Skip to main content

Research Goals for Evolving the ‘Form’ User Interface Metaphor towards More Interactivity

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 7946))

Abstract

Forms have been static, document-like user interfaces (UIs) for centuries. This work proposes to evolve the ‘form’ UI metaphor towards more interactivity. Related work has proposed interactive form elements such as autocompleting or otherwise assistive input fields. But a unified concept and scientific reflection on the topic are missing. Methodologically, this work first provides a deeper understanding of forms as UI metaphor. It then presents relevant research goals for improved usability, including collaborative form filling, easier navigation in long forms, and combined input fields for comfortable data entry. Taken together, the contributions of this work are to provide a deeper understanding of forms, systematically highlight relevant research topics, and hopefully foster a scientific discussion in form design.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Wroblewski, L.: Web Form Design. Filling the Blanks. Louis Rosenfeld (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Nielsen, J.: Forms vs. Applications (2005), http://www.nngroup.com/articles/forms-vs-applications/

  3. Jarrett, C., Gaffney, G.: Forms that work. Morgan Kaufmann (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bargas-Avila, J., Brenzikofer, O., Roth, S., Tuch, A., Orsini, S., Opwis, K.: Simple but crucial user interfaces in the world wide web: Introducing 20 guidelines for usable web form design. In: Matrai, R. (ed.) User Interfaces, ch.1. InTech (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Frohlich, D., Crossfield, Gilbert: Requirements for an intelligent form-filling interface. In: People and Computers: Designing the Interface, pp. 102–116 (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Tjin-Kam-Jet, K., Trieschnigg, D., Hiemstra, D.: Free-text search over complex Web Forms. In: Hanbury, A., Rauber, A., de Vries, A.P. (eds.) IRFC 2011. LNCS, vol. 6653, pp. 94–107. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Tange, H.J., Hasman, A., de Vries Robbé, P.F., Schouten, H.C.: Medical Narratives in Electronic Medical Records. Int. J. Med. Inform. 46, 7–29 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sturm, J., Boves, L.: Effective error recovery strategies for multimodal form-filling applications. Speech Communication 45(3), 289–303 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Jacobs, S., Gebhardt, M., Kethers, S., Rzasa, W.: Filling HTML forms simultaneously: CoWeb architecture and functionality. In: Computer Networks and ISDN Systems, vol. 28(7-11), pp. 1385–1395. Elsevier (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Amrhein, D., Ivory, A.: Enable a Collaborative Experience for Html Forms. IBM (2010), http://ibm.com/developerworks/web/library/wa-twowayforms/

  11. Strobl, S., Bernhart, M., Grechenig, T.: An Experience Report on the Incremental Adoption and Evolution of an SPL in eHealth. In: Proc. 2010 ICSE Workshop on Product Line Approaches in Software Engineering, pp. 16–23. ACM (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Alty, J., Knott, R., Anderson, B., Smyth, M.: A framework for engineering metaphor at the user interface. In: Interacting with Computers, vol. 13(2), pp. 301–322 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Barr, P., Biddle, R., Noble, J.: A Semiotic Model of User-Interface Metaphor. In: Virtual, Distributed and Flexible Organisations, pp. 189–215. Springer (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Card, S., Nation, D.: Degree-of-Interest Trees: A Component of an Attention-Reactive User Interface. In: Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces, AVI 2002, pp. 231–245. ACM, New York (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Holzinger, A., Baernthaler, M., Pammer, W., Katz, H., Bjelic-Radisic, V., Ziefle, M.: Investigating paper vs. screen in real-life hospital workflows: Performance contradicts perceived superiority of paper in the user experience. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 69(9), 563–570 (2011)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Card, S., Mackinlay, J., Shneiderman, B.: Readings in Information Visualization: Using Vision to Think. Morgan Kaufmann (1999)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Harms, J. (2013). Research Goals for Evolving the ‘Form’ User Interface Metaphor towards More Interactivity. In: Holzinger, A., Ziefle, M., Hitz, M., Debevc, M. (eds) Human Factors in Computing and Informatics. SouthCHI 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7946. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39062-3_60

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39062-3_60

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-39061-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-39062-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics