Abstract
For mobile and multi-channel information systems it is often relevant to model where something is supposed to take place and what equipment is used. Whereas traditional business process modelling notations seldom capture context, this paper looks at the possibility of extending BPMN diagrams with visual means for capturing location and equipment types used in mobile work processes. A wide range of possible ways for doing this visually is discussed and illustrated, whereupon the most viable alternatives are compared analytically mainly based on principles suggested by Moody. The results indicate that there are several approaches to include such usage context information visually with reasonably good results, but that approaches using intuitive icons to reflect locations and equipment types appear to be the most promising.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Fowler, M., Scott, K.: UML Distilled: A brief guide to the standard object modeling language, 2nd edn. Addison-Wesley Professional, Reading (2000)
Jacobson, I., et al.: Object-Oriented Software Engineering: A Use Case Driven Approach. Addison-Wesley, Boston (1992)
Gopalakrishnan, S., Sindre, G.: Alternative Process Notations for Mobile Information Systems. In: Popplewell, K., et al. (eds.) Enterprise Interoperability IV. Making the Internet of the Future for the Future of Enterprise, pp. 13–23. Springer, London (2010)
Gopalakrishnan, S., Krogstie, J., Sindre, G.: Adapting UML Activity Diagrams for Mobile Work Process Modelling: Experimental Comparison of Two Notation Alternatives. In: van Bommel, P., Hoppenbrouwers, S., Overbeek, S., Proper, E., Barjis, J., et al. (eds.) PoEM 2010. LNBIP, vol. 68, pp. 145–161. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)
Gopalakrishnan, S., Krogstie, J., Sindre, G.: Adapted UML Activity Diagrams for Mobile Work Processes: Experimental comparison of colour and pattern fills. In: Halpin, T., Nurcan, S., Krogstie, J., Soffer, P., Proper, E., Schmidt, R., Bider, I. (eds.) BPMDS 2011 and EMMSAD 2011. LNBIP, vol. 81, pp. 314–331. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)
Gopalakrishnan, S., Sindre, G.: Diagram Notations for Mobile Work Processes. In: Johannesson, P., Krogstie, J., Opdahl, A.L. (eds.) PoEM 2011. LNBIP, vol. 92, pp. 52–66. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)
Gopalakrishnan, S., Krogstie, J., Sindre, G.: Extending Use and Misuse Cases to Capture Mobile Information Systems. In: Fallmyr, T. (ed.) Norsk Konferanse for Organisasjoners Bruk av Informasjonsteknologi (NOKOBIT). Tapir, Trondheim (2011)
Gopalakrishnan, S., Krogstie, J., Sindre, G.: Extending Use and Misuse Case Diagrams to Capture Multi-Channel Information Systems. In: Abd Manaf, A., Zeki, A., Zamani, M., Chuprat, S., El-Qawasmeh, E. (eds.) ICIEIS 2011, Part I. CCIS, vol. 251, pp. 355–369. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)
Krogstie, J., Lyytinen, K., Opdahl, A.L., Pernici, B., Siau, K., Smolander, K.: Mobile Information Systems - Research Challenges on the conceptual and logical levels. In: Olivé, À., Yoshikawa, M., Yu, E.S.K. (eds.) ER 2003. LNCS, vol. 2784, pp. 124–135. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)
Kristoffersen, S., Ljungberg, F.: Mobile Use of IT. In: 22nd Information Systems Research Seminar in Scandinavia, Jyväskylä, Finland (1999)
Esbjörnsson, M.: Work in Motion: Interpretation of Defects along the Roads. In: The 24th Information Systems Research Seminar in Scandinavia, Bergen, Norway (2001)
Veijalainen, J.: Developing Mobile Ontologies; who, why, where, and how? In: International Conference on Mobile Data Management. IEEE, Manheim (2007)
Dourish, P.: Re-space-ing place: “place” and “space” ten years on. In: Proceedings of the 2006 20th Anniversary Conference on Computer supported Cooperative Work, pp. 299–308. ACM, Banff (2006)
Harrison, S., Dourish, P.: Re-place-ing space: the roles of place and space in collaborative systems. In: Proceedings of the 1996 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, pp. 67–76. ACM, Boston (1996)
Nossum, A., Krogstie, J.: Integrated Quality of Models and Quality of Maps. In: Halpin, T., Krogstie, J., Nurcan, S., Proper, E., Schmidt, R., Soffer, P., Ukor, R. (eds.) BPMDS 2009 and EMMSAD 2009. LNBIP, vol. 29, pp. 264–276. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)
Decker, M., et al.: Modeling Mobile Workflows with BPMN. In: International Conference on Mobile Business/Global Mobility Roundtable (2010)
Decker, M.: Modelling Location-Aware Access Control Constraints for Mobile Workflows with UML Activity Diagrams. In: 3rd International Conference on Mobile Ubiquitous Computing, Systems, Services and Technologies, Sliema, Malta (2009)
Baumeister, H., Koch, N., Kosiuczenko, P., Wirsing, M.: Extending Activity Diagrams to Model Mobile Systems. In: Akşit, M., Mezini, M., Unland, R. (eds.) NODe 2002. LNCS, vol. 2591, pp. 278–293. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)
Kosiuczenko, P.: Sequence Diagrams for Mobility. In: Olivé, À., Yoshikawa, M., Yu, E.S.K. (eds.) ER 2003. LNCS, vol. 2784, pp. 147–155. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)
Kusek, M., Jezic, G.: Extending UML Sequence Diagrams to Model Agent Mobility. In: Padgham, L., Zambonelli, F. (eds.) AOSE 2006. LNCS, vol. 4405, pp. 51–63. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)
Mendling, J., Recker, J., Reijers, H.A.: On the Usage of Labels and Icons in Business Process Models. International Journal of Information System Modeling and Design 1(2), 40–58 (2010)
Wand, Y., Weber, R.A.: On the Ontological Expressiveness of Information Systems Analysis and Design Grammars. Journal of Information Systems (1993)
Recker, J., et al.: Do Process Modelling Techniques Get Better? A Comparative Ontological Analysis of BPMN. In: 16th Australasian Conference on Information Systems, Sydney (2005)
Lindland, O.I., Sindre, G., Sølvberg, A.: Understanding Quality In Conceptual Modelling. IEEE Software 11(2), 42–49 (1994)
Krogstie, J.: Model-based development and Evolution of Information Systems. Springer (2012)
Aagesen, G., Krogstie, J.: Analysis and design of business processes using BPMN. In: Handbook on Business Process Management. Springer (2010)
Recker, J., Rosemann, M., Krogstie, J.: Ontology-versus pattern-based evaluation of process modeling languages: a comparison. Comm. Assoc. Inform. Syst. 20, 774–799 (2007)
Wahl, T., Sindre, G.: An Analytical Evaluation of BPMN Using a Semiotic Quality Framework. In: Siau, K. (ed.) Advanced Topics in Database Research, vol. 5, pp. 94–105. IGI Global (2006)
Moody, D.L.: The “Physics” of Notations: Toward a Scientific Basis for Constructing Visual Notations in Software Engineering. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 35, 756–779 (2009)
Bertin, J.: Semiology of Graphics: Diagrams, Networks, Maps. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison (1983)
Genon, N., Heymans, P., Amyot, D.: Analysing the cognitive effectiveness of the BPMN 2.0 visual notation. In: Malloy, B., Staab, S., van den Brand, M. (eds.) SLE 2010. LNCS, vol. 6563, pp. 377–396. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)
Silver, B.: BPMN Method & Style, 2nd edn. Cody-Cassidy Press (2012)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Sindre, G., Krogstie, J., Gopalakrishnan, S. (2013). Visually Capturing Usage Context in BPMN by Small Adaptations of Diagram Notation. In: Nurcan, S., et al. Enterprise, Business-Process and Information Systems Modeling. BPMDS EMMSAD 2013 2013. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 147. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38484-4_23
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38484-4_23
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-38483-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-38484-4
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)