Abstract
The heterogenic character of biological systems has as a consequence that calculations of their possible combinatorial constellations very soon run into numerical explosions. This means, that the resulting numbers—so-called immense numbers—exhibit orders of magnitude beyond any physical meaning. Such a high number of possibilities cause another property—named ontic openness by the physicist W. M. Elsasser—to emerge within such systems. All biological systems possess the feature of being ontic open and this is of great importance to evolution, as ontic openness not only guarantees a development of the system to take place, but also interferes with our chances to fully comprehend this evolutionary processes sensu lato. Thus ontic openness implies an extremely high level of uncertainty and unpredictability. On the one hand, we have a certainty that “something” is bound to happen within the system—on the other hand, we can be totally sure that we will never be able to forecast exactly whatever that “something” will be. At lower levels of biological hierarchy, e.g., the molecular level represented by molecules like DNA, RNA, and proteins, ontic openness seems pretty easy to comprehend. When it comes to more aggregate and even conglomerate systems, i.e., at higher levels of biological hierarchy, the emergence as well as the expression of this property becomes increasingly obscure. Although definitely present, the property at superior levels tends to be overlooked or neglected. Although the calculations may take different forms—and in spite of finding different causes—the property penetrates through all levels of biological hierarchy. To prevent systems from ending up in a situation where the evolutionary state described by calculations that are incomprehensible or even intractable constraints of the systems are needed. From the different levels some systematic patterns seem to be recognizable. Whereas lower levels find causes inside–upwards to be dominating, at upper levels causes become dominated by outside–inwards interactions. Eventually, the ontic openness is likely to be limited not only by physical dimensions but is also constrained by downward acting factors. One reason for this is that space and time scales are well-known to be tightly coupled throughout the biological hierarchy—smaller scales have fast reaction rates as opposed to large scale with slower functions. Thus, space and time scales become important to the realization of ontic openness. At the same time, a shift occurs that stresses information exchange and treatment together with cognitive processes to be increasingly dominant in the biosemiotics of the ongoing processes. The whole leads to a shift from dominance of objective factors to more subjective ones in the process of evolution. Viewing evolutionary systems as ontic openness systems and pursuing the constraints influencing them may turn out to be a fruitful strategy to the investigation of all developmental processes.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Allen TFH, Hoekstra TW (1992) Toward a unified ecology. Columbia University Press, New York, p 384
Christiansen FB, Fenchel T (2009) Evolution – den forudsigelige vilkårlighed. Aarhus Universitetsforlag, p 226
Eigen M, Schuster P (1979) The hypercycle—a principle of natural self-organization. Springer, Heidelberg
Eldredge N, Gould SJ (1972) Punctuated equilibria: an alternative to phyletic gradualism. In: Schopf TJM (ed) Models in paleobiology. Freeman Cooper, San Francisco, pp 82–115
Elsasser WM (1958) The physical foundation of biology. An analytical study. Pergamon Press, London
Elsasser WM (1963) Note on evolution in organismic theory. J Theor Biol 4:166–174
Elsasser WM (1964) Synopsis of organismic theory. J Theor Biol 7:53–67
Elsasser WM (1966) Atom and organism. A new approach to theoretical biology. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Elsasser WM (1969a) A causal phenomena in physics and biology: a case for reconstruction synopsis of organismic theory. Am Sci 57(4):502–516
Elsasser WM (1969b) The mathematical expression of generalized complementarity. J Theor Biol 25(2):276–296
Elsasser WM (1972) A model of biological indeterminacy. J Theor Biol 7:627–633
Elsasser WM (1975) The chief abstractions of biology. North Holland, Amsterdam
Elsasser WM (1981a) A form of logic suited for biology. In: Rosen R (ed) Progress in theoretical biology, vol 6. Academic Press, New York, pp 23–63
Elsasser WM (1981b) Principles of a new biological theory: a summary. J Theor Biol 89(1):131–150
Elsasser WM (1982) The other side of molecular biology. J Theor Biol 96(1):67–76
Elsasser WM (1983) Biological application of the statistical concepts used in the second law. J Theor Biol 105(1):103–116
Elsasser WM (1998) Reflections on a theory of organisms. Holism in biology. John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore
Gould SJ (1989) Wonderful life: the burgess shale and the nature of history. Hutchinson, London
Hoffmeyer J, Emmeche C (1991) Code-duality and the semiotics of nature. In: Anderson M, Merrell F (eds) On semiotic modeling. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin and New York, pp 117–166
Jørgensen SE (2002) Integration of ecosystem theories: a pattern. Springer, Berlin, p 420
Jørgensen SE, Fath B, Bastianoni S, Marques JC, Müller F, Nielsen SN, Patten BC, Tiezzi E, Ulanowicz RE (2007) Chapter 3, ecosystems have ontic openness, p 35–57. In: Jørgensen SE, Fath B, Bastianoni S, Marques JC, Müller F, Nielsen SN, Patten BC, Tiezzi E, Ulanowicz RE (2007) A new ecology: systems perspective. Elsevier, Amsterdam, p 275
Kauffman S (1995) At home in the universe: the search for the laws of self- organization and complexity. Oxford University Press, New York, p 325
Kauffman SA (2000) Investigations. Oxford University Press, Oxford, p 302
Miller SL (1953) Production of amino acids under possible primitive earth conditions. Science 117(3046):528–529
Miller SL, Urey HC (1959) Organic compound synthesis on the primitive Earth. Science 130(3370):245–251
Nielsen SN (2000) Information in ecosystems. Chapter II.2.2, pp 195–216. In: Jørgensen SE, Müller F (eds) Handbook of ecosystem theories and management. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, p 584
Nielsen SN (2009) Thermodynamic constraints of life as downward causation in ecosystems. Cybern Hum Knowing 16(1–2):27–49
Nielsen SN, Müller F (2009) Understanding the functional principles of nature—proposing another type of ecosystem services. Ecol Model 220(16):1913–1925
Nielsen SN, Ulanowicz RE (2011) Ontic openness: an absolute necessity for all developmental processes. Ecol Model 222(16):2908–2912
Rubin H (2005) Walter Elsasser, prophet of biological complexity, seeker of simplifying rules. Cell Mol Biol 51:599–606
Ulanowicz RE (2006) Process ecology: a transactional worldview. J Ecodyn 1:103–114
Ulanowicz RE (2009) A third window. Natural life beyond Newton and Darwin. Templeton Foundation Press, West Conshohocken, p 196
von Uexküll J (1926) Theoretical biology. Harcourt, Brace & Co., New York
Williams RJ (1998) Biochemical individuality. The basis for the genetotrophic concept. Keats Publishing, New Canaan, p 267
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Nielsen, S.N., Emmeche, C. (2013). Ontic Openness as Key Factor in the Evolution of Biological Systems. In: Pontarotti, P. (eds) Evolutionary Biology: Exobiology and Evolutionary Mechanisms. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38212-3_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38212-3_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-38211-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-38212-3
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)