Business Meetings as a Genre—Pedagogical Implications for Teaching Business English

Chapter
Part of the Second Language Learning and Teaching book series (SLLT)

Abstract

Business people spend a considerable amount of their working lives participating in different types of meetings, talking and listening. What makes business meetings difficult to grasp for both researchers and learners is the vast number of factors contributing to them, such as the size of a company, the purpose of the meeting and the relationships among the people involved. This article will try to examine how people in business communicate in meetings to get their work done and will also analyze some of the most recurrent features of the business meeting genre. I will draw on a particular corpus (CANBEC)—a unique resource which brings together descriptions of meetings of different types, both within and among companies, involving speakers, whose roles and responsibilities vary, and who represent a range of nationalities and differing first languages—and on the research carried out by Handford (2010). The analysis of keywords, concordance lines, and discourse provided him with thorough insights into certain aspects of business meetings, such as the structural stages of meetings, participants’ discursive practices useful in meetings, interpersonal language, creativity, power and constraint, and many other factors. In conclusion, I will make practical suggestions for implementing the knowledge of the business meeting, as a genre into the Business English classroom, as well as for the design of educational materials, which will help prepare students to participate efficiently in business meetings of various kinds.

Keywords

Intelligent Business Business People Discursive Practice Business Context Business Meeting 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Charles, M. 1996. Business negotiations: Interdependence between discourse and the business relationship. English for Specific Purposes 15: 19–36.Google Scholar
  2. Drew, P. and J. Heritage. 1992. Analyzing talk at work: An introduction. In Talk at Work, eds. P. Drew and J. Heritage, 3–65. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Fairclough, N. 1995. Critical discourse analysis. London: Longman.Google Scholar
  4. Handford, M. 2010. The language of business meetings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Holmes, J. and M. Stubbe. 2003. Power and politeness in the workplace: a sociolinguistic analysis of talk at work.London: Longman.Google Scholar
  6. Hopper, P. and K. Drummond. 1990. Emergent goals at a relational turning point: The case of Gordon and Denise. In Multiple goals in discourse, eds. K. Tracy and N. Coupland, 39-65. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  7. Koester, A. 2006. Investigating workplace discourse. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Lakoff, R. 1990. Talking power. Chicago: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  9. MacKenzie, I. 2002. English for Business Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  10. McCarthy, M. 2000. Captive audience: small talk and close contact service encounters. In Small talk, ed. J. Coupland, 84–109. Harlow: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
  11. O’Keeffe, A., M. McCarthy and R. Carter. 2007. From corpus to classroom: Language use and language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Rogerson-Revell, P. 2008. Participation and performance in international business meetings. English for Specific Purposes 27: 338–360.Google Scholar
  13. Scollon, R. and S. Scollon. 2001. Intercultural communication: A discourse approach. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  14. Tracy, K. and N. Coupland. 1990. Multiple goals in discourse. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  15. Williams, M. 1988. Language taught for meetings and language used in meetings: is there anything in common? Applied Linguistics 9: 45–58.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.UAM PoznańPoznańPoland

Personalised recommendations