Advertisement

Route Descriptions in Advance and Turn-by-Turn Instructions - Usability Evaluation of a Navigational System for Visually Impaired and Blind People in Public Transport

  • Elke Mattheiss
  • Elmar Krajnc
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7946)

Abstract

Wayfinding in public transport is still a great challenge for visually impaired and blind people. The presented evaluation study was conducted in the context of the research project Ways4All, which aims to develop an accessible system to facilitate the use of public transport for visually impaired and blind people. The study aims to assess the indoor and outdoor navigation modules of the mobile application developed in Ways4All. In a field study with 16 participants usability and accessibility issues of the system were identified. Furthermore it was investigated whether visually impaired and blind people wish to have a route description in advance, besides the turn-by-turn instructions provided by the system. The data analysis shows that the majority of visually impaired and blind people like to have the possibility to process a route description before they actually navigate. On the basis of the user feedback and the occurring issues, recommendations for the system design were created.

Keywords

Usability evaluation accessibility visually impaired public transport outdoor navigation indoor navigation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Golledge, R.G.: Human wayfinding and cognitive maps. In: Golledge, R.G. (ed.) Wayfinding Behavior: Cognitive Mapping and other Spatial Processes, pp. 1–45. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore (1999)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Devlin, A.S.: Environmental perception: Wayfinding and spatial cognition. In: Clayton, S.D. (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Environmental and Conservation Psychology, 41–64. Oxford University Press, New York (2012)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Espinosa, M.A., Ungar, S., Ochaita, E., Blades, M., Spencer, C.: Comparing methods for introducing blind and visually impaired people to unfamiliar urban environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology 18, 277–287 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Passini, R., Proulx, G.: Wayfinding without vision: An experiment with congenitally totally blind people. Environment and Behavior 20(2), 227–252 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Preiser, W.: A combined tactile-electronic guidance system for visually impaired person in indoor and outdoor spaces. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Building Use and Safety Technology, pp. 49–53 (1985)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Quinones, P.-A., Greene, T., Yang, R., Newman, M.: Supporting visually impaired navigation: a needs-finding study. In: Proceedings of the 2011 Annual Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems’, CHI EA 2011, pp. 1645–1650. ACM, New York (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Loomis, J.M., Marston, J.R., Golledge, R.G., Klatzky, R.L.: Personal guidance system for people with visual impairment: A comparison of spatial displays for route guidance. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness 99(4), 219–232 (2005)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Stent, A.J., Azenkot, S., Stern, B.: Iwalk: A lightweight navigation system for low-vision users. In: Proceedings of the 12th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility, ASSETS 2010, pp. 269–270. ACM, New York (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Angin, P., Bhargava, B.K.: Real-time mobile-cloud computing for context-aware blind navigation. International Journal of Next-Generation Computing 2(2) (2011)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Guy, R., Truong, K.: CrossingGuard: Exploring information content in navigation aids for visually impaired pedestrians. In: Proceedings of the 2012 ACM Annual Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2012, pp. 405–414. ACM, New York (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Willis, S., Helal, S.: RFID information grid for blind navigation and wayfinding. In: Proceedings of the 9th IEEE International Symposium on Wearable Computers (ISWC), pp. 34–37. IEEE (2005)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bellotti, F., Berta, R., Gloria, A.D., Margarone, M.: Guiding visually impaired people in the exhibition. In: Mobile Guide, Turin, Italy (2006), http://mobileguide06.di.unito.it/pdf/Bellotti&al.pdf
  13. 13.
    Ivanov, R.: Indoor navigation system for visually impaired. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Computer Systems and Technologies and Workshop for PhD Students in Computing on International Conference on Computer Systems and Technologies, CompSysTech 2010, pp. 143–149. ACM, New York (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Peischl, B., Ziefle, M., Holzinger, A.: A mobile information system for improved navigation in public transport: User centered design, development, evaluation and e-Business scenarios of a mobile roadmap application. In: International Conference on Data Communication Networking, e-Business and Optical Communication Systems, pp. 217–221. SciTec Press, Rome (2012)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Padzi, F., Ibrahim, F.: Accessibility of visually impaired passengers at urban railway stations in the klang valley. International Transaction Journal of Engineering, Management, & Applied Sciences & Technologies 3(3), 277–292 (2012)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Guentert, M.: Improving public transit accessibility for blind riders: a train station navigation assistant. In: The Proceedings of the 13th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility, ASSETS 2011, pp. 317–318. ACM, New York (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Krajnc, E., Feiner, J., Schmidt, S.: User centered interaction design for mobile applications focused on visually impaired and blind people. In: Leitner, G., Hitz, M., Holzinger, A. (eds.) USAB 2010. LNCS, vol. 6389, pp. 195–202. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Krajnc, E., Knoll, M., Feiner, J., Traar, M.: A touch sensitive user interface approach on smartphones for visually impaired and blind persons. In: Holzinger, A., Simonic, K.-M. (eds.) USAB 2011. LNCS, vol. 7058, pp. 585–594. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Brooke, J.: SUS: A “quick and dirty” usability scale. In: Jordan, P.W., Thomas, B., Weerdmeester, B.A., McClelland, I.L. (eds.) Usability Evaluation in Industry, pp. 189–194. Taylor & Francis, London (1996)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hart, S.G.: Nasa-task load index (NASA-TLX); 20 years later. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, vol. 50(9), pp. 904–908 (2006)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Elke Mattheiss
    • 1
  • Elmar Krajnc
    • 1
  1. 1.FH Joanneum, University of Applied SciencesKapfenbergAustria

Personalised recommendations