Advertisement

ICOM: A Framework for Integrated Collaborative Work Environments

  • Kenneth Baclawski
  • Eric Chan
  • Laura Drǎgan
  • Patrick Durusau
  • Deirdre Lee
  • Peter Yim
  • Yuwang Yin
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7652)

Abstract

Collaboration is an important activity that is increasingly using technology to improve the productivity of the participants. The Integrated Collaboration Object Model (ICOM) is a proposed OASIS standard for interoperation among collaboration services. ICOM is intended to be a framework for integrating a broad range of domain models for collaboration environments. The intention is to encourage independent software vendors and open source communities to create common collaboration clients that interoperate with integrated collaboration platforms and standalone collaboration services across enterprise boundaries. This paper provides an overview of ICOM that covers the high-level concepts, directory, space, access control, metadata, content management, and unified message models. ICOM is represented in several formats: the Java Persistence API, XML Schema, RDF and OWL. We also describe an example application based on ICOM.

Keywords

JPA collaborative work environments Semantic Web 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Zeilenga, K.D.: Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP): Directory Information Models. IETF RFC 4512 (Proposed Standard) (June 2006)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Brown, A., Gur-Esh, E., McVeigh, R., Müller, F.: Content Management Interoperability Services (CMIS), Version 1.0. OASIS Standard (May 2010)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Nuescheler, D.: Content Repository for JavaTM Technology API Version 2.0. (August 2009), http://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=283
  4. 4.
    Dusseault, L.: HTTP Extensions for Web Distributed Authoring and Versioning (WebDAV). IETF RFC 4918 (Proposed Standard) (June 2007)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Crispin, M.: Internet Message Access Protocol Version 4rev1. IETF RFC 2060 (Proposed Standard) (December 1996)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Klensin, J.: Simple mail transfer protocol. IETF RFC 5321 (Draft Standard) (October 2008)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Saint-Andre, P.: Extensible Messaging and Presence Protocol (XMPP): Core. IETF RFC 3920 (Proposed Standard) (October 2004); Obsoleted by RFC 6120, updated by RFC 6122Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Saint-Andre, P.: Extensible Messaging and Presence Protocol (XMPP): Instant Messaging and Presence. IETF RFC 3921 (Proposed Standard) (October 2004) Obsoleted by RFC 6121Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dawson, F., Howes, T.: vCard MIME Directory Profile. IETF RFC 2426 (Proposed Standard) (September 1998)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Desruisseaux, B.: Internet Calendaring and Scheduling Core Object Specification (iCalendar). IETF RFC 5545 (Proposed Standard) (September 2009)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Daboo, C., Desruisseaux, B., Dusseault, L.: Calendaring Extensions to WebDAV (CalDAV). IETF RFC 4791 (Proposed Standard) (March 2007)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Business Process Model and Notation (BPMN) Version 2.0. (January 2011), http://www.omg.org/spec/BPMN/2.0
  13. 13.
    Jordan, D., Evdemon, J.: Web Services Business Process Execution Language (WSBPEL), Version 2.0. OASIS Standard (April 2007)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ings, D.: WS-BPEL Extension for People (BPEL4People) Specification, Version 1.1. OASIS Committee Specification (August 2010)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ings, D.: Web Services — Human Task (WS-HumanTask) Specification, Version 1.1. OASIS Committee Specification (August 2010)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Brickley, D., Miller, L.: FOAF Vocabulary Specification 0.98 (August 2010), http://xmlns.com/foaf/spec/
  17. 17.
    Berrueta, D., Brickley, D., Decker, S., Fernndez, S., Grn, C., Harth, A., Heath, T., Idehen, K., Kjernsmo, K., Miles, A., Passant, A., Polleres, A., Polo, L., Sintek, M.: SIOC Core Ontology Specification. W3C Member Submission, W3C (June 2007)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Chan, E.S., Durusau, P.: Integrated Collaboration Object Model (ICOM) for Interoperable Collaboration Services, Version 1.0. OASIS Committee Specification (August 2012)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Chan, E.S.: OpenICOM: A JPA Framework for Integrated Collaboration Environments, Part 1 (March 2011), http://today.java.net/article/2011/03/21/openicom-jpa-framework-integrated-collaboration-environments-part-1
  20. 20.
    Hong Kong, J., Koren, Y., De Dauw, J.: Semantic Result Formats (2012), http://semantic-mediawiki.org/wiki/Semantic_Result_Formats
  21. 21.
    Prud’hommeaux, E., Seaborne, A.: SPARQL Query Language for RDF. W3C Recommentation, W3C (January 2008)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kenneth Baclawski
    • 1
  • Eric Chan
    • 2
  • Laura Drǎgan
    • 3
  • Patrick Durusau
    • 4
  • Deirdre Lee
    • 3
  • Peter Yim
    • 5
  • Yuwang Yin
    • 1
  1. 1.Northeastern UniversityBostonUSA
  2. 2.Oracle CorporationRedwood ShoresUSA
  3. 3.Digital Enterprise Research InstituteGalwayIreland
  4. 4.ConsultantUSA
  5. 5.CIM Engineering, Inc. (“CIM3”)San MateoUSA

Personalised recommendations