Skip to main content

Sustainability: Ethical Perspectives

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Sustainable Entrepreneurship

Part of the book series: CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance ((CSEG))

  • 4724 Accesses

Abstract

According to Aristotle economics can be categorized either as Politics, Technology or Ethics. Regardless which philosophical approach one chooses, however, economics is basically about pursuing conceptions of good life, about managing life and life situations. “Economics” is linked to running an “oikos”, a household – household economics can be considered a central reference point for any kind of management structure. Household economics demand that a household be set up, maintained and if necessary extended and should be a place providing the structure and framework needed for a ‘good’ life. The household itself is not the ‘good’ life, it provides the favourable conditions – environment – in which a good life can take root and develop. Central to good management and good development are a sense of care, permanence and persistence, moderation, regularity and a sense of neighbourliness. One vital aspect which should not be overlooked here is that the house and its household is not created by some ‘invisible hand’ but is the product of human making: a structure built on, via and enabling human existence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Literature

  • Bröckling, U. (2007). Das unternehmerische Selbst. Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, J. (2005). Collapse. How societies choose to fail or succeed. New York: Viking.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, L. J. (2001). Saint Benedict’s rule for monasteries. translated from the Latin by Leonard J. Doyle OblSB.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrenberg, A. (2009). The Weariness of the Self. Diagnosing the history of depression in the contemporary age, with a preface by Allan Young. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press 2009. (The French original was published 1998 and entitled “La Fatigue d’être soi”.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Elon, A. (1988). Founder: A portrait of the first Rothschild and his time. London: Penguin (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, N. (1999). The house of Rothschild. Money’s prophets 1798–1848. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inauen, E., & Frey, B. S. (2008). Benediktinerabteien aus ökonomischer Sicht. Working Paper No. 388. Institute for Empirical Research in Economics, University of Zurich, Zürich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landes, D. (1999). The wealth and poverty of nations. London: Abacus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewicki, R. J., & Wiethoff, C. (2000). Trust, trust development, and trust repair. In M. Deutsch & P. T. Coleman (Eds.), The handbook of conflict resolution: Theory and practice (pp. 86–107). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (2001). Einführende Bemerkungen zu einer Theorie symbolisch generalisierter Kommunikationsmedien, in: Aufsätze und Reden. Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margalit, A. (1996). The decent society. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Max-Neef, M. (1991). Human scale development. Conception, application and further reflections. New York: The Apex Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Natella, S., et al. (2008). Intangible infrastructure: Building on the foundation. Zurich: Credit Suisse Research Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. (2001). Upheaval of thought. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R. (2002). In search of “non-disease”. British Medical Journal, 324, 883–885.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warfield, K., et al. (2007). Framing infrastructure in a cultural context. Working Paper 3. Centre of Expertise on Culture and Communities. Burnaby, British Columbia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, D. (1988). Rothschild. The wealth and power of a dynasty (pp. 38–44). New York: Scribner.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Clemens Sedmak .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sedmak, C. (2014). Sustainability: Ethical Perspectives. In: Weidinger, C., Fischler, F., Schmidpeter, R. (eds) Sustainable Entrepreneurship. CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38753-1_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics