Towards an Acceptance Model for AAL

  • Gerhard Leitner
  • Oana Mitrea
  • Anton J. Fercher
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7946)


As one of the major goals in the ambient assisted living project Casa Vecchia (performed in 20 real world household installations) we want to thoroughly evaluate the life circumstances of elderly people in order to be able to establish a basic ontology including all relevant factors that are actually or potentially influencing the acceptance of AAL technology. A prototype system enabling the participants to observe automated features of an AAL system as well as to perform basic interaction and communication tasks was installed. Periodic evaluation cycles that were accompanying the project which were based on a customized mix of methods and concepts frequently discussed and applied in the context of AAL research. The main concepts used are the technology acceptance model (TAM), contextual design and the analysis of social networks. The project is still up and running, but first results could already be achieved which show a different access to technology between men and women.


Ambient Assisted Living Technology Acceptance Gender Differences 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Rode, J.A., Toye, E.F., Blackwell, A.F.: The fuzzy felt ethnography? Understanding the programming patterns of domestic appliances. Personal Ubiq. Computi. 8(3-4), 161–176 (2004)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Iachello, G., Truong, K.N., Abowd, G.D., Hayes, G.R., Stevens, M.: Experience prototyping and sampling to evaluate ubicomp privacy in the real world. In: Proceedings of CHI 2006, pp. 1009–1018 (2006)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Armitage, C.J., Conner, M.: Efficacy of the theory of planned behavior: a meta-analytic reivew. Br. J. Soc. Psychol. 40, 471–499 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Davis, F.D.: Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly 13, 319–340 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Venkatesh, V., Bala, H.: Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decision Sciences 39(2), 273–315 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Beyer, H., Holtzblatt, K.: Contextual Design. Interactions 6(1), 32–42 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Scott, J.: Social Network Analysis: A Handbook, 2nd edn. Sage, London (2000)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    BMBF/VDE Innovationspartnerschaft AAL: Interoperabilität von AAL- Systemkomponenten. Teil 1: Stand der Technik. VDE Verlag, Berlin (2010)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hassenzahl, M., Tractinsky, N.: User Experience - a research agenda. Behavior & Information Technology 25(2), 91–97 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wandke, H., Sengpiel, M., Sönksen, M.: Myths about older people’s use of information and communication technology. Gerontology 58(6), 564–570 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Degele, N.: Einführung in die Techniksoziologie. Fink/UTB, München (2002)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Oudshoorn, N., Rommes, E., Stienstra, M.: Configuring the user as everybody: Gender and design cultures in information and communication technologies. Science, Technology & Human Values 29(1), 30–63 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Nap, H.H., Kort, Y.D., IJsselsteijn, W.A.: Senior gamers: preferences, motivations and needs. Gerontechnology 8(4), 247–262 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gerhard Leitner
    • 1
  • Oana Mitrea
    • 2
  • Anton J. Fercher
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Informatics-SystemsAlpen-Adria Universität KlagenfurtKlagenfurtAustria
  2. 2.Institute for Smart System TechnologiesAlpen-Adria Universität KlagenfurtKlagenfurtAustria

Personalised recommendations