Skip to main content

Refusing Life-Saving Treatment, Adaptive Preferences, and Autonomy

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics ((SAPERE,volume 10))

Abstract

Consider a case of a patient receiving life-supporting treatment. With appropriate care the patient could be kept alive for several years. Yet his latest prognosis also indicates that his mental abilities will deteriorate significantly and that ultimately he will become incapable of understanding what happens around and to him. Despite his illness, the patient has been eager to live. However, he finds the prospect that he is now faced with devastating. He undergoes an unconscious process that results in his finding himself with a preference to die.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Appelbaum, P.S., Lidz, C.W., Klitzman, R.: Voluntariness of Consent to Research: A Conceptual Model. Hastings Cent Rep. 39, 30–39 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bargh, J.A., Chartrand, T.L.: The Unbearable Automaticity of Being. Am. Psychol. 54, 462–479 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beauchamp, T.L.: Autonomy and Consent. In: Miller, F., Wertheimer, A. (eds.) The Ethics of Consent: Theory and Practice, pp. 55–78. Oxford University Press, New York (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  • Beauchamp, T.L.: Who Deserves Autonomy and Whose Autonomy Deserves Respect? In: Taylor, J.S. (ed.) Personal Autonomy: New Essays in Personal Autonomy and its Role in Contemporary Moral Philosophy, pp. 310–329. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Beauchamp, T.L., Childress, J.F.: Principles of Biomedical Ethics. Oxford University Press, New York (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  • Beauchamp, T.L., Davidson, A.I.: The Definition of Euthanasia. J. Med. Philos 4, 294–312 (1979)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berges, S.: Why Women Hug their Chains: Wollstonecraft and Adaptive Preferences. Utilitas 23, 72–87 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Block, S.D.: Psychological Considerations, Growth, and Transcendence at the End of Life: The Art of the Possible. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 285, 2898–2905 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borge, S.: The Myth of Self-deception. Southern J. Philos 41, 1–28 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bovens, L.: Sour Grapes and Character Planning. J. Philos 89, 57–78 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruckner, D.W.: Colburn on Covert Influences. Utilitas 23, 451–457 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruckner, D.W.: In Defense of Adaptive Preferences. Philos Stud. 142, 307–324 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christman, J.P.: The Politics of Persons: Individual Autonomy and Socio-historical Selves. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2009)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Colburn, B.: Autonomy and Adaptive Preferences. Utilitas 23, 52–71 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colburn, B.: Forbidden Ways of Life. Philos Quart. 58, 618–629 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Courtwright, A.: Justice, Stigma, and The New Epidemiology of Health Disparities. Bioethics 23, 90–96 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elster, J.: Sour Grapes: Studies in the Subversion of Rationality. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, S., Lewis, S., Fallowfield, L.: Psychological Morbidity in Newly Referred Patients with Cancer. J. Psychosom Res. 39, 193–202 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hare, R.M.: Moral Thinking: Its Levels, Method, and Point. Oxford University Press, New York (1981)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, J.: Consent and End of Life Decisions. J. Med. Ethics 29, 10–15 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hassin, R.R., Uleman, J.S., Bargh, J.A. (eds.): The New Unconscious. Oxford University Press, New York (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • Haworth, L.: Autonomy: An Essay in Philosophical Psychology and Ethics. Yale University Press, New Haven (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraut, R.: What is Good and Why: The Ethics of Wellbeing. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, N.: Self-deception and Moral Responsibility. Ratio 17, 294–311 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • May, T.: The Concept of Autonomy in Bioethics: An Unwarranted Fall from Grace. In: Taylor, J.S. (ed.) Personal Autonomy: New Essays on Personal Autonomy and its Role in Contemporary Moral Philosophy, pp. 299–309. Cambridge University Press, New York (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mele, A.R.: Twisted Self-deception. Philos Psychol. 12, 117–137 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mill, J.S.: The Subjection of Women. Hackett Publishing Company, Indianapolis (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mill, J.S.: On Liberty. Penguin Books Ltd., Harmondsworth (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M.: Adaptive Preferences and Women’s Options. Econ. Philos 17, 67–88 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olsaretti, S.: The Concept of Voluntariness – A Reply. J. Polit Philos 6, 112–121 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsaretti, S.: Freedom, Force and Choice: Against the Rights-based Definition of Voluntariness. J. Polit Philos 6, 53–78 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandven, T.: Autonomy, Adaptation, and Rationality: A Critical Discussion of Jon Elster’s Concept of “sour Grapes,” Part I. Philos Soc. Sci. 29, 3–31 (1999a)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandven, T.: Autonomy, Adaptation, and Rationality: A Critical Discussion of Jon Elster’s Concept of “Sour Grapes,” Part II. Philos Soc Sci 29, 173–205 (1999b)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Secker, B.: The Appearance of Kant’s Deontology in Contemporary Kantianism: Concepts of Patient Autonomy in Bioethics. J. Med. Philos 24, 43–66 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A.: Gender Inequality and Theories of Justice. In: Nussbaum, M., Glover, J. (eds.) Women, Culture, and Development, pp. 259–273. Oxford University Press, New York (1995)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sie, M.: Moral Agency, Conscious Control, and Deliberative Awareness. Inquiry 52, 516–531 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, J.D.: Liberalism, Consent, and the Problem of Adaptive Preferences. Soc. Theory Pract. 21, 457–471 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, R.L.: Medical Ethics Needs a New View of Autonomy. J. Med. Philos 33, 594–608 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, T.D.: Strangers to Ourselves: Discovering The Adaptive Unconscious. Belknap Press, Cambridge (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, D.: Sour Grapes, Self-abnegation and Character Building. Monist 86, 220–241 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jukka Varelius .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Varelius, J. (2013). Refusing Life-Saving Treatment, Adaptive Preferences, and Autonomy. In: Räikkä, J., Varelius, J. (eds) Adaptation and Autonomy: Adaptive Preferences in Enhancing and Ending Life. Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics, vol 10. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38376-2_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics