Semantic Web for the Humanities

  • Albert Meroño-Peñuela
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7882)


Researchers have been interested recently in publishing and linking Humanities datasets following Linked Data principles. This has given rise to some issues that complicate the semantic modelling, comparison, combination and longitudinal analysis of these datasets. In this research proposal we discuss three of these issues: representation round-tripping, concept drift, and contextual knowledge. We advocate an integrated approach to solve them, and present some preliminary results.


Semantic Web Formats Concept Drift Contexts 


  1. 1.
    Carroll, J.J.: Signing RDF Graphs. Tech. Rep. HPL-2003-142, HP Lab (2003)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fanizzi, N., d’Amato, C., Esposito, F.: Conceptual Clustering and Its Application to Concept Drift and Novelty Detection. In: Bechhofer, S., Hauswirth, M., Hoffmann, J., Koubarakis, M. (eds.) ESWC 2008. LNCS, vol. 5021, pp. 318–332. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gonçalves, R.S., Parsia, B., Sattler, U.: Analysing multiple versions of an ontology: A study of the NCI Thesaurus. In: Proceedings of the 24th International Workshop on Description Logics, DL 2011 (2011),
  4. 4.
    Guha, R., McCool, R., Fikes, R.: Contexts for the Semantic Web. In: McIlraith, S.A., Plexousakis, D., van Harmelen, F. (eds.) ISWC 2004. LNCS, vol. 3298, pp. 32–46. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gulla, J.A., et al.: Semantic Drift in Ontologies. In: Filipe, J., Cordeiro, J. (eds.) WEBIST 2010, Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Web Information Systems and Technologies, pp. 13–20. INSTICC Press (2010)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Han, L., Parr, C., Sachs, J., Joshi, A.: RDF123: a mechanism to transform spreadsheets to RDF. Tech. rep., University of Maryland, Baltimore County (2007)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Korotkiy, M., Top, J.L.: From Relational Data to RDFS Models. In: Koch, N., Fraternali, P., Wirsing, M. (eds.) ICWE 2004. LNCS, vol. 3140, pp. 430–434. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Krisnadhi, A., Maier, F., Hitzler, P.: OWL and rules. In: Polleres, A., d’Amato, C., Arenas, M., Handschuh, S., Kroner, P., Ossowski, S., Patel-Schneider, P. (eds.) Reasoning Web 2011. LNCS, vol. 6848, pp. 382–415. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kuukkanen, J.M.: Making Sense of Conceptual Change. History and Theory 47, 351–372 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Meroño-Peñuela, A., et al.: Linked humanities data: The next frontier? A case-study in historical census data. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Linked Science (LISC 2012). International Semantic Web Conference, ISWC (2012),
  11. 11.
    Peñaloza, R., Baader, F., Knechtel, M.: Context-Dependent Views to Axioms and Consequences of Semantic Web Ontologies. Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web 12 (2012)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ramanujam, S., et al.: R2D: Extracting Relational Structure from RDF Stores. In: Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Joint Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology, WI-IAT 2009, vol. 01, pp. 361–366. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sequeda, J.F., Arenas, M., Miranker, D.P.: On directly mapping relational databases to RDF and OWL. In: Proceedings of the 21st World Wide Web Conference, WWW 2012, pp. 649–658. ACM, New York (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wang, S., Schlobach, S., Klein, M.: What Is Concept Drift and How to Measure It? In: Cimiano, P., Pinto, H.S. (eds.) EKAW 2010. LNCS, vol. 6317, pp. 241–256. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Albert Meroño-Peñuela
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Computer ScienceVU University AmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations