On the tractability of query compilation and bounded treewidth. In: ICDT, pp. 249–261 (2012)
Kanté, M.M., Rao, M.: \(\mathbb F\)-rank-width of (edge-colored) graphs. In: Winkler, F. (ed.) CAI 2011. LNCS, vol. 6742, pp. 158–173. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Razgon, I., Petke, J. (2013). Cliquewidth and Knowledge Compilation. In: Järvisalo, M., Van Gelder, A. (eds) Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing – SAT 2013. SAT 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7962. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39071-5_25
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39071-5_25
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-39070-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-39071-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)