Advertisement

Merging Disease-Specific Clinical Guidelines to Handle Comorbidities in a Clinical Decision Support Setting

  • Borna Jafarpour
  • Syed Sibte Raza Abidi
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7885)

Abstract

From a clinical decision support perspective the treatment of co-morbid diseases is a challenge since it demands the coordination between the disease-specific therapeutic plans of the co-morbid diseases. Although clinical guidelines provide clinical recommendations, they focus on a single disease and for comorbid disease management there is a requirement to have multiple concurrently active clinical guidelines. Merging computerized clinical practice guidelines (CPG) related to comorbidities and using them in clinical decision support systems is a potential solution to manage comorbidities in a clinical decision support system. We have developed a CPG merging framework to merge computerized CPG. The central aspect of our framework is a merge representation ontology that captures the merging criteria to achieve the merging of multiple CPG whilst satisfying medical, workflow, institutional and temporal constraints. We have used our framework successfully to create therapy plans for patients treated for Atrial Fibrillation and Chronic Heart Failure comorbidity.

Keywords

Practice Guideline OWL SWRL Comorbidity Execution Engine 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Hing, M.M., Michalowski, M., Wilk, S., Michalowski, W., Farion, K.: Identifying Inconsistencies in Multiple Clinical Practice Guidelines for a Patient with Co-Morbidity. In: 2010 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine Workshops (BIBMW), pp. 447–452. IEEE Press (2010)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Abidi, S.R.: A Knowledge Management Framework to Develop, Model, Align and Operationalize Clinical Pathways to Provide Decision Support for Comorbid Diseases, PhD dissertation, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada (2010)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Real, F., Riaño, D.: Automatic Combination of Formal Intervention Plans Using SDA* representation model. In: Riaño, D. (ed.) K4CARE 2007. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4924, pp. 75–86. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jafarpour, B., Abidi, S.R., Abidi, S.S.R.: Exploiting OWL reasoning services to execute ontologically-modeled clinical practice guidelines. In: Peleg, M., Lavrač, N., Combi, C. (eds.) AIME 2011. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 6747, pp. 307–311. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Abidi, S.R.: A conceptual framework for ontology based automating and merging of clinical pathways of comorbidities. In: Riaño, D. (ed.) K4HelP 2008. LNCS, vol. 5626, pp. 55–66. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lozano, E., Marcos, M., Martínez-Salvador, B., Alonso, A., Alonso, J.R.: Experiences in the Development of Electronic Care Plans for the Management of Comorbidities. In: Riaño, D., ten Teije, A., Miksch, S., Peleg, M. (eds.) KR4HC 2009. LNCS, vol. 5943, pp. 113–123. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Borna Jafarpour
    • 1
  • Syed Sibte Raza Abidi
    • 1
  1. 1.Computer Science DepartmentDalhousie UniversityHalifaxCanada

Personalised recommendations