Skip to main content
  • 1686 Accesses

Abstract

This article based on DEA correction model studies the efficiency of 13 commercial banks in China from 1997 to 2008. The result indicated that the efficiency of this 13 commercial banks as a whole was rising, but in which the joint stock commercial banks’ efficiency value better than the state owned commercial banks’. From the perspective of efficiency improvement, there were big differences among 13 commercial banks, but in short that 4 state owned commercial banks’ efficiency improvement better than 9 joint stock commercial banks’.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 369.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 469.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alhadeff DA (1954) Monopoly and competition in commercial banking of California. University of California Press, California

    Google Scholar 

  • Banker RD, Morey RC (1986) The use of categorical variables in data envelopment analysis. Manage Sci 32(12):1613–1627

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger AN, Humphrey DB (1998) Efficiency of financial institutions: international survey and directions for future research. Eur J Oper Res 98:175–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger AN, Master LJ (1997) Inside the black box: what explains differences in the efficiencies of financial institutions. Banking Finance 21:895–947

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beston JA (1972) The elasticity of scale and scope of the average cost. Am Econ Rev 65(3):492–497

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark JA, Speaker PJ (1994) Economies of scale and scope in banking: evidence from a generalized translog cost function. Q J Bus Econ, vol 33

    Google Scholar 

  • Coelli TJ (1996) A guide to frontier 4.1: a computer program for stochastic production and cost function estimation. Working paper, 96/07

    Google Scholar 

  • Doy JR, Green RH (1993) Data envelopment analysis and multiple criteria decision making. Omega 21(6)

    Google Scholar 

  • Doy JR, Green RH (1994) Efficiency and cross-efficiency in DEA: derivations, meanings and uses. J Opl Res Soc

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrell MJ (1957) The measurement of productive efficiency. J Roy Stat Soc 120:253–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lang G, Welzel P (1996) Efficiency and technical progress in banking Empirical results for a panel of German cooperative banks, vol 20(6), pp 1003–1023

    Google Scholar 

  • Leibenstein H (1966) Allocation efficiency versus ‘X-efficiency’. Am Econ Rev 56:392–415

    Google Scholar 

  • Molyneux P (1997) Big-bank mergers in Europe: an analysis of the cost implications. Economics 64:317–329

    Google Scholar 

  • Sathye M (2003) Efficiency of banks in a developing economy: the case of India. Eur J Oper Res 3:662–671

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schweiger I, Mcgee JS (1961) Chicago banking. J Bus 34(3):203

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hai-qing Yu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Yu, Hq. (2013). Comparative Study of Our Commercial Banks’ Efficiency. In: Qi, E., Shen, J., Dou, R. (eds) The 19th International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38442-4_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics