Advertisement

Collaborative Process Design in Cloud Environment

  • Jiří Kolář
  • Tomáš Pitner
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7652)

Abstract

This paper presents an approach to adoption of BPM in an organization, with emphasis on collaboration with process participants. We present subset of our methodology for end-to-end BPM adoption, aimed to describe collaborative processes mapping, iterative process design and further process improvement. Such technique preserves organization’s flexibility as it helps to obtain realistic processes easily adaptable to changing business requirements. We further explain how to foster collaboration by use of a cloud-based environment for process design and define some more general requirements on such environment. We approach general obstacles of BPM adoption observed by practitioners and scientist and explain how the methodology can help to deal with some of those obstacles by involving process participants to collaboration on process design and improvement.

Keywords

Cloud Environment Process Participant Business Process Management Adoption Process Continuous Process Improvement 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Ackoff, R.L.: Re-creating the Corporation: A Design of Organizations for the 21st Century. Oxford University Press, New York (1999)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Jackson, M.C.: Systems Thinking: Creative Holism for Managers. Wiley, Chichester (2003)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jiang, J., Le, J., Wang, Y., Sun, J., He, F.: The BPM Architecture Based on Cloud Computing. In: KAM 2011: Proceedings of the 2011 Fourth International Symposium on Knowledge Acquisition and Modeling. IEEE Computer Society (October 2011)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Smith, H., Fingar, P.: Business Process Management: The Third Wave. Meghan-Kiffer Press, Tampa (2003)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Harmon, P.: Business Process Change: A Manager’s Guide to Improving, Redesigning, and Automating Processes. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (2003)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Raymond, L., Bergeron, F., Rivard, S.: Determinants of business process reengineering success in small and large enterprises: an empirical study in the Canadian context. Journal of Small Business Management 36(1), 72–85 (1998)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jeston, J., Nelis, J.: Business Process Management: Practical Guidelines to Successful Implementations. Butterworth-Heinemann (2008)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Adamides, E., Karacapilidis, N.: ’A knowledge centred framework for collaborative business process modelling’. International Journal of Business Process Management 12(5), 557–575 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fiammante, J.: Dynamic SOA and BPM: Best Practices for Business Process Management and IBM Press (2009)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Singer, R., Zinser, E.: Business process management — S-BPM a new paradigm for competitive advantage? In: Buchwald, H., Fleischmann, A., Seese, D., Stary, C. (eds.) S-BPM ONE 2009. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol. 85, pp. 48–70. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gartner Research: Gartner position on Business Process Management, Gartner Research note, ID: G00136533 (2006)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gartner Business Process Management Summit, Gartner Research note (April 2011)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Indulska, M., Chong, S., Bandara, W., Sadiq, S., Rosemann, M.: Major issues in business process management: a vendor perspective. In: Proceedings of the Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems, PACIS 2007 (2007)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chapman, R., Sloan, T.: Large firms versus small firms - do they implement CI the same way? The TQM Magazine 11(2), 105–110 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Spanos, Y., Practacos, G., Papadakis, V.: Greek firms and EMU: contrasting SMEs and large-sized enterprises. European Management Journal 19(6), 638–648 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kolar, J.: A framework for Business Process Management in small and medium enterprises. Unpublished Dissertation Proposal. Masaryk University (2011)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kolář, J.: Procesní analýza pro Centrum Informačních Technologií Filozofké fakulty MU. Unpublished commercial case study (September 2011b)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kolář, J.: Procesní analýza pro společnost IT Logica s.r.o., Unpublished commercial case study (July 2011c) Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    OMG. Business Motivation Model (BMM) Specification, v1.0. (2008), http://www.omg.org/cgi-bin/doc?formal/08-11-02.pdf (retrieved June 2012)
  20. 20.
    Oryx website from, http://bpt.hpi.uni-potsdam.de/Oryx/ (retrieved June 2012)
  21. 21.
    Dillon, T., Wu, C., Chang, E.: Cloud Computing: Issues and Challenges. In: 2010 24th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications (2010)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mertens, W., Van den Bergh, J., Viaene, S., Schroder-Pander, F.: How bpm impacts jobs: An exploratory field study. IEEE Computer Society (2011)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Chong: Business process management for SMEs: an exploratory study of implementation factors for the Australian wine industry. Journal of Information Systems and Small Business 1(1-2), 41–58 (2007)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Imanipour, N., Talebi, K., Rezazadeh, S.: Obstacles in Business Process Management (BPM) Implementation and Adoption in SMEs (January 23, 2012), SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1990609
  25. 25.
    Aksu, F., Vanhoof, K., De Munck, L.: Evaluation and Comparison of Business Process Modeling Methodologies for Small and Midsized Enterprises Intelligent Systems and Knowledge Engineering, ISKE (2010)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Roser, S., Bauer, B.: A Categorization of Collaborative Business Process Modeling Techniques. In: 7th IEEE International Conference on E-Commerce Technology Workshops (CEC 2005 Workshops), Munchen, Germany, July 19, pp. 43–54. IEEE Computer Society (2005)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Benjamin, P., Erraguntla, M., Mayer, R., Painter, M., Marshall, C.: A Framework for Adaptive Process Modeling and Execution (FAME), wetice. In: Seventh International Workshop on Enabling Technologies: Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises, p. 3 (1998)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Bruno, G., Dengler, F., Jennings, B., Khalaf, R., Nurcan, S., Prilla, M., Sarini, M., Schmidt, R., Silva, R.: Key challenges for enabling agile BPM with social software. Journal of Software Maintenance and Evolution: Research and Practice 23(4), 297–326 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Dengler, F., Lamparter, S., Hefke, M., Abecker, A.: Collaborative Process Development using Semantic MediaWiki. In: Proc. of 5th Conf. of Prof. Knowl. Management (2009)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Morecroft, J.: Mental models and learning in system dynamics practice. In: Pidd, M. (ed.) Systems Modelling: Theory and Practice, pp. 101–126. Wiley, Chichester (2004)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jiří Kolář
    • 1
  • Tomáš Pitner
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of InformaticsMasaryk UniversityBrnoCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations