Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Towards a Domain-Specific Method for Multi-Perspective Hospital Modelling – Motivation and Requirements

  • Conference paper
Design Science at the Intersection of Physical and Virtual Design (DESRIST 2013)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 7939))

Abstract

The paper motivates the design and development of a domain-specific method for Multi-Perspective Hospital Modelling and presents requirements the method should fulfil. The contribution follows the design science research process and the identified requirements serve as basis for evaluating related work from the medical informatics and information systems discipline. As out of all evaluated approaches, the Multi-Perspective Enterprise Modelling method fulfils the requirements to the greatest extent, it is to be extended towards the proposed Multi-Perspective Hospital Modelling method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Nagel, E. (ed.): Das Gesundheitswesen in Deutschland. Struktur, Leistungen, Weiterentwicklung, 5th edn. Deutscher Ärzte-Verlag, Köln (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Field, M.J., Lohr, K.N.: Clinical Practice Guidelines: Directions for a New Program. The National Academies Press (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  3. de Bleser, L., Depreitere, R., De Waele, K., Vanhaecht, K., Vlayen, J., Sermeus, W.: Defining pathways. Journal of Nursing Management 14(7), 553–563 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hsiao, W.C., Sapolsky, H.M., Dunn, D.L., Weiner, S.L.: Lessons of the New Jersey DRG payment system. Health Affairs 5(2), 32–45 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Rotter, T., Kinsman, L., James, E., et al.: Clinical pathways: effects on professional practice, patient outcomes, length of stay and hospital costs (review). Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 7(3) (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Frank, U., van Laak, B.: Anforderungen an Sprachen zur Modellierung von Geschäftsprozessen. Tech Report 34, Universität Koblenz-Landau. Institut für Wirtschaftsinformatik, Koblenz (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Frank, U.: Multi-perspective enterprise modeling: Foundational concepts, prospects and future research challenges. Journal of Software and Systems Modelling (2012), doi:10.1007/s10270-012-0273-9.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Österle, H., Becker, J., Frank, U., Hess, T., Karagiannis, D., et al.: Memorandum on design-oriented information systems research. EJIS 20, 7–10 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hevner, A.R., March, S.T., Park, J., Ram, S.: Design science in information systems research. Management Information Systems Quarterly 28(1), 75–106 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hevner, A.R.: The three cycle view of design science research. SJIS 19(2), 87–92 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Heise, D., Heß, M., Strecker, S., Frank, U.: Rekonstruktion eines klinischen Behandlungs-pfads mithilfe domänenspezifischer Erweiterungen einer Geschäftsprozessmodellierungssprache: Anwendungsfall und Sprachkonzepte. In: Thomas, O., Nüttgens, M. (eds.) Dienstleistungsmodellierung 2010, pp. 210–227. Physica, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Moody, D.L.: The physics of notations: Toward a scientific basis for constructing visual notations in software engineering. IEEE TSE 35(6), 756–779 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Heß, M., Schlieter, H., Täger, G.: Modellierung komplexer Entscheidungssituationen in Prozessmodellen – Anwendung am Beispiel der Tumorklassifikation bei Weichteilsarkomen. In: Thomas, O., Nüttgens, M. (eds.) Dienstleistungsmodellierung 2012, pp. 268–290. Springer, Gabler (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Jung, J.: Entwurf einer Sprache für die Modellierung von Ressourcen im Kontext der Geschäftsprozessmodellierung. Logos, Berlin (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Küttner, T., Roeder, N.: Definition Klinischer Behandlungspfade. In: Roeder, N., Küttner, T. (eds.) Klinische Behandlungspfade. Mit Standards erfolgreicher arbeiten, pp. 19–27. Deutscher Ärzte-Verlag, Köln (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Short, M.S.: Charting by Exception on a Clinical Pathway. Nursing Management 28(8), 45–46 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Frank, U.: Outline of a method for designing domain-specific modelling languages. ICB Research Report 42, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Tuddenham, W.J.: The use of logical flow charts as an aid in teaching roentgen diagnosis. American Journal of Rentgenology 102(4), 797–803 (1968)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Society for Medical Decision Making: Proposal for Clinical Algorithm Standards. Medical Decision Making 12(2), 149–154 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ohno-Machado, L., Gennari, J.H., Murphy, S., Jain, N.L., et al.: The guideline interchange format: A model for representing guidelines. JAMIA 5, 357–372 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Peleg, M., Tu, S., Bury, J., Ciccarese, P., et al.: Comparing Computer-interpretable Guideline Models: A Casestudy Approach. JAMIA 10(1), 52–68 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Peleg, M., Boxwala, A.A., Tu, S., Wang, D., Ogunyemi, O., Zeng, Q.: Guideline Interchange Format 3.5 Technical Specification (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Sutton, D., et al.: Evaluation of PROforma as a language for implementing medical guidelines in a practical context. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 6, 1–11 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Tu, S., Campbell, J.R., Glasgow, J., Nyman, M.A., et al.: The sage guideline model: Achievements and overview. JAMIA 14(5), 589–598 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Keller, G., Nüttgens, M., Scheer, A.W.: Semantische Prozeßmodellierung auf der Grundlage Ereignisgesteuerter Prozeketten (EPK). Heft 89, Universität des Saarlandes, Institut für Wirtschaftsinformatik, Saarbrücken (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Staud, J.: Geschäftsprozessanalyse. Ereignisgesteuerte Prozessketten und objektorientierte Geschäftsprozessmodellung für Betriebswirtschaftliche Standardsoftware, 3rd edn. Springer, Berlin (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Software AG: ARIS Method. ARIS Platform. Version 7.2, Darmstadt (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Chen, P.P.S.: The Entity Relationship Model – Toward a Unified View of Data. ACM TODS 1(1), 9–36 (1976)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. OMG: Unified Modeling Language Specification Version 2.3 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  30. OMG: Business Process Model And Notation (BPMN). Version 2.0 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Kaplan, R.S., Norton, D.P.: The balanced scorecard – measures that drive performances. Harvard Business Review 70(1), 71–79 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Frank, U.: MEMO: Visual Languages for Enterprise Modelling. Tech Report 18, Universität Koblenz-Landau, Institut für Wirtschaftsinformatik, Koblenz (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Frank, U.: MEMO Organisation Modelling Language (2): Focus on Business Processes. ICB Research Report 49, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Frank, U.: MEMO Organisation Modelling Language (1): Focus on Organisational Structure. ICB-Research Report 48, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Frank, U., Lange, C.: E-MEMO: A Method to support the Development of customized Electronic Commerce Systems. ISeB 5(2), 93–116 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Kirchner, L.: Eine Methode zur Unterstützung des IT-Managements im Rahmen der Unternehmensmodellierung. Logos, Berlin (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Strecker, S., et al.: MetricM: A modeling method in support of the reflective design and use of performance measurement systems. ISeB 10(2), 241–276 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Schauer, H.: Unternehmensmodellierung für das Wissensmanagement – Eine multi-perspektivische Methode zur ganzheitlichen Analyse und Planung. VDM, Saarbrücken (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Frank, U.: The MEMO Meta Modelling Language (MML) and Language Architecture, 2nd edn. ICB-Research Report 43, University of Duisburg-Essen (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Gulden, J., Frank, U.: MEMOCenterNG. A full-featured modeling environment for organisation modeling and model-driven software development. In: Proceedings of the CAiSE 2010, Hammamet (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Rumbaugh, J., et al.: The unified modeling language reference manual, 2nd edn. Addison-Wesley, Boston (2005)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Research Group Information Systems and Enterprise Modelling, Institute for Computer Science and Business Information Systems, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, University of Duisburg-Essen, Germany

    Michael Heß

Authors
  1. Michael Heß
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Information Systems, University of Liechtenstein, Fürst-Franz-Josef-Strasse 21, 9490, Vaduz, Liechtenstein

    Jan vom Brocke

  2. Department of Information and Service Economy, Aalto University, Chydenia (Runeberginkatu 22-24), P.O. Box 21220, 00076, Aalto, Finland

    Riitta Hekkala  & Matti Rossi  & 

  3. Department of Management Information Systems, Eller College of Management, University of Arizona, 430J McClelland Hall, 85721, Tucson, AZ, USA

    Sudha Ram

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Heß, M. (2013). Towards a Domain-Specific Method for Multi-Perspective Hospital Modelling – Motivation and Requirements. In: vom Brocke, J., Hekkala, R., Ram, S., Rossi, M. (eds) Design Science at the Intersection of Physical and Virtual Design. DESRIST 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7939. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38827-9_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38827-9_25

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-38826-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-38827-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation