Skip to main content

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Water Science and Technology ((BRIEFSWATER))

  • 689 Accesses

Abstract

Two potential heterotrophic-autotrophic denitrification permeable reactive barriers (HAD PRBs) were evaluated to remediate groundwater in situ. The first HAD PRB (Column 1) was packed with a mixture of spongy iron, pine bark and sand between 5 and 145 cm from bottom. The second HAD PRB (Column 2) was filled with a spongy iron and sand mixture layer between 5 and 35 cm from bottom, and a pine bark layer between 35 and 145 cm from bottom. The results showed that during operation over the 45 pore volumes, the influent NO3-N concentration of ≤100 mg/L was mostly denitrified in Columns 1 and 2 at the flow rates of ≤0.30 m/d. The high NO3-N percent removals (97–100 %) for both columns were achieved at hydraulic retention times ranging from 8.75 to 17.51 d. Most of the influent NO3-N was removed in the first 25 cm at the low (23 mg/L) and middle (46 mg/L) NO3-N concentrations and in the first 65 cm at the high concentration (104 mg/L) by Columns 1 and 2. Packing structure had a negligible effect on the performance of the two columns. Both HAD PRBs were highly feasible and effective in in situ groundwater remediation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Abbreviations

AD:

Autotrophic denitrification

BD:

Biological denitrification

BET:

Brunauer-Emmett-Teller

CR:

Chemical reduction

DO:

Dissolved oxygen

HAD:

Heterotrophic-autotrophic denitrification

HD:

Heterotrophic denitrification

HRT:

Hydraulic retention time

MNPR:

Maximum NO3-N percent removal

MVNLR:

Maximum volumetric NO3-N loading rate

PRB:

Permeable reactive barrier

PV:

Pore volume

SD:

Standard deviation

TOC:

Total organic carbon

VNLR:

Volumetric NO3-N loading rate

ZVI:

Zero-valent iron

References

  • Ahn SC, Oh SY, Cha DK (2008) Enhanced reduction of nitrate by zero-valent iron at elevated temperatures. J Hazard Mater 156:17–22

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Alowitz MJ, Scherer MM (2002) Kinetics of nitrate, nitrite, and Cr(VI) reduction by iron metal. Environ Sci Technol 36:299–306

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Darbi A, Viraraghavan T, Butler R, Corkal D (2003) Column studies on nitrate removal from potablewater. Water Air Soil Pollut 150:235–254

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Della Rocca C, Belgiorno V, Meric S (2005) Cotton-supported heterotrophic denitrification of nitrate-rich drinking water with a sand filtration post-treatment. Water SA 31:229–236

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Della Rocca C, Belgiorno V, Meric S (2006) An heterotrophic/autotrophic denitrification (HAD) approach for nitrate removal from drinking water. Process Biochem 41:1022–1028

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • DeSimone LA, Howes BL (1998) Nitrogen transport and transformations in a shallow aquifer receiving wastewater discharge: A mass balance approach. Water Resour Res 34(2):271–285

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Green M, Tarre S, Schnizer M, Bogdan B, Armon R, Shelef G (1994) Groundwater denitrification using an upflow sludge blanket reactor. Water Res 28(3):631–637

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gómez MA, Hontoria E, González-López J (2002) Effect of dissolved oxygen concentration on nitrate removal from groundwater using a denitrifying submerged filter. J Hazard Mater 90:267–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen HCB, Guldberg S, Erbs M, Koch CB (2001) Kinetics of nitrate reduction by green rusts-effects of interlayer anion and Fe(II): Fe(III) ratio. Appl Clay Sci 18:81–91

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Huang CP, Wang HW, Chiu PC (1998) Nitrate reduction by metallic iron. Water Res 32:2257–2264

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hunter WJ (2001) Use of vegetable oil in a pilot-scale denitrifying barrier. J Contam Hydrol 53:119–131

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jha D, Bose P (2005) Use of pyrite for pH control during hydrogenotrophic denitrification using metallic iron as the ultimate electron donor. Chemosphere 61:1020–1031

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kim YS, Nakano K, Lee TJ, Kanchanatawee S, Matsumura M (2002) On-site nitrate removal of groundwater by an immobilized psychrophilic denitrifier using soluble starch as a carbon source. J Biosci Bioeng 93:303–308

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lee JW, Lee KH, Park KY, Maeng SK (2010) Hydrogenotrophic denitrification in a packed bed reactor: effects of hydrogen-to-water flow rate ratio. Bioresour Technol 101:3940–3946

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mergaert J, Boley A, Cnockaert MC, Müller W-R, Swings J (2001) Identity and potential functions of heterotrophic bacterial isolates from a continuous-upflow fixed-bed reactor for denitrification of drinking water with bacterial polyester as source of carbon and electron donor. System Appl Microbiol 24:303–310

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moon HS, Ahn K-H, Lee S, Nam K, Kim JY (2004) Use of autotrophic sulfur-oxidizers to remove nitrate from bank filtrate in a permeable reactive barrier system. Environ Pollut 129:499–507

    Google Scholar 

  • Moon HS, Shin DY, Nam K, Kim JY (2008) A long-term performance test on an autotrophic denitrification column for application as a permeable reactive barrier. Chemosphere 73:723–728

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson WD, Cherry JA (1995) In situ denitrification of septic-system nitrate using reactive porous media barriers: field trials. Ground Water 33(1):99–111

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson WD, Blowes DW, Ptacek CJ, Cherry JA (2000) Long-term performance of in situ reactive barriers for nitrate remediation. Ground Water 38:689–695

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson WD, Vogan JL, Lombardo PS (2008) Nitrate removal rates in a 15-year-old permeable reactive barrier treating septic system nitrate. Ground Water Monit Remediat 28:65–72

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson-Lora MA, Brennan RA (2009) The use of crab-shell chitin for biological denitrification: batch and column tests. Bioresour Technol 100:534–541

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rust CM, Aelion CM, Flora JRV (2000) Control of pH during denitrification in subsurface sediment microcosms using encapsulated phosphate buffer. Water Res 34:1447–1454

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rust CM, Aelion CM, Flora JRV (2002) Laboratory sand column study of encapsulated buffer release for potential in situ pH control. J Contam Hydrol 54:81–98

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Saliling WJB, Westerman PW, Losordo TM (2007) Wood chips and wheat straw as alternative biofilter media for denitrification reactors treating aquaculture and other wastewaters with high nitrate concentrations. Aquacult Eng 37:222–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schipper LA, Vojvodić-Vuković M (1998) Nitrate removal from groundwater using a denitrification wall amended with sawdust: field trial. J Environ Qual 27:664–668

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schipper LA, Barkle GF, Hadfield JC, Vojvodić-Vuković M, Burgess CP (2004) Hydraulic constraints on the performance of a groundwater denitrification wall for nitrate removal from shallow groundwater. J Contam Hydrol 69:263–279

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schipper LA, Barkle GF, Vojvodić-Vuković M (2005) Maximum rates of nitrate removal in a denitrification wall. J Environ Qual 34:1270–1276

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Soares MIM, Abeliovich A (1998) Wheat straw as substrate for water denitrification. Water Res 32:3790–3794

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Soares MIM, Brenner A, Yevzori A, Messalem R, Leroux Y, Abeliovich A (2000) Denitrification of groundwater: pilot-plant testing of cotton-packed bioreactor and post-microfiltration. Wat Sci Technol 42:353–359

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Su C, Puls RW (2007) Removal of added nitrate in cotton burr compost, mulch compost, and peat: mechanisms and potential use for groundwater nitrate remediation. Chemosphere 66:91–98

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sunger N, Bose P (2009) Autotrophic denitrification using hydrogen generated from metallic iron corrosion. Bioresour Technol 100:4077–4082

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Volokita M, Belkin S, Abeliovich A, Soares MIM (1996) Biological denitrification of drinking water using newspaper. Water Res 30:965–971

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Westerhoff P, James J (2003) Nitrate removal in zero-valent iron packed columns. Water Res 37:1818–1830

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yang GCC, Lee HL (2005) Chemical reduction of nitrate by nanosized iron: kinetics and pathways. Water Res 39:884–894

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fei Liu .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Liu, F., Huang, G., Fallowfield, H., Guan, H., Zhu, L., Hu, H. (2014). Heterotrophic-Autotrophic Denitrification Permeable Reactive Barriers. In: Study on Heterotrophic-Autotrophic Denitrification Permeable Reactive Barriers (HAD PRBs) for In Situ Groundwater Remediation. SpringerBriefs in Water Science and Technology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38154-6_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics