Skip to main content

An Improvement of Process Reference Model Design and Validation Using Business Process Management

  • Conference paper
Software Process Improvement and Capability Determination (SPICE 2013)

Abstract

During the design of a Process Reference Model (PRM), the modeler needs to describe processes. According to ISO/IEC 15504-2, each process shall be described in terms of a process purpose and process outcomes. The process purpose is “the high level measurable objectives of performing the process and the likely outcomes of effective implementation of the process”. A process outcome is “an observable result of a process”. The set of process outcomes shall be necessary and sufficient to achieve the purpose of the process. However, no method exists as ISO proposes requirements and guidelines (respectively in ISO/IEC 15504-2 and ISO/IEC 24774 for process description) for developing process models. So there is a need to support the development of a process model and the verification of the completeness of the process outcomes in the context of process design. This article proposes a structured approach to answer this challenge based on business process management and requirements engineering principles. We especially consider the use of both the transformative view and coordination view of a process to support the design and the validation of PRM processes based on a collection of requirements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Keen, P.G.W., Inc NetLibrary: The Process Edge: Creating Value Where It Counts. Harvard Business School Press, Boston (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  2. http://www.automotivespice.com

  3. http://www.enterprisespice.com

  4. ISO/IEC 15504-2: Information technology – Process assessment – Part 2: Performing an assessment (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Malzahn, D.: A service extension for spice? In: SPICE Conference, Seoul, South Korea (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Barafort, B., Renault, A., Picard, M., Cortina, S.: A transformation process for building PRMs and PAMs based on a collection of requirements – example with ISO/IEC 20000. In: SPICE Conference, Nuremberg, Germany (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Di Renzo, B., Valoggia, P.: Assessment and improvement of firm’s knowledge management capabilities by using a KM process assessment compliant to ISO/IEC 15504. A case study. In: SPICE Conference, Seoul, South Korea (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ivanyos, J.: Implementing process assessment model of internal financial control. In: The International SPICE Days, Frankfurt/Main, Germany (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Coletta, A.: An industrial experience in assessing the capability of non-software processes using ISO/IEC 15504. Software Process: Improvement and Practice 12(4), 315–319 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Rifaut, A., Dubois, E.: Using goal-oriented requirements engineering for improving the quality of ISO/IEC 15504 based compliance assessment frameworks. In: 16th IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference, Barcelona, Spain, vol. 16, pp. 33–42. IEEE Computer Society (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Silva, J.V.L., Nabuco, O.F., Salviano, C.F., Reis, M.C., Maciel Filho, R.: Towards an ISO/IEC 15504-based process capability model for public university’s research laboratory. In: SPICE Conference, Seoul, South Korea, vol. 2007, pp. 12–21 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Morris, P.W.G.: Managing Project Interfaces—Key Points for Project Success. In: Project Management Handbook, pp. 16–55. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Medina-Mora, R., Winograd, T., Flores, R., Flores, F.: The action workflow approach to workflow management technology. In: Proceedings of the 1992 ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, pp. 281–288. ACM (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  14. van der Aalst, W.M.P., ter Hofstede, A.H.M., Weske, M.: Business Process Management: A Survey. In: van der Aalst, W.M.P., ter Hofstede, A.H.M., Weske, M. (eds.) BPM 2003. LNCS, vol. 2678, pp. 1–12. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Picard, M., Renault, A., Cortina, S.: How to Improve Process Models for Better ISO/IEC 15504 Process Assessment. In: Riel, A., O’Connor, R., Tichkiewitch, S., Messnarz, R. (eds.) EuroSPI 2010. CCIS, vol. 99, pp. 130–141. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Mangin, O., Barafort, B., Heymans, P., Dubois, E.: Designing a Process Reference Model for Information Security Management Systems. In: Mas, A., Mesquida, A., Rout, T., O’Connor, R.V., Dorling, A. (eds.) SPICE 2012. CCIS, vol. 290, pp. 129–140. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Barafort, B., Humbert, J.P., Poggi, S.: Information security management and ISO/IEC 15504: the link opportunity between security and quality. In: SPICE Conference, Luxembourg (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  18. ISO 9000:2005: Quality management systems – Fundamentals and vocabulary (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  19. ISO/IEC TR 24774:2010 systems and software engineering – life cycle management – guidelines for process description

    Google Scholar 

  20. Mc Caffery, F., Dorling, A.: Medi SPICE: An Overview. In: SPICE 2009 Conference (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Van Lamsweerde, A.: Goal-oriented requirements engineering: A guided tour. In: Fifth IEEE International Symposium on Requirements Engineering, Toronto, Canada, pp. 249–262. IEEE (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  22. ISO/IEC 27001: Information technology – security techniques – information security management systems – requirements (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  23. ISO/IEC 15504-1: Information technology – Process assessment – Part 1: Concepts and vocabulary (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  24. ISO/IEC TR 20000-4 Information technology – Service management – Part 4: Process reference model (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  25. ISO/IEC 20000-1: Information technology – Service management – Part 1: Service management system requirements (2011)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Mangin, O., Mayer, N., Barafort, B., Heymans, P., Dubois, E. (2013). An Improvement of Process Reference Model Design and Validation Using Business Process Management. In: Woronowicz, T., Rout, T., O’Connor, R.V., Dorling, A. (eds) Software Process Improvement and Capability Determination. SPICE 2013. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 349. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38833-0_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38833-0_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-38832-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-38833-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics