Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Stellenwert von Zytologie, Biopsie und HPV-Test

  • Chapter
Kolposkopie in der Praxis

  • 1624 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Die Zytologie ist ein wichtiger Bestandteil der Zervixdiagnostik. Ebenso anerkannt ist die Biopsieentnahme als Teil der kolposkopischen Triage. Welche Bedeutung den HPVTestverfahren zukommt, wird hingegen kontrovers diskutiert. Unabdingbar für die Kolposkopie sind Kenntnisse der Morphologie und der molekularbiologischen Verfahren, die im Folgenden dargestellt werden.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Al-Alwan NA (2001) Colposcopy, cervical cytology and human papillomavirus detection as screening tools for cervical cancer. East Mediterr Health J 7:100–105

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Alonso I, Torne A, Puig-Tintore LM, Esteve R, Quinto L, Campo E, Pahisa J, Ordi J (2006) Pre- and post-conization high-risk HPV testing predicts residual/recurrent disease in patients treated for CIN 2-3. Gynecol Oncol 103:631–636

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (2005) ACOG Practice Bulletin. Clinical Management Guidelines for Obstetrician-Gynecologists. Number 61, April 2005. Human papillomavirus. Obstet Gynecol 105:905–918

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arbyn M, Bergeron C, Klinkhamer P, Martin-Hirsch P, Siebers AG, Bulten J (2008) Liquid compared with conventional cervical cytology: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 111:167–177

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ashfaq R, Gibbons D, Vela C, Saboorian MH, Iliya F (1999) ThinPrep Pap Test. Accuracy for glandular disease. Acta Cytol 43:81–85

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bae JH, Kim CJ, Park TC, Namkoong SE, Park JS (2007) Persistence of human papillomavirus as a predictor for treatment failure after loop electrosurgical excision procedure. Int J Gynecol Cancer 17(6):1271–1277

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bae-Jump VL, Bauer M, Van Le L (2007) Cytological evaluation correlates poorly with histological diagnosis of vulvar neoplasias. J Low Genit Tract Dis 11:8–11

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Becker V (1979) Carl Ruge: 100 Jahre Stückchen-Diagnose. Arch Gynecol 227:193–204

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Belinson J, Qiao YL, Pretorius R, Zhang WH, Elson P, Li L, Pan QJ, Fischer C, Lorincz A, Zahniser D (2001) Shanxi Province Cervical Cancer Screening Study: a cross-sectional comparative trial of multiple techniques to detect cervical neoplasia. Gynecol Oncol 83:439–444

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Böcking A, Nguyen VQ (2004a) Diagnostic and prognostic use of DNA image cytometry in cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions and invasive carcinoma. Cancer 102:41–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Böcking A, Nguyen VQH, Reich O, Pickel H (2004b) Abnormer Pap-Abstrich: DNA-Bildzytometrie ermittelt Progressionsrisiko. Frauenarzt 45:194–196

    Google Scholar 

  • Böhmer G, Petry KU, Iftner T, Brummer O, Günter HH, Flemming P, Kühnle H (2002) Der DNS-Nachweis humaner Papillomaviren mittels Hybrid Capture ist als sekundäre Screeningmethode bei rezidivierenden atypischen Abstrichen der Befundklasse Pap IIID ungeeignet. Zentralbl Gynäkol 124:111–115

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bollmann R, Böcking A, Ikenberg H, Jordan B (2006 Stellungnahme zu Methoden der Flüssigkeitszytologie. Frauenarzt 47:136–139)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bollmann R, Jordan B (2005) Technische Voraussetzungen einer validierten Flüssigkeitszytologie. Frauenarzt 46:420–405

    Google Scholar 

  • Bos AB, van Ballegooijen M, Elske van den Akker-van Marle M, Hanselaar AG, van Oortmarssen GJ, Habbema JD (2001) Endocervical status is not predictive of the incidence of cervical cancer in the years after negative smears. Am J Clin Pathol 115:851–855

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Byrom J, Douce G, Jones PW, Tucker H, Millinship J, Dhar K, Redman CW (2006) Should punch biopsies be used when high-grade disease is suspected at initial colposcopic assessment? A prospective study. International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society 16: 253–256

    Google Scholar 

  • Castle PE, Wentzensen N, Wheeler CM, Rydzak G, Schiffman M (2009) Effect of the number of biopsies on the subsequent acquisition of new human papillomavirus infections. Obstet Gynecol 114:1057–1062

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ceballos KM, Chapman W, Daya D, Julian JA, Lytwyn A, McLachlin CM, Elit L (2008) Reproducibility of the histological diagnosis of cervical dysplasia among pathologists from 4 continents. Intern J Gynecol 27:101–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costa S, Negri G, Sideri M, Santini D, Martinelli G, Venturoli S, Pelusi C, Syrjanen S, Syrjanen K, Pelusi G (2007) Human papillomavirus (HPV) test and PAP smear as predictors of outcome in conservatively treated adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) of the uterine cervix. Gynecol Oncol 106(1):170–176

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cuzick J, Clavel C, Petry KU, Meijer CJ, Hoyer H, Ratnam S, Szarewski A, Birembaut P, Kulasingam S, Sasieni P, Iftner T (2006) Overview of the European and North American studies on HPV testing in primary cervical cancer screening. Intern J Cancer 119:1095–1101

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Davey E, Barratt A, Irwig L, Chan SF, Macaskill P, Mannes P, Saville AM (2006) Effect of study design and quality on unsatisfactory rates, cytology classifications, and accuracy in liquid-based versus conventional cervical cytology: a systematic review. Lancet 367:122–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davey E, d’Assuncao J, Irwig L, Macaskill P, Chan SF, Richards A, Farnsworth A (2007) Accuracy of reading liquid based cytology slides using the ThinPrep Imager compared with conventional cytology: prospective study. BMJ 335:31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dennerstein G (2009) Vulvar cytology: useful or not? Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease 13: 192; author reply 192

    Google Scholar 

  • Driggers RW, Zahn CM (2008) To ECC or not to ECC: the question remains. Obstetrics and gynecology clinics of North America 35: 583–597; viii

    Google Scholar 

  • Elias A, Linthorst G, Bekker B, Vooijs PG (1983) The significance of endocervical cells in the diagnosis of cervical epithelial changes. Acta Cytol 27:225–229

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Flenker H (2003) Taschenatlas der gynäkologischen Zytologie. IDwerk, Bremen

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox J, Remington P, Layde P, Klein G (1999) The effect of hysterectomy on the risk of an abnormal screening Papanicolaou test result. Am J Obstet Gynecol 180:1104–1109

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gage JC, Hanson VW, Abbey K, Dippery S, Gardner S, Kubota J, Schiffman M, Solomon D, Jeronimo J (2006) Number of cervical biopsies and sensitivity of colposcopy. Obstet Gynecol 108:264–272

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Galgano MT, Castle PE, Atkins KA, Brix WK, Nassau SR, Stoler MH (2010) Using biomarkers as objective standards in the diagnosis of cervical biopsies. Am J Surg Pathol 34:1077–1087

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Griesser H, Marquardt K, Jordan B, Kühn W, Neis K, Neumann H, Bollmann R, Pöschel B, Steiner M, Schenck U (2013) Gynäkologische Zytodiagnostik der Zervix. Münchner Nomenklatur III. Frauenarzt 54:1042–1048

    Google Scholar 

  • Hess R (2005) Änderung der Richtlinien über die Früherkennung von Krebserkrankungen. Deutsches Ärzteblatt 102:A2975

    Google Scholar 

  • Ikenberg H (2011) Computerassistierte Diagnostik in der Zervixzytologie. Pathologe 32:476–483

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jimenez-Ayala M, Jimenez-Ayala B (2002) Terminology for vulvar cytology based on the Bethesda System. Acta Cytol 46:645–650

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Khan MJ, Castle PE, Lorincz AT, Wacholder S, Sherman M, Scott DR, Rush BB, Glass AG, Schiffman M (2005) The elevated 10-year risk of cervical precancer and cancer in women with human papillomavirus (HPV) type 16 or 18 and the possible utility of type-specific HPV testing in clinical practice. J Natl Cancer Inst 97: 1072–1079

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinney W, Stoler MH, Castle PE (2010) Special commentary: patient safety and the next generation of HPV DNA tests. Am J Clin Pathol 134:193–199

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kivlahan C, Ingram E (1986) Papanicolaou smears without endocervical cells. Are they inadequate? Acta Cytologica 30:258–260

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Klug SJ, Neis KJ, Harlfinger W, Malter A, Konig J, Spieth S, Brinkmann- Smetanay F, Kommoss F, Weyer V, Ikenberg H (2012) A randomized trial comparing conventional cytology to liquid-based cytology and computer assistance. Intern J Cancer 132(12):2849–2857

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lellé R (2007) HPV-Test nicht sinnvoll bei zytologischem Dysplasieverdacht - Korrelation von Zervixzytologie, Histologie und HPVStatus. Frauenarzt 48:356–359

    Google Scholar 

  • Lellé R, Bettendorf O, Eltze E (2007) Forum Zytologie: Die zervikale intraepitheliale Neoplsie (CIN) – 5. Teil. Praktische Gyn 12:30–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Lelle RJ, Cordes A, Regidor M, Maier E, Flenker H (2007) Vergleich der ThinPrep®-Dünnschichtzytologie mit der konventionellen zervikalen Exfoliativzytologie in einem Risikokollektiv unter Verwendung der Münchener Nomenklatur II. Gynakol Geburtshilfliche Rundsch 47:81–87

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Luyten A, Scherbring S, Reinecke-Lüthge A, Braun BE, Pietralla M, Theiler K, Petry KU (2009) Risk-adapted primary HPV cervical cancer screening project in Wolfsburg, Germany – Experience over 3 years. J Clin Virol 46: S5–S10

    Google Scholar 

  • Luzzatto R, Boon ME (1996) Contribution of the endocervical Cytobrush sample to the diagnosis of cervical lesions. Acta Cytol 40:1143–1147

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mangold BR, Nauth HF (2008) Konisation oder kolposkopisch gesteuerte Portiobiopsie? Vergleich der Wertigkeit der beiden Verfahren bei zytologischem Verdacht auf CIN III. Frauenarzt 49:522–527

    Google Scholar 

  • Marquardt K, Broschewitz U, Büttner HH, Barten M (2007) Zervixkarzinom trotz Früherkennungsprogramm - Analyse von Teilnahmeraten und Tumorstadium. Frauenarzt 48:1086–1088

    Google Scholar 

  • Marquardt K, Buttner HH, Broschewitz U, Barten M, Schneider V (2011) Persistent carcinoma in cervical cancer screening: non-participation is the most significant cause. Acta Cytol 55:433–437

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Massad LS (2006) More is more: improving the sensitivity of colposcopy. Obstet Gynecol 108:246–247

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mayrand MH, Duarte-Franco E, Rodrigues I, Walter SD, Hanley J, Ferenczy A, Ratnam S, Coutlee F, Franco EL (2007) Human papillomavirus DNA versus Papanicolaou screening tests for cervical cancer. N Engl J Med 357:1579–1588

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mehlhorn G, Obermann E, Negri G, Bubendorf L, Mian C, Koch M, Sander H, Simm B, Lutge M, Banrevi Z, Weiss A, Cathomas G, Hilfrich R, Wilhelm Beckmann M, Griesser H (2013) HPV L1 detection discriminates cervical precancer from transient HPV infection: a prospective international multicenter study. Modern Pathology 26:967–974

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moscicki AB, Shiboski S, Broering J, Powell K, Clayton L, Jay N, Darragh TM, Brescia R, Kanowitz S, Miller SB, Stone J, Hanson E, Palefsky J (1998) The natural history of human papillomavirus infection as measured by repeated DNA testing in adolescent and young women. J Pediatr 132:277–284

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nam JH, Kim HS, Lee JS, Choi HS, Min KW, Park CSA (2004) comparison of modified MonoPrep2 of liquid-based cytology with Thin- Prep Pap test. Gynecol Oncol 94:693–698

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Narine N, Young W (2007) Transformation zone sampling rate is a useful performance indicator for practitioners collecting cervical samples using SurePath(TM) liquid-based cytology system. Cytopathology 18:220–224

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Naucler P, Ryd W, Tornberg S, Strand A, Wadell G, Elfgren K, Radberg T, Strander B, Forslund O, Hansson BG, Rylander E, Dillner J (2007) Human papillomavirus and Papanicolaou tests to screen for cervical cancer. N Engl J Med 357:1589–1597

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nauth HF, Mangold BR (2009) Klinische Konsequenzen bei positiven gynäkologischen Abstrichbefunden. Gynäkol Prax 33:265–276

    Google Scholar 

  • Nauth HF (2013) Gynäkologische Zytodiagnostik: Lehrbuch und Atlas. Thieme, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Nocon M, Mittendorf T, Roll S, Greiner W, Willich SN, von der Schulenburg JM (2007) Welchen medizinischen und gesundheitsökonomischen Nutzen hat die Kolposkopie als primäres Screening auf das Zervixkarzinom? Schriftenreihe Health Technology Assessment. Köln: DIMDI

    Google Scholar 

  • Pecorelli S (2009) Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the vulva, cervix, and endometrium. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 105:103–104

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Petry KU, Bohmer G, Iftner T, Davies P, Brummer O, Kuhnle H (2002) Factors associated with an increased risk of prevalent and incident grade III cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and invasive cervical cancer among women with Papanicolaou tests classified as grades I or II cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 186: 28–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Petry KU, Luyten A, Scherbring S (2013) Accuracy of colposcopy management to detect CIN3 and invasive cancer in women with abnormal screening tests: Results from a primary HPV screening project from 2006 to 2011 in Wolfsburg, Germany. Gynecol Oncol 128:282–287

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Petry KU, Menton S, Menton M, van Loenen-Frosch F, de Carvalho GH, Holz B, Schopp B, Garbrecht-Buettner S, Davies P, Boehmer G, van den Akker E, Iftner T (2003) Inclusion of HPV testing in routine cervical cancer screening for women above 29 years in Germany: results for 8466 patients. Br J Cancer 88: 1570–1577

    Google Scholar 

  • Petry KU, Schmidt D, Scherbring S, Luyten A, Reinecke-Luthge A, Bergeron C, Kommoss F, Loning T, Ordi J, Regauer S, Ridder R (2011) Triaging Pap cytology negative, HPV positive cervical cancer screening results with p16/Ki-67 Dual-stained cytology. Gynecol Oncol 121:505–509

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Prato B, Ghelardi A, Gadducci A, Marchetti I, Di Cristofano C, Di Coscio G, Bevilacqua G, Genazzani AR (2008) Correlation of recurrence rates and times with posttreatment human papillomavirus status in patients treated with loop electrosurgical excision procedure conization for cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions. Int J Gynecol Cancer 18 (1): 90–4

    Google Scholar 

  • Pretorius RG, Belinson JL, Azizi F, Peterson PC, Belinson S (2012) Utility of Random Cervical Biopsy and Endocervical Curettage in a Low-Risk Population. J Low Genit Tract Dis 16(4):333–338

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pretorius RG, Zhang WH, Belinson JL, Huang MN, Wu LY, Zhang X, Qiao YL (2004) Colposcopically directed biopsy, random cervical biopsy, and endocervical curettage in the diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia II or worse. Am J Ostet Gynecol 191:430–434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ravarino A, Nemolato S, Macciocu E, Fraschini M, Senes G, Faa G, Negri G (2012) CINtec PLUS immunocytochemistry as a tool for the cytologic diagnosis of glandular lesions of the cervix uteri. Am J Clin Pathol 138:652–656

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Renshaw AA, Mody DR, Wang E, Haja J, Colgan TJ (2006) Hyperchromatic crowded groups in cervical cytology – differing appearances and interpretations in conventional and ThinPrep preparations: a study from the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program in Cervicovaginal Cytology. Arch Pathol Lab Med 130: 332–336

    Google Scholar 

  • Renshaw AA, Young NA, Birdsong GG, Styer PE, Davey DD, Mody DR, Colgan TJ (2004) Comparison of performance of conventional and ThinPrep gynecologic preparations in the College of American Pathologists Gynecologic Cytology Program. Arch Pathol Lab Med 128:17–22

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rimiene J, Petronyte J, Gudleviciene Z, Smailyte G, Krasauskaite I, Laurinavicius A (2010) A Shandon PapSpin liquid-based gynecological test: A split-sample and direct-to-vial test with histology follow-up study. Cytojournal 7:2

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ruge C, Veit J (1881) Der Krebs der Gebärmutter. Stuttgart: Enkeoo

    Google Scholar 

  • Saslow D, Solomon D, Lawson HW, Killackey M, Kulasingam SL, Cain J, Garcia FA, Moriarty AT, Waxman AG, Wilbur DC, Wentzensen N, Downs LS Jr., Spitzer M, Moscicki AB, Franco EL, Stoler MH, Schiffman M, Castle PE, Myers ER (2012) American Cancer Society, American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology, and American Society for Clinical Pathology screening guidelines for the prevention and early detection of cervical cancer. Am J Clin Pathol 137:516–542

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sawaya GF (2008) Evidence-based medicine versus liquid-based cytology. Obstet Gynecol 111:2–3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sawaya GF, Sox HC (2007) Trials that matter: liquid-based cervical cytology: disadvantages seem to outweigh advantages. Ann Intern Med 147:668–669

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schenck U (2011) Aspekte zur Weiterentwicklung der Münchner Nomenklatur. Verh Dtsch Ges Zyt 27:21–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt D, Bergeron C, Denton KJ, Ridder R, European CINtec Cytology Study Group (2011) p16/ki-67 dual-stain cytology in the triage of ASCUS and LSIL papanicolaou cytology: results from the European equivocal or mildly abnormal Papanicolaou cytology study. Cancer Cytopathol 119:158–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider A, Hoyer H, Lotz B, Leistritza S, Kuhne-Heid R, Nindl I, Muller B, Haerting J, Durst M (2000) Screening for high-grade cervical intra-epithelial neoplasia and cancer by testing for high-risk HPV, routine cytology or colposcopy. Int J Cancer 89:529–534

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Selvaggi SM, Guidos BJ (2002) Endocervical component: is it a determinant of specimen adequacy? Diagn Cytopathol 26:53–55

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sherman ME, Lorincz AT, Scott DR, Wacholder S, Castle PE, Glass AG, Mielzynska-Lohnas I, Rush BB, Schiffman M (2003) Baseline cytology, human papillomavirus testing, and risk for cervical neoplasia: a 10-year cohort analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst 95:46–52

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Siebert U, Muth C, Sroczynski C, Velasco-Garrido M, Gerhardus A, Gibis BH (2003) Dünnschichtpräparationen und computergestützte Untersuchungen von Zervixabstrichen – Medizinische Effektivität, gesundheitsökonomische Evaluation und systematische Entscheidungsanalyse. Health technology assessment; Bd. 35. Sankt Augustin: Asgard

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon D, Schiffman M, Tarone R (2001) Comparison of three management strategies for patients with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance: baseline results from a randomized trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 93:293–299

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Solomon D, Stoler M, Jeronimo J, Khan M, Castle P, Schiffman M (2007) Diagnostic utility of endocervical curettage in women undergoing colposcopy for equivocal or low-grade cytologic abnormalities. Obstet Gynecol 110:288–295

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spiegelman D, Schneeweiss S, McDermott A (1997) Measurement error correction for logistic regression models with an »alloyed gold standard«. Am J Epidemiol 145:184–196

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stoler MH, Vichnin MD, Ferenczy A, Ferris DG, Perez G, Paavonen J, Joura EA, Djursing H, Sigurdsson K, Jefferson L, Alvarez F, Sings HL, Lu S, James MK, Saah A, Haupt RM (2011) The accuracy of colposcopic biopsy: analyses from the placebo arm of the Gardasil clinical trials. Int J Cancer 128:1354–1362

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stoler MH, Wright TC Jr., Sharma A, Apple R, Gutekunst K, Wright TL (2011) High-risk human papillomavirus testing in women with ASC-US cytology: results from the ATHENA HPV study. Am J Clin Pathol 135:468–475

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stubbe M, Broschewitz U, Kramm G, Schmidt W, Radtke A (2011) Analyse der Konisationen im Zeitraum von 2005 – 2009 in Rostock. Geburtsh Frauenheilk 71:187–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tavassoli FA, Devilee P (2003) Pathology and genetics of tumours of the breast and female genital organs. Lyon: IARC Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsoumpou I, Arbyn M, Kyrgiou M, Wentzensen N, Koliopoulos G, Martin-Hirsch P, Malamou-Mitsi V, Paraskevaidis E (2009) p16(INK4a) immunostaining in cytological and histological specimens from the uterine cervix: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Cancer Treatment Reviews 35:210–220

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • van den Einden LC, Grefte JM, van der Avoort IA, Vedder JE, van Kempen LC, Massuger LF, de Hullu JA (2012) Cytology of the vulva: feasibility and preliminary results of a new brush. Brit J Cancer 106:269–273

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Verguts J, Bronselaer B, Donders G, Arbyn M, Van Eldere J, Drijkoningen M, Poppe W (2006) Prediction of recurrence after treatment for high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: the role of human papillomavirus testing and age at conisation. BJOG 113:1303–1307

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wentzensen N, Schwartz L, Zuna RE, Smith K, Mathews C, Gold MA, Allen RA, Zhang R, Dunn ST, Walker JL, Schiffman M (2012) Performance of p16/Ki-67 immunostaining to detect cervical cancer precursors in a colposcopy referral population. Clin Cancer Res 18:4154–4162

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weynand B, Berliere M, Haumont E, Massart F, Pourvoyeur A, Bernard P, Donnez J, Galant C (2003) A new, liquid-based cytology technique. Acta Cytol 47:149–153

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wilbur DC, Black-Schaffer WS, Luff RD, Abraham KP, Kemper C, Molina JT, Tench WD (2009) The Becton Dickinson FocalPoint GS Imaging System: clinical trials demonstrate significantly improved sensitivity for the detection of important cervical lesions. Am J Clin Pathol 132:767–775

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wu S, Meng L, Wang S, Ma D (2005) A comparison of four screening methods for cervical neoplasia. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 91:189–193

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yoshida T, Sano T, Kanuma T, Inoue H, Itoh T, Yazaki C, Obara M, Fukuda T (2011) Usefulness of CINtec(R) PLUS p16/Ki-67 double-staining in cytological screening of cervical cancer. Acta Cytol 55:413–420

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zuchna C, Hager M, Tringler B, Georgoulopoulos A, Ciresa-Koenig A, Volgger B, Widschwendter A, Staudach A (2010) Diagnostic accuracy of guided cervical biopsies: a prospective multicenter study comparing the histopathology of simultaneous biopsy and cone specimen. Am J Obstet Gynecol 203:321–326

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Universitätsfrauenklinik, Münster

    Univ.-Prof. Dr. med. Ralph J. Lellé

  2. Zytologisches Labor, Dysplasie Sprechstunde, Düsseldorf

    PD Dr. med. Volkmar Küppers

Authors
  1. Univ.-Prof. Dr. med. Ralph J. Lellé
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. PD Dr. med. Volkmar Küppers
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lellé, R., Küppers, V. (2014). Stellenwert von Zytologie, Biopsie und HPV-Test. In: Kolposkopie in der Praxis. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38308-3_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38308-3_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-38307-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-38308-3

  • eBook Packages: Medicine (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation