Skip to main content

Adapting Recommendation Diversity to Openness to Experience: A Study of Human Behaviour

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 7899))

Abstract

This paper uses a User-as-Wizard approach to evaluate how people apply diversity to a set of recommendations. In particular, it considers how diversity is applied for a recipient with high or low Openness to Experience, a personality trait from the Five Factor Model. While there was no effect of the personality trait on the degree of diversity applied, there seems to be a trend in the way in which it was applied. Maximal categorical diversity (across genres) was more likely to be applied to those with high Openness to Experience, at the expense of maximal thematic diversity (within genres).

This research has been funded by the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC, UK), grant ref. EP/J012084/1.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abbassi, Z., Mirrokni, V.S., Thakur, M.: Diversity maximization under matroid constraints. Technical report, Department of Computer Science, Columbia University (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bridge, D., Kelly, J.P.: Ways of computing diverse collaborative recommendations. In: Wade, V.P., Ashman, H., Smyth, B. (eds.) AH 2006. LNCS, vol. 4018, pp. 41–50. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Smyth, B., McClave, P.: Similarity vs. Diversity. In: Aha, D.W., Watson, I. (eds.) ICCBR 2001. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2080, pp. 347–361. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Ziegler, C.N., McNee, S.M., Konstan, J.A., Lausen, G.: Improving recommendation lists through topic diversification. In: WWW 2005, pp. 22–32 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Workshop on Novelty and Diversity in Recommender Systems, DiveRS 2011 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Goldberg, L.: The structure of phenotypic personality traits. American Psychologist 48, 26–34 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Nunes, M.A.S.N.: Recommender Systems based on Personality Traits. PhD thesis, Universite Montpellier 2 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Costa, P.T., McCrae, R.R.: NEO personality Inventory professional manual. Psychological Assessment Resources, Odessa (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Herlocker, J.L., Konstan, J.A., Terveen, L., Riedl, J.T.: Evaluating collaborative filtering recommender systems. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 22(1), 5–53 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Said, A., Fields, B., Jain, B.J., Albayrak, S.: User-centric evaluation of a k-furthest neighbor collaborative filtering recommender algorithm. In: CSCW (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  11. APA: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 4th edn. American Psychiatric Association (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Dunn, G., Wiersema, J., Ham, J., Aroyo, L.: Evaluating interface variants on personality acquisition for recommender systems. In: Houben, G.-J., McCalla, G., Pianesi, F., Zancanaro, M. (eds.) UMAP 2009. LNCS, vol. 5535, pp. 259–270. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Lin, C.H., Mcleod, D.: Exploiting and learning human temperaments for customized information recommendation. In: IMSA (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hu, R., Pu, P.: Enhancing collaborative filtering systems with personality information. In: Recsys (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hu, R., Pu, P.: Acceptance issues of personality-based recommender systems. In: Recsys (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Pu, P., Chen, L., Hu, R.: Evaluating recommender systems from the users perspective: survey of the state of the art. UMUAI 22, 317–355 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Adomavicius, G., Kwon, Y.: Improving aggregate recommendation diversity using ranking-based techniques. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 24, 896–911 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Golbeck, J., Hansen, D.L.: A framework for recommending collections. In: Workshop on Novelty and Diversity in Recommender Systems in Conjuction with Recsys (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Pu, P., Chen, L., Hu, R.: A user-centric evaluation framework for recommender systems. In: Recsys (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Adamopoulos, P., Tuzhilin, A.: On unexpectedness in recommender systems: Or how to except the unexpected. In: Workshop on Novelty and Diversity in Recommender Systems in Conjuction with Recsys (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  21. MT: Amazon mechanical turk, http://www.mturk.com

  22. Sinha, R., Swearingen, K.: Comparing recommendations made by online systems and friends. In: Proceedings of the DELOS-NSF Workshop on Personalization and Recommender Systems in Digital Libraries (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Masthoff, J.: The user as wizard: A method for early involvement in the design and evaluation of adaptive systems. In: Fifth Workshop on User-Centred Design and Evaluation of Adaptive Systems, vol. 1, pp. 460–469 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Paramythis, A., Weibelzahl, S., Masthoff, J.: Layered evaluation of interactive adaptive systems: framework and formative methods. UMUAI 20, 383–453 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Taylor, W.L.: Cloze procedure: A new tool for measuring readability. Journalism Quarterly 30, 415–433 (1953)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Gosling, S.D., Rentfrow, P.J., Swann Jr., W.B.: A very brief measure of the big five personality domains. Journal of Research in Personality 37, 504–528 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Goz-lab: Tipi normal values, http://tiny.cc/9otwqw

  28. Dennis, M., Masthoff, J., Mellish, C.: The quest for validated personality trait stories. In: IUI (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Goldberg, L.R., Johnson, J.A., Eber, H.W., Hogan, R., Ashton, M.C., Cloninger, C.R., Gough, H.G.: The international personality item pool and the future of public-domain personality measures. Journal of Research in Personality 40(1), 84–96 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Tintarev, N., Masthoff, J.: Over- and underestimation in different product domains. In: Workshop on Recommender Systems in Conjunction with the European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 14–19 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Tintarev, N., Masthoff, J.: Designing and evaluating explanations for recommender systems. In: Kantor, P.B., Ricci, F., Rokach, L., Shapira, B. (eds.) Recommender Systems Handbook, Springer (2010)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Tintarev, N., Dennis, M., Masthoff, J. (2013). Adapting Recommendation Diversity to Openness to Experience: A Study of Human Behaviour. In: Carberry, S., Weibelzahl, S., Micarelli, A., Semeraro, G. (eds) User Modeling, Adaptation, and Personalization. UMAP 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7899. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38844-6_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38844-6_16

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-38843-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-38844-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics