Abstract
Small and medium enterprises need external assistance to accomplish their information systems initiatives. Governments have been addressing this by funding numerous programmes. The aim of the chapter is to understand these programmes. Doing so, the analysis focused on the discretion in programme worker activities and the contexts that influence workers’ choices. The findings indicate that programme workers tend to exert considerable discretion. This discretion appears to be the result of inadequate evaluation and auditing mechanisms, a probable collaboration of policy administrators, as well as broad and ambiguous policies. Apart from this, programmes tend to operate within problematic contexts. These contexts are composed of poor evaluation mechanisms, power of programmes over SMEs, scarcity of resources, low demand for programme services and alienation of workers. A relevant implication is that the improvement of contexts could also reduce discretion. However, the actors that could do this are located at diverse parts of the system. Therefore, the reform of programmes is a difficult task given the priorities and power of the participants. Finally, the chapter suggests that SME associations may represent a counteractive force to these policy influences in order to materialise policy reforms.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Reproduced from Sect. 3 of Vega et al. (2013).
- 2.
© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing, 2011.
References
Bannock, G., & Peacock, A. (1989). Government and small business. London: Paul Chapman.
Bennett, R. (2011). Local business voice: The history of chambers of commerce in Britain, Ireland, and Revolutionary America 1760–2011. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Berkeley, N., Clark, D., & Ilbery, B. (1996). Regional variation in business use of information and communication technologies and implications for policy: Case study evidence from rural England. Geoforum, 27(1), 75–86.
Bovens, M., Hart, P., & Kuipers, S. (2006). The politics of policy evaluation. In M. Moran, M. Rein, & R. Goodin (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of public policy (pp. 319–335). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Coen, C. (1998). The European interest and the nation state: Large-firm lobbying in the European Union and member states. Journal of Public Policy, 18(1), 75–100.
Cuadrado, J., & Garcia, A. (2004). ICT policies for SMEs and regional disparities: The Spanish case. Entrepreneurship and Enterprise Development, 16(1), 55–75.
Curran, J., Berney, R., & Kuusisto, J. (1999). A critical evaluation of industry SME support policies in the United Kingdom and the Republic of Ireland—Stage one report: Introduction to SME policies and their evaluation. Helsinski: Ministry of Trade and Industry of Finland.
Dahler-Larsen, P. (2005). Evaluation and public management. In E. Ferlie, L. Lynn Jr, & C. Pollitt (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of public management (pp. 615–639). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dannreuther, C. (1999). Discrete dialogues and the legitimation of EU SME policy. Journal of European Public Policy, 6(3), 436–455.
Department for Business, Innovation and Skills (2010). Backing small business. British Government. http://www.bis.gov.uk/assets/biscore/enterprise/docs/b/10-1243-backing-small-business.pdf. Accessed 5 February 2011.
Ellis, K., Davis, A., & Rummery, K. (1999). Needs, assessment, street-level bureaucracy and the new community care. Social Policy and Administration, 33(3), 262–280.
Evans, T., & Harris, J. (2004). Street-level bureaucracy, social work and the (exaggerated) death of discretion. British Journal of Social Work, 34(6), 871–895.
Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean. (2008). San Salvador Commitment: Plan of action eLAC 2010. United Nations. http://www.eclac.cl/socinfo/noticias/noticias/3/32363/2008-2-TICs-San_Salvador_Commitment.pdf. Accessed 18 June 2012.
European Commission. (2010). ICT and e-business for an innovative and sustainable economy. DG Enterprise and Industry. http://www.empirica.com/themen/ebusiness/documents/EBR09-10.pdf. Accessed 10 June 2012.
Gengatharen, D., Standing, C., & Burn, J. (2005). Government supported community portal: Regional e-marketplaces for SMEs—evidence to Support a staged approach. Electronic Markets, 15(4), 405–417.
Greene, J., Mole, K., & Storey, D. (2008). Three decades of enterprise culture: Entrepreneurship, economic regeneration and public policy. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Harrison, S. (1998). Clinical autonomy and health policy: Past and future. In M. Exworthy & S. Halford (Eds.), Professionals and the new managerialism in the public sector (pp. 50–64). Buckingham: Open University Press.
Hertogh, M. (2009). Through the eyes of bureaucrats: How front-line officials understand administrative justice. In M. Adler (Ed.), Administrative justice in context (pp. 203–225). Oxford: Hart Publishing.
Hill, M. (2009). The public policy process (5th ed.). Essex: Pearson.
Juma, C., & Clarke, N. (1995). Policy research in sub-Saharan Africa: An exploration. Public Administration and Development, 15(2), 121–137.
Lambert, R. (2003). Lambert review of business-university collaboration. Her Majesty’s Treasury. http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/d/lambert_review_final_450.pdf. Accessed 25 February 2011.
Lebre, R. (1996). IT diffusion in small and medium-sized enterprises: Elements for policy definition. Information Technology for Development, 7(4), 169–180.
Lenihan, H., Hart, M., & Roper, S. (2007). Industrial policy evaluation: Theoretical foundations and empirical innovations: New wine in new bottles. International Review of Applied Economics, 21(3), 313–319.
Lewis, J., & Glennerster, H. (1996). Implementing the new community care. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Lipsky, M. (1980). Street-level bureaucracy: The dilemmas of individuals in public services. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Lipsky, M. (2010). Street-level bureaucracy: The dilemmas of individuals in public services (2nd ed.). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
MacDonald, G. (1990). Allocating blame in social work. British Journal of Social Work, 20(6), 525–546.
Martin, L., & Matlay, H. (2001). Blanket approaches to promoting ICT in small firms: Some lessons from the DTI ladder adoption model in the UK. Internet Research, 11(5), 339–410.
Matlay, H., & Addis, M. (2003). Adoption of ICT and e-commerce in small business: An HEI-Based consultancy perspective. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 10(3), 321–335.
Maynard-Moody, S., & Musheno, M. (2003). Cops, teachers, counsellors: Stories from the front lines of public service. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Moran, M. (2009). Business, politics and society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pitts, D. (2007). Representative bureaucracy, ethnicity and public schools: Examining the link between representation and performance. Administration and Society, 39(4), 497–526.
Scott, J. (1990). A matter of record: Documentary sources in social research. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Simpson, M., & Docherty, A. (2004). E-commerce adoption support and advice for UK SMEs. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 11(3), 315–328.
Storey, D. (1994). Understanding the small business sector. Andover: Thomson Learning.
Storey, D. (2006). Evaluating SME policies and programmes: Technical and political dimensions. In M. Casson, B. Yeung, A. Basu, & N. Waldeson (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of entrepreneurship (pp. 248–278). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Talbot, C. (2005). Performance management. In E. Ferlie, L. Lynn Jr, & C. Pollitt (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of public management (pp. 491–517). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (2011). Information economy report—ICTs as an enabler for private sector development. United Nations. http://unctad.org/en/PublicationsLibrary/ier2011_en.pdf. Accessed 15 June 2012.
Vega, A., & Brown, D. (2011). Systems of innovation, multidisciplinarity and methodological pluralism: A realist approach to guide the future of information systems research and practice. In M. Chiasson, O. Hendridsson, H. Karsten, & J. DeGross (Eds.), Researching the future of information systems (pp. 249–1268). New York: Springer.
Vega, A., Brown, D., & Chiasson, M. (2012). Open innovation and SMEs: Exploring policy and scope for improvements in university based public programmes through a multidisciplinary Lens. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research, 18(4), 457–476.
Vega, A., Chiasson, M., & Brown, D. (2007). Extending the research agenda on diffusion of innovations: The role of public programs in the diffusion of e-business innovations. In T. McMaster, D. Wastell, E. Ferneley, & J. DeGross (Eds.), Organisational dynamics of technology-based innovation: Diversifying the research agenda (pp. 379–392). New York: Springer.
Vega, A., Chiasson, M., Brown, D. (2011). Adoption and programme contexts effect in the support to the informatisation of SMEs. Paper presented at the 34th Institute for Small Business and Entrepreneurship (ISBE) Conference: Sustainable Futures: Enterprising Landscapes and Communities, Sheffield, 9–10 November.
Vega, A., Chiasson, M., Brown, D. (2013). Understanding the causes of informal and formal discretion in the delivery of enterprise policies: A multiple case study. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 31(1), 102–118
Wiggins, A. (2010). Worlds apart: SMEs, e-business and policy initiatives. Saarbrucken: LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing.
Winter, S. (2000). Information Asymmetry and Political Control of Street-Level Bureaucrats: Danish Agro-Environmental Regulation. Paper presented at the 22nd Annual Research Meeting of the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management (APPAM), Seattle, 2–4 November.
Yin, R. (2009). Case study research: Design and method (4th ed.). London: Sage Publications.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Arturo, V., Mike, C. (2014). Government Support to Information Systems Innovation in Small and Medium Enterprises. In: Devos, J., van Landeghem, H., Deschoolmeester, D. (eds) Information Systems for Small and Medium-sized Enterprises. Progress in IS. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38244-4_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38244-4_17
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-38243-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-38244-4
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsBusiness and Management (R0)