Abstract
The Platonic quest for universal principles dominates the mainstream of IS research, typically relegating individual differences to the error term as pet theories and derived hypotheses are put to the statistical test. In design science, this neglect of “particulars” is especially egregious as it wastes valuable information about individuals and their interactions with technology. I present a case study of the design of adaptive automation, which shows how critical such information can be when designing complex IT-based systems. The obsession with theory has gone too far, I conclude; it is time to fight back against the tyranny of universals.
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
References
Feyerabend, P.: The conquest of abundance. University of Chicago Press (1999)
Chavaillaz, A., Sauer, J., Wastell, D.: System reliability, performance and trust in adaptable automation, Submitted for publication to Applied Ergonomics (2012)
Dörner, D.: On the difficulties people have in dealing with complexity. In: Rasmussen, J., et al. (eds.) New Technology and Human Error. Wiley, New York (1987)
Hebb, D.O.: Textbook of Psychology, 3rd edn. Saunders, Saunders (1972)
Hevner, A.R., March, S.T., Park, J., Ram, S.: Design science in information systems research. MIS Quarterly 28(1), 75–105 (2004)
Hockey, R.: Compensatory Control in The Regulation of Human Performance under Stress and High Workload: A Cognitive-Energetical Framework. Biological Psychology 45, 73–93 (1997)
Inagaki, T.: Adaptive Automation: Sharing and trading of control. In: Holl-nagel, E. (ed.) Handbook of Cognitive Task Design, pp. 147–169. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, London (2003)
Kaber, D.B., Endsley, M.R.: The effects of level of automation and adaptive automation on human performance, situation awareness and workload in a dy-namic control task. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science 5, 113–153 (2004)
Kaber, D.B., Riley, J.M.: Adaptive automation of a dynamic control task based on secondary task workload measurement. International Journal of Cognitive Ergonomics 3, 169–187 (1999)
Parasuraman, R., Wickens, C.D.: Humans: Still vital after all these years of automation. Human Factors 50(3), 511–520 (2008)
Sauer, J., Nickel, P., Wastell, D.: Designing automation for complex work environments under different levels of stress. Applied Ergonomics (2012) (in press)
Sauer, J., Kao, C., Wastell, D.: A comparison of adaptive &adaptable automation under different levels of environmental stress. Ergonomics 55, 1–14 (2012)
Sauer, J., Kao, C.-S., Wastell, D., Nickel, P.: Explicit control of adaptive automation under different levels of environmental stress. Ergonomics 54, 755–766 (2012)
Tattersall, A.J., Hockey, G.R.J.: Demanding work, technology, and human performance. In: Chmiel, N. (ed.) Introduction to Work and Organizational Psychology: A European Perspective, pp. 169–189. Blackwell, Malden Mass (2008)
Sewell, E.: The Orphic Voice: Poetry and Natural History. Routledge and Kegan Paul (1960)
Sheridan, T.B., Verplank, W.L.: Human and computer control of undersea teleoperators. Office of Naval Research, Arlington (1978)
Stamper, R.: Management epistemology: garbage in, garbage out. In: Methlie, L.B., Sprague, R.H. (eds.) Knowledge Representation for Decision Support Systems, pp. 55–77. Springer, Heidelberg (1985)
van Aken, J.E.: Management research as a design science: articulating the research products of mode 2 knowledge production in management. British Journal of Management 16, 19–36 (2005)
Wastell, D.G.: Human-machine dynamics in complex information systems:the “microworld” paradigm as a heuristic tool for developing theory and exploring design issues. Information Systems Journal 6, 245–260 (1997)
Wastell, D.G., Sauer, J., Schmeink, C.: Homeward bound: ecological de-sign of domestic information systems. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology 287, 273–290 (2008)
Wickens, C.D., Hollands, J.G.: Attention, Time-Sharing, and Workload. In: Roberts, N. (ed.) Engineering Psychology and Human Performance, pp. 439–479. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River (2000)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing
About this paper
Cite this paper
Wastell, D. (2013). In Praise of Abundance: Why Individuals Matter in Design Science. In: Dwivedi, Y.K., Henriksen, H.Z., Wastell, D., De’, R. (eds) Grand Successes and Failures in IT. Public and Private Sectors. TDIT 2013. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, vol 402. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38862-0_36
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38862-0_36
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-38861-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-38862-0
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)