Advertisement

Course and Perception of Ageing in Different Cultures Relevant for Intercultural HCI Design

  • Rüdiger Heimgärtner
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7946)

Abstract

The course of perception for ageing in different cultures is elucidated to derive recommendations for intercultural human-computer interaction (HCI) design. How ageing influences the usage and the design of intercultural HCI is analyzed. Software development and usability engineering are perceived quite differently in various parts of the world according to the age of the respective interpreters. The main tasks are discussed which users request depending on their age. The discussion covers how age influences software developers and how UI designers collaborate with respect to different cultural backgrounds.

Keywords

Learning Challenges Cross-Cultural Culture Communication Interpretation HCI Intercultural Cultural Studies HCI Design Cultural Differences Understanding Empathy Intercultural Communication Intercultural HCI Design Age Ageing Perception 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Casper, C., Rothermund, K., Wentura, D.: The activation of specific facets of age stereotypes depends on individuating information. Social Cognition 29, 393–414 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Brandtstädter, J., Rothermund, K., Kranz, D., Kühn, W.: Final Decentrations. European Psychologist 15, 152–163 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rothermund, K., Brandstädter, J.: Coping with deficits and losses in later life: from compensatory action to accommodation. Psychology and Aging 18, 896 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dickinson, A., Arnott, J., Prior, S.: Methods for human-computer interaction research with older people. Behav. Inf. Technol. 26, 343–352 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Nunes, F., Silva, P.A., Abrantes, F.: Human-computer interaction and the older adult: an example using user research and personas. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments, pp. 1–8. ACM, Samos (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Johnson, C.A., Adams, A.J., Twelker, J.D., Quigg, J.M.: Age-related changes in the central visual field for short-wavelength-sensitive pathways. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 5, 2131–2139 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Newell, A.F., Arnott, J., Carmichael, A., Morgan, M.: Methodologies for Involving Older Adults in the Design Process. In: Stephanidis, C. (ed.) HCI 2007. LNCS, vol. 4554, pp. 982–989. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Röse, K., Zühlke, D.: Culture-Oriented Design: Developers’ Knowledge Gaps in this Area. In: 8th IFAC/IFIPS/IFORS/IEA Symposium on Analysis, Design, and Evaluation of Human-Machine Systems, September 18-20, pp. 11–16. Pergamon (2001)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kotter-Grühn, D., Hess, T.M.: The impact of age stereotypes on self-perceptions of aging across the adult lifespan. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences 67, 563–571 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Levy, B., Langer, E.: Aging free from negative stereotypes: Successful memory in China among the American deaf. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 66, 989 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rothermund, K., Brandtstädter, J.: Age stereotypes and self-views in later life: Evaluating rival assumptions. International Journal of Behavioral Development 27, 549–554 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kornadt, A.E., Rothermund, K.: Contexts of aging: assessing evaluative age stereotypes in different life domains. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences 66, 547–556 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Keith, J., Fry, C., Glascock, A., Ikels, C., Dickerson-Putman, J., Harpending, H.: The aging experience. Sage Pub. (1994)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Levine, R.V., Norenzayan, A.: The pace of life in 31 countries. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 30, 178–205 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Fung, H.H., Stoeber, F.S., Yeung, D.Y.-I., Lang, F.R.: Cultural specificity of socioemotional selectivity: Age differences in social network composition among Germans and Hong Kong Chinese. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences 63, 156–164 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cowling, B.J., Chan, K.-H., Fang, V.J., Cheng, C.K., Fung, R.O., Wai, W., Sin, J., Seto, W.H., Yung, R., Chu, D.W.: Facemasks and Hand Hygiene to Prevent Influenza Transmission in Households A Cluster Randomized Trial. Annals of Internal Medicine 151, 437–446 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Carstensen, L.L., Mikels, J.A., Mather, M.: Aging and the intersection of cognition, motivation, and emotion. Handbook of the Psychology of Aging 6, 343–362 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Westerhof, G.J., Whitbourne, S.K., Freeman, G.P.: The aging self in a cultural context: the relation of conceptions of aging to identity processes and self-esteem in the United States and the Netherlands. J. Gerontol. B. Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci. 67, 52–60 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Westerhof, G.J., Whitbourne, S.K., Freeman, G.P.: The Aging Self in a Cultural Context: The Relation of Conceptions of Aging to Identity Processes and Self-Esteem in the United States and the Netherlands. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences (2011)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Cross, S.E., Hardin, E.E., Gercek-Swing, B.: The what, how, why, and where of self-construal. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 15, 142–179 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Werner, B., Rothermund, K.: Attention please: No affective priming effects in a valent/neutral-categorisation task. Cognition & Emotion 1-14 (2012)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Humboldt, S.V., Leal, I., Pimenta, F.: Adjustment and Age Through the Eyes of Portuguese and English Community-Dwelling Older Adults. Studies in Sociology of Science 3, 1–9 (2012)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Brandtstädter, J., Rothermund, K.: The life-course dynamics of goal pursuit and goal adjustment: A two-process framework. Developmental Review 22, 117–150 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Rothermund, K., Bak, P.M., Brandtstädter, J.: Biases in self‐evaluation: moderating effects of attribute controllability. European Journal of Social Psychology 35, 281–290 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Heimgärtner, R.: Cultural Differences in Human-Computer Interaction. Oldenbourg Verlag (2012)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Stueber, K.R.: Rediscovering empathy: agency, folk psychology, and the human sciences. MIT Press, Cambridge (2010)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Dennett, D.C.: The intentional stance. MIT Press, Cambridge (1998)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Austin, J.L., Savigny, E.V.: Zur Theorie der Sprechakte = (How to do things with words). Reclam, Stuttgart (2010)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Grice, P.: Studies in the way of words. Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge (1993)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Thomas, A., Kinast, E.-U., Schroll-Machl, S.: Handbook of intercultural communication and cooperation. Basics and areas of application. Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, Göttingen (2010)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Whorf, B.L.: Sprache - Denken - Wirklichkeit Beiträge zur Metalinguistik und Sprachphilosophie. Rowohlt, Reinbek bei Hamburg (2008)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Winograd, T., Flores, F.: Understanding computers and cognition: A new foundation for design. Addison-Wesley, Boston (2004)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Herczeg, M.: Software-Ergonomie: Grundlagen der Mensch-Computer-Kommunikation. Oldenbourg, München (2005)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Van Kleek, M., Shrobe, H.E.: A practical activity capture framework for personal, lifetime user modeling. In: Conati, C., McCoy, K., Paliouras, G. (eds.) UM 2007. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4511, pp. 298–302. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Quine, W.V.O.: Word and object. MIT Press, Cambridge (2004)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rüdiger Heimgärtner
    • 1
  1. 1.Intercultural User Interface Consulting (IUIC)UndorfGermany

Personalised recommendations