Advertisement

An Approach to Development of an Application Dependent SPICE Conformant Process Capability Model

  • Michael Boronowsky
  • Antanas Mitasiunas
  • Jonas Ragaisis
  • Tanja Woronowicz
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 349)

Abstract

The Process capability modeling elaborated by the world-wide software engineering community during the last 25 years became a tool for systematization and codifying knowledge and experience of process oriented activities. This tool is designed to improve the predictability of activity results, i.e. process capability. Namely, ISO/IEC 15504 defines a process capability dimension and the requirements for any external process definition to be applicable process capability dimension. Enterprise SPICE defines a domain-independent integrated model for enterprise-wide assessments and pertinent improvement. On the other hand, any application domain contains application specific knowledge and experience that is not covered in width and depth by domain independent process modeling. The purpose of this paper is to address the problem of application dependent SPICE conformant process modeling integrated with application independent components. It will be illustrated with the developer processes of the innovation, knowledge and technology transfer process model innoSPICE.

Keywords

innovation and knowledge transfer process capability model SPICE Enterprise SPICE innoSPICE 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Arelis, S., Besson, J., Mitašiūnas, J., Mitašiūnas, A., Woronowicz, T.: Enhanced innovation and technology transfer model. innoSPICE®: Innovation, Knowledge- and Technology Transfer Capability Maturity Model. Version 1.0, pp. 1–132Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Besson, J., Woronowicz, T., Mitasiunas, A., Boronowsky, M.: Innovation, Knowledge- and Technology Transfer Process Capability Model – innoSPICETM. In: Mas, A., Mesquida, A., Rout, T., O’Connor, R.V., Dorling, A. (eds.) SPICE 2012. CCIS, vol. 290, pp. 75–84. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Boronowsky, M., Woronowicz, T., Mitasiunas, A.: BONITA – Improve Transfer from Universities for Regional Development. In: The Proceedings of the 3rd ISPIM Innovation Symposium held in Quebec City, Canada, December 12-15 (2010) ISBN 978-952-265-004-7Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    CMMI-ACQ, CMMI for Acquisition, Version 1.3. Software Engineering Institute (2010) Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    CMMI-DEV, CMMI for Development, Version 1.3. Software Engineering Institute (2010)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    CMMI-SVC, CMMI for Services, Version 1.3. Software Engineering Institute (2010) Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Enterprise SPICE. An Integrated Model for Enterprise-wide Assessment and Improvement. Technical Report - Issue 1. The Enterprise SPICE Project Team, 184 psl. (September 2010), http://www.enterprisespice.com/page/publication-1
  8. 8.
    Gardner, P.L., Fong, A.Y., Graham, L.S.: From Innovation to Enterprise – the Role of Technology Commercialization in Sustaining Economic Growth. IEEE. Technology Transfer Division, TRIUMF, Canada (2004)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ibrahim, L., Jarzombek, J., Ashford, M., Bate, R., Croll, P., Horn, M., LaBruyere, L., Wells, C.: Safety and Security Extensions for Integrated Capability Maturity Models. U.S. Federal Aviation Administration (2004)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ibrahim, L., Bradford, B., Cole, D., LaBruyere, L., Leinneweber, H., Piszczek, D., Reed, N., Rymond, M., Smith, D., Virga, M., Wells, C.: FAA-iCMM. The Federal Aviation Administration Integrated Capability Maturity Model for Enterprise-wide Improvement. U.S. Federal Aviation Administration (2001)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    ISO/IEC 15504-2, Information Technology – Process Assessment – Part 2: Performing an Assessment. International Standards Organization (2003)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    ISO/IEC 15504-5, Information Technology – Process Assessment – Part 5: An Exemplar Process Assessment Model. International Standards Organization (2006)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mitasiunas, A., Novickis, L.: Enterprise SPICE based education capability maturity model. In: Niedrite, L., Strazdina, R., Wangler, B. (eds.) BIR 2011 Workshops. LNBIP, vol. 106, pp. 102–116. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Oslo Manual. Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation data. A Joint publication of OECD and Eurostat, 3rd edn. (2005)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Narasimhalu, A.D.: PA Research Capability Maturity Model for Managing Technological Innovations. In: PICMET 2006 Proceedings, Istambul, Turkey, July 9-13 (2006)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    People Capability Maturity Model (P-CMM), Version 2.0, 2nd edn. Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University. CMU/SEI-2009-TR-003, ESC-TR-2009-003 (2009)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rombach, D.H., Achatz, R.: Research Collaborations between Academia and Industry. In: Future of Software Engineering (FOSE 2007). IEEE-CS Press, Washington, DC (2007) ISBN 0-7695-2829-5/07Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael Boronowsky
    • 1
  • Antanas Mitasiunas
    • 2
  • Jonas Ragaisis
    • 2
  • Tanja Woronowicz
    • 1
  1. 1.Bremen University, TZIBremenGermany
  2. 2.Vilnius UniversityVilniusLithuania

Personalised recommendations