Skip to main content

Ontic Openness as Key Factor in the Evolution of Biological Systems

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Evolutionary Biology: Exobiology and Evolutionary Mechanisms

Abstract

The heterogenic character of biological systems has as a consequence that calculations of their possible combinatorial constellations very soon run into numerical explosions. This means, that the resulting numbers—so-called immense numbers—exhibit orders of magnitude beyond any physical meaning. Such a high number of possibilities cause another property—named ontic openness by the physicist W. M. Elsasser—to emerge within such systems. All biological systems possess the feature of being ontic open and this is of great importance to evolution, as ontic openness not only guarantees a development of the system to take place, but also interferes with our chances to fully comprehend this evolutionary processes sensu lato. Thus ontic openness implies an extremely high level of uncertainty and unpredictability. On the one hand, we have a certainty that “something” is bound to happen within the system—on the other hand, we can be totally sure that we will never be able to forecast exactly whatever that “something” will be. At lower levels of biological hierarchy, e.g., the molecular level represented by molecules like DNA, RNA, and proteins, ontic openness seems pretty easy to comprehend. When it comes to more aggregate and even conglomerate systems, i.e., at higher levels of biological hierarchy, the emergence as well as the expression of this property becomes increasingly obscure. Although definitely present, the property at superior levels tends to be overlooked or neglected. Although the calculations may take different forms—and in spite of finding different causes—the property penetrates through all levels of biological hierarchy. To prevent systems from ending up in a situation where the evolutionary state described by calculations that are incomprehensible or even intractable constraints of the systems are needed. From the different levels some systematic patterns seem to be recognizable. Whereas lower levels find causes inside–upwards to be dominating, at upper levels causes become dominated by outside–inwards interactions. Eventually, the ontic openness is likely to be limited not only by physical dimensions but is also constrained by downward acting factors. One reason for this is that space and time scales are well-known to be tightly coupled throughout the biological hierarchy—smaller scales have fast reaction rates as opposed to large scale with slower functions. Thus, space and time scales become important to the realization of ontic openness. At the same time, a shift occurs that stresses information exchange and treatment together with cognitive processes to be increasingly dominant in the biosemiotics of the ongoing processes. The whole leads to a shift from dominance of objective factors to more subjective ones in the process of evolution. Viewing evolutionary systems as ontic openness systems and pursuing the constraints influencing them may turn out to be a fruitful strategy to the investigation of all developmental processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Allen TFH, Hoekstra TW (1992) Toward a unified ecology. Columbia University Press, New York, p 384

    Google Scholar 

  • Christiansen FB, Fenchel T (2009) Evolution – den forudsigelige vilkårlighed. Aarhus Universitetsforlag, p 226

    Google Scholar 

  • Eigen M, Schuster P (1979) The hypercycle—a principle of natural self-organization. Springer, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Eldredge N, Gould SJ (1972) Punctuated equilibria: an alternative to phyletic gradualism. In: Schopf TJM (ed) Models in paleobiology. Freeman Cooper, San Francisco, pp 82–115

    Google Scholar 

  • Elsasser WM (1958) The physical foundation of biology. An analytical study. Pergamon Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Elsasser WM (1963) Note on evolution in organismic theory. J Theor Biol 4:166–174

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Elsasser WM (1964) Synopsis of organismic theory. J Theor Biol 7:53–67

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Elsasser WM (1966) Atom and organism. A new approach to theoretical biology. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Elsasser WM (1969a) A causal phenomena in physics and biology: a case for reconstruction synopsis of organismic theory. Am Sci 57(4):502–516

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Elsasser WM (1969b) The mathematical expression of generalized complementarity. J Theor Biol 25(2):276–296

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Elsasser WM (1972) A model of biological indeterminacy. J Theor Biol 7:627–633

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elsasser WM (1975) The chief abstractions of biology. North Holland, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Elsasser WM (1981a) A form of logic suited for biology. In: Rosen R (ed) Progress in theoretical biology, vol 6. Academic Press, New York, pp 23–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Elsasser WM (1981b) Principles of a new biological theory: a summary. J Theor Biol 89(1):131–150

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Elsasser WM (1982) The other side of molecular biology. J Theor Biol 96(1):67–76

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Elsasser WM (1983) Biological application of the statistical concepts used in the second law. J Theor Biol 105(1):103–116

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Elsasser WM (1998) Reflections on a theory of organisms. Holism in biology. John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould SJ (1989) Wonderful life: the burgess shale and the nature of history. Hutchinson, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmeyer J, Emmeche C (1991) Code-duality and the semiotics of nature. In: Anderson M, Merrell F (eds) On semiotic modeling. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin and New York, pp 117–166

    Google Scholar 

  • Jørgensen SE (2002) Integration of ecosystem theories: a pattern. Springer, Berlin, p 420

    Google Scholar 

  • Jørgensen SE, Fath B, Bastianoni S, Marques JC, Müller F, Nielsen SN, Patten BC, Tiezzi E, Ulanowicz RE (2007) Chapter 3, ecosystems have ontic openness, p 35–57. In: Jørgensen SE, Fath B, Bastianoni S, Marques JC, Müller F, Nielsen SN, Patten BC, Tiezzi E, Ulanowicz RE (2007) A new ecology: systems perspective. Elsevier, Amsterdam, p 275

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauffman S (1995) At home in the universe: the search for the laws of self- organization and complexity. Oxford University Press, New York, p 325

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauffman SA (2000) Investigations. Oxford University Press, Oxford, p 302

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller SL (1953) Production of amino acids under possible primitive earth conditions. Science 117(3046):528–529

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Miller SL, Urey HC (1959) Organic compound synthesis on the primitive Earth. Science 130(3370):245–251

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen SN (2000) Information in ecosystems. Chapter II.2.2, pp 195–216. In: Jørgensen SE, Müller F (eds) Handbook of ecosystem theories and management. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, p 584

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen SN (2009) Thermodynamic constraints of life as downward causation in ecosystems. Cybern Hum Knowing 16(1–2):27–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen SN, Müller F (2009) Understanding the functional principles of nature—proposing another type of ecosystem services. Ecol Model 220(16):1913–1925

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen SN, Ulanowicz RE (2011) Ontic openness: an absolute necessity for all developmental processes. Ecol Model 222(16):2908–2912

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubin H (2005) Walter Elsasser, prophet of biological complexity, seeker of simplifying rules. Cell Mol Biol 51:599–606

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulanowicz RE (2006) Process ecology: a transactional worldview. J Ecodyn 1:103–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulanowicz RE (2009) A third window. Natural life beyond Newton and Darwin. Templeton Foundation Press, West Conshohocken, p 196

    Google Scholar 

  • von Uexküll J (1926) Theoretical biology. Harcourt, Brace & Co., New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams RJ (1998) Biochemical individuality. The basis for the genetotrophic concept. Keats Publishing, New Canaan, p 267

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Søren Nors Nielsen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Nielsen, S.N., Emmeche, C. (2013). Ontic Openness as Key Factor in the Evolution of Biological Systems. In: Pontarotti, P. (eds) Evolutionary Biology: Exobiology and Evolutionary Mechanisms. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38212-3_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics