Abstract
This preliminary study aims at identifying possible differences in eye movements while reading either dark text on light background or light text on dark background on-screen. To this end, eye movements during reading with two different screen technologies which are dominant in the domain of mobile e-reading devices (i.e. eInk and backlit LED), have been examined for both negative and positive contrast. Results show that for reading on electronic displays, direction of contrast (negative/positive) has no significant influence on central eye movements involved in reading. Therefore, both positive and negative contrasts can be recommended when presenting text to users on-screen and provide good readability. This goes for either eInk or LED screens, however, a tendency for longer fixations was observed when reading with negative contrast on the LED screen. This may be due to the higher contrast on the LED screen, compared to the lower contrast of the eInk screen.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Siegenthaler, E., Wurtz, P., Bergamin, P., Groner, R.: Comparing reading processes on e-ink displays and print. Displays 32(5), 268–273 (2011)
Scharff, L.F.V., Ahumada Jr., A.J.: Predicting the readability of transparent text. Journal of Vision 2(9), 653–666 (2002)
Scharff, L.F.V., Ahumada Jr., A.J.: Contrast measures for predicting text readability. In: Rogowitz, B.E., Pappas, T.N. (eds.) Human Vision and Electronic Imaging VII. SPIE Proc., vol. 5007, Paper 46 (2003)
Zuffi, S., Brambilla, C., Beretta, G., Scala, P.: Human Computer Interaction: Legibility and contrast. In: 14th International Conference on Image Analysis and Processing, ICIAP (2007)
Bauer, D., Cavonius, C.R.: Improving the legibility of video display unitsthrough contrast reversal. In: Grandjean, E., Vigliani, E. (eds.) Ergonomic Aspects of Video Display Terminals, pp. 137–142. Taylor & Francis, London (1980)
Buchner, A., Mayr, S., Brandt, M.: The advantage of positive text-background Polarity is due to high display luminance. Ergonomics 52(7), 882–886 (2009)
Legge, G.E., Rubin, G.S., Luebker, A.: Psychophysics of reading: V. The role of contrast in normal vision. Vision Res. 27(7), 1165–1177 (1987)
Hall, R.H., Hanna, P.: The impact of web page text-background colour combinations on readability, retention, aesthetics and behavioural intention. Behaviour & Information Technology 23(3), 183–195 (2004)
Rubin, G.S., Legge, G.E.: Psychophysics of reading: V. The role of contrast in low vision. Vision Res. 29(1), 79–91 (1989)
Siegenthaler, E., Bochud, Y., Bergamin, P., Wurtz, P.: Reading on LCD vs. e-Ink displays: effects on fatigue and visual strain. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics 32(5), 367–374 (2012)
Mansfield, J.S., Legge, G.E., Bane, M.C.: Psychophysics of reading: XV. Font effects in normal and low vision. Invest. Opthalmol. Vis. Sci. 37, 1492–1501 (1996)
Van de Velde, C., Grünau, M.: Tracking eye movements while reading: Printing press versus the cathode ray tube. Abstract Supplement (2003)
Poole, A., Ball, L.J.: Eye Tracking in Human-Computer Research: Current status and future prospects. In: Ghaoui, C. (ed.) Encyclopedia of Human Computer Interaction, pp. 211–219. Idea Group Reference (2006)
Morrison, R.E., Inhoff, A.W.: Visual factors and eye movement in reading. Visible Language 15(2), 129–146 (1981)
Holzinger, A., Baernthaler, M., Pammer, W., Katz, H., Bjelic-Radisic, V., Ziefle, M.: Investigating paper vs. screen in real-life hospital workflows: Performance contradicts perceived superiority of paper in the user experience. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 69(9), 563–570 (2011)
Hayhoe, M.M., Ballard, D.H.: Mechanisms of gaze control in natural vision. In: Liversedge, S.P., Gilchrist, I.D., Everling, S. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of EyeMovements, Oxford University Press, Oxford (2011)
Beste, C., Wascher, E., Güntürkün, O., Dinse, H.R.: Improvement and impairment of visually guided behavior through LTP- and LTD-like exposure-based visual learning. Curr. Biol. 21, 876–882 (2011)
Goldstein, E.B.: Sensation and Perception, 6th edn. Wadsworth, Belmont (2002)
Faria, A.W.C., Menotti, D., Pappa, G.L., Lara, D.S.D., Araujo, A.: A methodology for photometric validation in vehicles visual interactive systems. Expert Systems with Applications: An International Journal 39(4), 4122–4134 (2012)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Bochud, Y.E., Garbely, M. (2013). Reading on eInk and Backlit LED – The Influence of Positive and Negative Contrast on Eye Movements. In: Holzinger, A., Ziefle, M., Hitz, M., Debevc, M. (eds) Human Factors in Computing and Informatics. SouthCHI 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7946. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39062-3_51
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39062-3_51
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-39061-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-39062-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)