Skip to main content

Benefits and Drawbacks of Reference Architectures

  • Conference paper
Software Architecture (ECSA 2013)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 7957))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Reference architectures (RA) have been studied to create a consistent notion of what constitutes them as well as their benefits and drawbacks. However, few empirical studies have been conducted to provide evidence that support the claims made. To increase this evidence, this paper investigates the actual industrial practice of using RAs. The study consists of a survey with 28 stakeholders from everis, a multinational consulting company based in Spain. We report the findings and contextualize them with previous research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Angelov, S., Grefen, P., Greefhorst, D.: A framework for analysis and design of software reference architectures. Information and Software Technology 54(4), 417–431 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Cloutier, R., Muller, G., Verma, D., Nilchiani, R., Hole, E., Bone, M.: The concept of reference architectures. Systems Engineering 13(1), 14–27 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dobrica, L., Ovaska, E.: Analysis of a Cross-Domain Reference Architecture using Change Scenarios. SAVA@ECSA (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gallagher, B.: Using the architecture tradeoff analysis method sm to evaluate a reference architecture: A case study. SEI CMU Tech. rep., DTIC Document (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Galster, M., Avgeriou, P.: Empirically-grounded reference architectures: A proposal. In: QoSA-ISARCS, pp. 153–158 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Martínez-Fernández, S., Ayala, C., Franch, X., Martins, H.: REARM: A Reused-Based Economic Model for Software Reference Architectures. In: ICSR (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Muller, G., Laar, P.: Researching reference architectures. In: CSER (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Nakagawa, E.Y., Antonino, P.O., Becker, M.: Reference architecture and product line architecture: A subtle but critical difference. In: Crnkovic, I., Gruhn, V., Book, M. (eds.) ECSA 2011. LNCS, vol. 6903, pp. 207–211. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Martínez-Fernández, S., Ayala, C.P., Franch, X., Martins Marques, H. (2013). Benefits and Drawbacks of Reference Architectures. In: Drira, K. (eds) Software Architecture. ECSA 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7957. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39031-9_26

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39031-9_26

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-39030-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-39031-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics