Detection of Texture and Isolated Features Using Alternating Morphological Filters
Recently, we introduced a morphological texture contrast (MTC) operator that allows detection of textural and non-texture regions in images. In this paper we provide comparison of the MTC with other available techniques. We show that, in contrast to other approaches, the MTC discriminates between texture details and isolated features, and does not extend borders of texture regions. Using the ideas underlying the MTC operator, we develop a complementary operator called morphological feature contrast (MFC) that allows extraction of isolated features while not being confused by texture details. We illustrate an application of the MFC operator for extraction of isolated objects such as individual trees or buildings that should be distinguished from forests or urban centers. We furthermore provide an example of how this operator can be used for detection of isolated linear structures. We also derive an extended version of the MFC that works with vector-valued images.
KeywordsLocal Binary Pattern Texture Region Texture Detection Texture Area Signal Inversion
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Dinstein, I., Fong, A., Ni, L., Wong, K.: Fast discrimination between homogeneous and textured regions. In: Proc. of Int. Conf. on Pattern Recognition, Montreal, Canada (1984)Google Scholar
- 2.Gonzalez, R.C., Woods, R.E.: Digital Image Processing (2001)Google Scholar
- 5.Pesaresi, M., Gerhardinger, A., Kayitakire, F.: A robust built-up area presence index by anisitropic rotation-invariant textural measure. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observation an Remote Sensing 1 (September 2008)Google Scholar
- 7.Bergman, R., Nachlieli, H., Ruckenstein, G.: Detection of textured areas in natural images using an indicator based on component counts. J. Electronic Imaging 17(4) (2008)Google Scholar
- 9.Zingman, I., Saupe, D., Lambers, K.: Morphological operators for segmentation of high contrast textured regions in remotely sensed imagery. In: Proc. of the IEEE Int. Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, Munich, Germany (July 2012)Google Scholar
- 10.Serra, J.: Image Analysis and Mathematical Morphology, vol. 2: Theoretical Advances. Academic Press (1988)Google Scholar
- 15.Fukunaga, K.: Introduction to Statistical Pattern Recognition. Academic Press, Inc. (1990)Google Scholar
- 16.Salembier, P.: Comparison of some morphological segmentation algorithms based on contrast enhancement - application to automatic defect detection. In: European Signal Processing Conference, Barcelona, Spain, pp. 833–836 (September 1990)Google Scholar
- 17.Lambers, K., Zingman, I.: Towards detection of archaeological objects in high-resolution remotely sensed images: the Silvretta case study. In: Proc. of Computer Appl. and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology, UK (2012) (in press)Google Scholar
- 19.Hanbury, A.: The morphological top-hat operator generalised to multi-channel images. In: Proc. of the Int. Conf. on Pattern Recognition, pp. 672–675 (August 2004)Google Scholar