Advertisement

Older People as Equal Partners in Creative Design

  • Helena Sustar
  • Sara Jones
  • Andy Dearden
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7946)

Abstract

Active older people want to be actively engaged by contributing their experiences to design better services and products. This paper demonstrates the importance of older peoples engagement in the creative design process in a small study where older people were engaged together with designers in the design of digital devices. Three creative workshops were conducted: the first with designers, the second with designers and older people, and the third with older people only. During the illumination stage of the creative process flexibility and flow were measured with topics and turns. Results show that when older people were working with designers more topics and a higher total number of turns were developed than by older people or designers working on their own, which indicates that they had the highest flexibility of ideas and possibly also the greatest flow.

Keywords

Older People Creative process Creativity Flexibility Flow 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bjerre, A., Mogensen, K.Æ., Rasmussen, B.N., Dons, J.L., Schüle, H., Kruse, M.: Young Seniors Will Shape Society, http://www.cifs.dk/scripts/artikel.asp?id=1767&lng=2 (last accessed December 12, 2008)
  2. 2.
    Sanders, E.B.N.: Information, Inspiration and Co-creation. In: Conference of the European Academy of Design, University of the Arts, Bremen, p. 5 (2005)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dearden, A., Wright, P., Bowen, S., Cobb, M., Wolstenholme, D.: User Centred Design and Pervasive Health Position paper for workshop on User Centred Design of Pervasive Healthcare Applications. In: Pervasive Health Conference 2010, Munich (2010)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gregor, P., Newell, F.A., Zajicek, M.: Designing for Dynamic Diversity Interfaces for Older People. In: ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Assistive Technologies, Edinburgh, p. 781. ACM Press, New York (2002)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Healy, F.: Towards a Usability Research Methodology for Use with the Older Population. Amberlight Partners Ltd., London (2003)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sanders, N.E.B.: Collective Creativity. LOOP: AIGA Jnl. Int. Design Education 3, 1–6 (2001), http://www.maketools.com/pdfs/CollectiveCreativity_Sanders_ Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Engdahl, K., Leclerc, K., Loring, B.: Conducting Field Studies with Older Adults. User Experience 8(1), 14–16 (2009)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cropley, A.J.: Definitions of Creativity. In: Runco, A.M., Pritzker, R.S. (eds.) Encyclopedia of Creativity, p. 11, 115. Academic Press, California (1999)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Richards, R.: Everyday Creativity. In: Runco, A., Mark, P.R.S. (eds.) Encyclopedia of Creativity, pp. 683–687. Academic press, San Diego (1999)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Milgram, R.M.: Creativity: An Idea Whose Time Has Come and Gone? In: Runco, A.M., Albert, R.S. (eds.) Theories of Creativity, pp. 215–233. SAGE Publishing, Newbury Park (1990)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cropley, A.J.: Creativity in Education and Learning: A Guide for Teachers and Educators, p. 27. Kogan Page Limited (2003)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gaver, B., Dunne, T., Pacenti, E.: Design: Cultural Probes. Interactions 6(1), 21–29 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hawthorn, D.: Interface Design and Engagement with Older People. Behaviour and Information Technology 26(4), 333–341 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Massimo, M., Baecker, R.: Participatory Design Process with Older Users. In: Proceedings Ubicomp Workshop (2006)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bate, S.P., Robert, G.: Experience-based design: From redesigning the system around the patient to co-designing services with the patient. Quality and Safety in Health Care 15, 307–310 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bowen, S., Dearden, A., Wolstenholme, D., Cobb, M., Wright, P.: Different Views: Including Others in Participatory Health Service Innovation. In: Proceedings of PINC 2011, Sønderborg (2011)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Vaajakallio, K., Mattelmäki, T.: Collaborative Design Exploration: Envisioning Future Practices with Make Tools. In: Designing Pleasurable Products and Interfaces, DPPI 2007, Helsinki, pp. 223–238. ACM Press, New York (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Guilford, J.P.: Traits of Creativity, in Vernon, P.E. (Ed.) Creativity. Harmondsworth, pp. 167-234. Penguin Education (1959)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Csikszentmihalyi, M.: Creativity: Flow and the Psychology of Discovery and Invention, pp. 110–113. Harper Perennial, New York (1996)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Runco, A.M.: Divergent Thinking. In: Runco, A.M., Pritzker, R.S. (eds.) Encyclopedia of Creativity, pp. 577–582. California Academic Press, San Diego (1999)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Torrance, E.P.: The Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking: Norms-Technical Manual. Personal Press, Princeton (1966); Warr, A., O’Neill, E.: The Effect of Operational Mechanisms on Creativity in Design. In: Interact 2005: Human Computer Interaction, pp. 629–642. Springer, Rome (2005)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Warr, A., O’Neill, E.: The Effect of Group Composition on Divergent Thinking in an Interaction Design Activity. In: Proceedings of the 6th Conference on Designing Interactive systems, University Park, pp. 122–131. ACM Press, New York (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kerne, A., Smith, S.M., Mistrot, J.M., Sundaram, V., Khandelwal, M., Wang, J.: Mapping Interest and Design to Facilitate Creative Process During Mixed-Initiative Information Composition. In: Creativity & Cognition, p. 14. Studios Press, Sydney (2004)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sustar, H.: Older People as Equal Partners in the Creative Design of Digital Devices. PhD thesis, City University London, vol. 1, pp. 231–232, vol. 2, 115 (2010)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Wallas, G.: The Art of Thought. Harcourt Brace, New York (1926)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sustar, H., Jones, D., Maiden, N.: Creativity in Older People Designing Digital Devices. In: Create 2010, London (2010)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kulesza, T., Weng-Keen, W., Stumpf, S., Perona, S., White, R., Burnett, M.M., Oberst, I., Ko, A.J.: Fixing the Program My Computer Learned: Barriers for End Users. In: Challenges for the Machine, IUI 2009, pp. 187–196. ACM, Sanibel Island (2009)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Suwa, M., Gero, J., Purcell, T.: Unexpected Discoveries and S-invention of design requirements: Important Vehicles for a Design Process. Design Studies 21, 539–567 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    WordNet: Version 2.1, http://www.cogsci.princeton.edu/wn/ (last accessed January 15, 2005)

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Helena Sustar
    • 1
  • Sara Jones
    • 2
  • Andy Dearden
    • 1
  1. 1.User Centred Healthcare DesignSheffield Hallam UniversitySheffieldGreat Britain
  2. 2.Centre for Human Computer Interaction DesignCity University LondonGreat Britain

Personalised recommendations