Skip to main content

SBRS: Bridging the Gap between Biomedical Research and Clinical Practice

  • Conference paper
Natural and Artificial Models in Computation and Biology (IWINAC 2013)

Abstract

The field of Biomedical research is currently one with the greatest social impact and publication volume, providing continuous advances and results which should, to a great extent, reach the general clinical practice. Similarly, direct clinical experience may offer experimental results and conclusions which may lead, guide and foster new investigations. However, this interaction between research and clinical practice is yet too far from being optimal. On one side, research results are published without standardization, suffering terminological issues, which prevent its automatic handling and great scale information treatment/management. On the other, for the practitioner, the task of reviewing papers, bibliography, experimental results, etc. in order to keep updated his everyday clinical practice, is very time consuming, causing not to be done continuously.

The implantation of Information Technologies in the biomedical research field has developed numerous search and bibliographic management resources, existing a current trend towards building and publishing open access terminologies, ontological knowledge models and big datasets with biomedical content. All together, beside Semantic Web technologies, methodologies and Linked Open Data and AI techniques, conforms a technological framework which gives the opportunity to bridge the gap between research and clinical practice to support the physician in evidence based decision making.

In this work, as a starting point to the final aim of linking research and clinical practice, we describe a Semantic Bibliographical Recommender System (SBRS) based on patient profile integrated with electronic health record (EHR) which, without closing the loop, offers to the medical professional the latest and most significant experimental evidences related to his concrete case study. The system’s functionality and utility is exemplified through real life psychiatric cases, assisted by an expert psychiatrist.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Corlan, A.D.: Medline trend: automated yearly statistics of PubMed results for any query (2004), http://dan.corlan.net/medline-trend.html

  2. C. for medicinal products for human use (CHMP), ICH guideline E2B (R3) Electronic transmission of individual case safety reports (ICSRs) - implementation guide - data elements and message specification (2011), http://www.emea.europa.eu/docs/enGB/documentlibrary/Scientificguideline/2009/09/WC500002767.pdf

  3. Bero, L.A., Grilli, R., Grimshaw, J.M., Harvey, E., Oxman, A.D., Thomson, M.A.: Getting research findings into practice: Closing the gap between research and practice: an overview of systematic reviews of interventions to promote the implementation of research findings. BMJ 317(7156), 465–468 (1998), http://www.bmj.com/content/317/7156/465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Stearns, M., Price, C.: SNOMED clinical terms: overview of the development process and project status. In: Proceedings of the AMIA (2001), http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2243297/

  5. Ashburner, M., Ball, C., Blake, J.: Gene Ontology: tool for the unification of biology. Nature …(2000), http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmc3037419/

  6. Rosse, C., Mejino, J.L.V.: A reference ontology for biomedical informatics: the Foundational Model of Anatomy. Journal of biomedical informatics 36(6), 478–500 (2003), http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14759820

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Fox, P.T., Lancaster, J.L.: Opinion: Mapping context and content: the BrainMap model. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 3(4), 319–321 (2002), http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11967563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Pu, P., Chen, L., Hu, R.: Evaluating recommender systems from the user’s perspective: survey of the state of the art. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 22(4-5), 317–355 (2012), http://www.springerlink.com/index/10.1007/s11257-011-9115-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Pazzani, M., Billsus, D.: Content-based recommendation systems. In: The adaptive web, pp. 325–341 (2007), http://www.springerlink.com/index/QQ35WT68L6774261.pdf

  10. Turner, J.A., Laird, A.R.: The cognitive paradigm ontology: design and application. Neuroinformatics 10(1), 57–66 (2012), http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21643732

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. W3C, Computer-based Patient Record Ontology (2009), http://code.google.com/p/cpr-ontology/

  12. Martínez-Costa, C., de Andrade, A., Karlsson, D.: Towards the harmonization of Clinical Information and Terminologies by Formal Representation. In: EJBI, vol. 8(3) (2012), http://www.ejbi.org/img/ejbi/2012/3/Costa_en.pdf

  13. Declerck, G., Hussain, S., Parès, Y., Daniel, C.: Semantic-sensitive extraction of EHR data to support adverse drug event reporting (2011), http://www.srdc.com.tr/projects/salus/docs/ICSR_Reporting_Tool_SWAT4LS_V2.pdf

  14. Laleci, G., Yuksel, M., Dogac, A.: Providing Semantic Interoperability between Clinical Care and Clinical Research Domains. IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine: A Publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society c, 1–14 (2012), http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23008263

    Google Scholar 

  15. Andrejko, A., Bieliková, M.: Comparing instances of ontological concepts for personalized recommendation in large information spaces. Computing and Informatics 28, 429–452 (2012), http://www.cai.sk/ojs/index.php/cai/article/viewArticle/45

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gilboa-Schechtman, E., Avnon, L.: Emotional processing in eating disorders: specific impairment or general distress related deficiency? Depression and …(2006), http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/da.20163/abstract

  17. Hatch, A., Madden, S., Kohn, M.: Anorexia nervosa: towards an integrative neuroscience model. European Eating …(2010), http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/erv.974/abstract

  18. Ortego Saenz de Cabezón, A., Espina Eizaguirre, A.: Alexithymia and its relationships with anxiety and depression in eating disorders. Personality and …(2004), http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886903000990

  19. Thompson-Brenner, H., Westen, D.: Personality subtypes in eating disorders: validation of a classification in a naturalistic sample. The British Journal of Psychiatry (2005), http://bjp.rcpsych.org/content/186/6/516.short

  20. Pathak, J., Kiefer, R., Chute, C.: Applying linked data principles to represent patient’s electronic health records at Mayo clinic: a case report. In: …Symposium on International Health …, pp. 455–464 (2012), http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2110415

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Timón-Reina, S., Martínez-Tomás, R., Rincón-Zamorano, M., García-Sáiz, T., Díaz-López, E., Molina-Ruíz, R.M. (2013). SBRS: Bridging the Gap between Biomedical Research and Clinical Practice. In: Ferrández Vicente, J.M., Álvarez Sánchez, J.R., de la Paz López, F., Toledo Moreo, F.J. (eds) Natural and Artificial Models in Computation and Biology. IWINAC 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7930. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38637-4_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38637-4_20

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-38636-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-38637-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics