Advertisement

Towards Unification for Pointing Task Evaluation in 3D Desktop Virtual Environment

  • Mathieu Raynal
  • Emmanuel Dubois
  • Bénédicte Schmitt
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7946)

Abstract

New visualization systems for large and complex datasets are emerging and 3D Virtual Environments turn out to be a relevant solution. Interaction tasks in these 3D VE have been defined, especially to support evaluation of these applications. Nevertheless there is a lack of unified protocol to assess these elementary tasks in this context. Moreover it can be complex to determine the appropriate technique to perform these tasks as there is a lack of reference data. A standard is available for 2D pointing task, but there is no equivalence in 3D. In this paper, we propose an adaptation of this standard to a pointing task in a 3D VE. We detail our protocol and an instrumentation, which aims at assessing performance, comfort of techniques and satisfaction of users. We also present results of a user experimentation conducted according to this standard’s adaptation.

Keywords

Pointing task 3D virtual environment 3D interaction usability study 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bach, C., Scapin, D.: Ergonomic criteria adapted to human virtual environment interaction. In: 15th French-Speaking Conference on HCI, pp. 24–31. ACM, New York (2003)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gallo, L., de Pietro, G., Marra, I.: 3D interaction with volumetric medical data: experiencing the Wiimote. In: 1st International Conference on Ambient Media and Systems (Ambi-Sys 2008) (2008)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Balakrishnan, R., Baudel, T., Kurtenbach, G., Fitzmaurice, G.: The Rockin’Mouse: integral 3D manipulation on a plane. In: SIGCHI Conference on Human factors in computing systems (CHI 1997), pp. 311–318. ACM, New York (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Froehlich, B., Plate, J.: The cubic mouse: a new device for three-dimensional input. In: Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2000), pp. 526–531. ACM, New York (2000)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bowman, D.A., Kruijff, E., LaViola, J.J., Poupyrev, I.: 3D User Interfaces: Theory and Practice. Addison Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Masliah, M.: Measuring the allocation of control in 6 degree of freedom human-computer interaction tasks, PhD thesis, University of Toronto (2001)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    MacKenzie, I.S., Buxton, W.: Extending Fitts’ law to two-dimensional tasks. In: Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 1992), pp. 219–226. ACM, New York (1992)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ware, C., Lowther, K.: Selection using a one-eyed cursor in a fish tank VR environment. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 4(4), 309–322 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Grossman, T., Balakrishnan, R.: Pointing at trivariate targets in 3D environments. In: Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2004), pp. 447–454. ACM, NY (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    ISO, 9421-9 Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs)-Part 9: Requirements for non-keyboard input devices. ISO (2000) Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Natapov, D., Castellucci, S.J., MacKenzie, I.S.: ISO 9241-9 evaluation of video game controllers. In: Graphics Interface 2009 (GI 2009), pp. 223–230 (2009)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Teather, R.J., Stuerzlinger, W.: Target Pointing in 3D User Interfaces. In: Poster at Graphics Interface (GI 2010) (2010)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Teather, R.J., Stuerzlinger, W.: Pointing at 3D targets in a stereo head-tracked virtual environment. In: IEEE Symposium on 3D User Interfaces (3DUI 2011), pp. 87–94 (2011)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hubona, G.S., Wheeler, P.N., Shirah, G.W., Brandt, M.: The relative contributions of stereo, lighting, and background scenes in promoting 3D depth visualization. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 6(3), 214–242 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ortega, M., Nigay, L.: AirMouse: Finger Gesture for 2D and 3D Interaction. In: Gross, T., Gulliksen, J., Kotzé, P., Oestreicher, L., Palanque, P., Prates, R.O., Winckler, M. (eds.) INTERACT 2009. LNCS, vol. 5727, pp. 214–227. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bérard, F., Ip, J., Benovoy, M., El-Shimy, D., Blum, J.R., Cooperstock, J.R.: Did “Minority Report” Get it Wrong? Superiority of the Mouse over 3D Input in a 3D Placement Task. In: Gross, T., Gulliksen, J., Kotzé, P., Oestreicher, L., Palanque, P., Prates, R.O., Winckler, M. (eds.) INTERACT 2009. LNCS, vol. 5727, pp. 400–414. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zhai, S.: lnvestigation of feel for 6 DOF inputs: isometric and elastic rate control for manipulation in 3D environments. In: Proc. of The Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 37th Annual Meeting, vol. 37(4), pp. 323–327 (1993)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Schmitt, B., Raynal, M., Dubois, E., Bach, C.: Extension de la norme ISO 9241-9 au pointage en 3D. In: 23rd French Speaking Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (IHM 2011), pp. 117–120. ACM, New York (2011)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
  20. 20.
    Zhai, S., Milgram, P.: Quantifying coordination in multiple DOF movement and its application to evaluating 6 DOF input devices. In: Karat, C.-M., Lund, A., Coutaz, J., Karat, J. (eds.) Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 1998), pp. 320–327. ACM Press/Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., New York (1998)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Zhai, S., Buxton, W., Milgram, P.: The “Silk Cursor”: Investigating transparency for 3D target acquisition. In: Adelson, B., Dumais, S., Olson, J. (eds.) Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 1994), pp. 459–464. ACM, New York (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Schmitt, B., Dubois, E., Raynal, M., Bach, C., Croenne, D.: Evaluation d’une technique d’interaction ubiquitaire pour le pointage de données complexes et spatialisées. In: Journées Francophones Mobilité et Ubiquité (UBIMOB 2011), pp. 1–8 (2011)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Schmitt, B., Raynal, M., Dubois, E.: A composite approach to evaluate two interaction techniques for a 3D pointing task. In: IEEE Symposium on 3D User Interfaces, pp. 159–160 (2012)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Bangor, A., Kortum, P.-T., Miller, J.-T.: An empirical evaluation of the System Usability Scale. Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 574–594 (2008)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Zhai, S.: User performance in relation to 3D input device design. SIGGRAPH Comput. Graph. 32(4), 50–54 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mathieu Raynal
    • 1
  • Emmanuel Dubois
    • 1
  • Bénédicte Schmitt
    • 1
  1. 1.IRIT – ELIPSEUniversité Paul SabatierToulouse cedex 9France

Personalised recommendations