Requirements for an Intelligent Ambient Assisted Living Application for Parkinson Patients

  • Millán Arroyo
  • Lucila Finkel
  • Jorge J. Gomez-Sanz
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 365)


Ambient Assisted Living is attracting the attention of researchers not only for dealing with aging, but also to improve the quality of living of people with other circumstances, like those of Parkinson patients. An Ambient Assisted Living system for a Parkinson patient has to consider the particularities of this disease. It mainly involves the alteration of the motor capabilities. There are few studies dealing with the problems of Parkinson Disease and how AAL can alleviate them. Some of these problems are centered in the patient and the disease itself, but others are derived by the patient’s social context, i.e., the place the patient occupies in the society and how the patient relates to other people. The contribution of this paper consists in an enumeration of issues to consider when creating an AAL application for them and it is part of a research project called SociAAL.


software requirements Parkinson disease ambient assisted living 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
  2. 2.
  3. 3.
    Dávila, P., Rubí, E., Mateo, A., et al.: La situación de los enfermos afectados por la enfermedad del parkinson, sus necesidades y sus demandas. Colección Estudios. Serie Dependencia. Nº 12009, Imserso, MadridGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Martignoni, E., et al.: How parkinsonism influences life: the patients’ point of view. Neurol. Sci. 32, 125–131 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Instituto Nacional de Estadística: Encuesta sobre discapacidades, deficiencias y estado de salud (EDDES 1999), Madrid (1999)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Instituto Nacional de Estadística: Encuesta sobre discapacidad, autonomía personal y situaciones de dependencia (EDAD 2008), Madrid (2008)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Anaut-Bravo, S., Méndez-Cano, J.: Relatives and caregivin to people affected with parkinson. Portularia XXI(1), 37–47 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hoehn, M.M., Yahr, M.D.: Parkinsonism, onset, progression and mortality. Neurology 17, 427–442 (1967)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kim, K.S., Kim, K.H., Kim, K.H., et al.: Subjective and objective caregiver burden in parkinson’s disease. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing 37(2), 242–248 (2007)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Davey, C., Wiles, R., Ashburn, A., Murphy, C.: Falling in parkinson disease: the impact on informal caregivers. Disability and Rehabilitation 26(23), 1360–1366 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pérez Peñaranda, A.: El cuidador primario de familiares con dependencia. Universidad de Salamanca, Tesis doctoral. Fac. Medicina (2006)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Burnett, M., Beckwith, L., Wiedenbeck, S., Fleming, S., Cao, J., Park, T.H., Grigoreanu, V., Rector, K.: Gender pluralism in problem-solving software. Interacting with Computers 23(5), 450–460 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lewis, G., Byblow, W.D., Walt, S.E.: Stride length regulation in Parkinson’s disease: the use of extrinsic, visual cues. Brain 123(10), 2077–2090 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cunningham, L.M., Nugent, C.D., Finlay, D.D., Moore, G., Craig, D.: A review of assistive technologies for people with Parkinson’s disease. Technol. Health Care 17(3), 269–279 (2009)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cunningham, L.M., Mason, S.S., Nugent, C.D., Moore, G.G., Finlay, D.D., Craig, D.: Home-Based Monitoring and Assessment of Parkinson’s Disease. IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine 15(1), 47–53 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Constantinescu, R., Leonard, C., Deeley, C., Kurlan, R.: Assistive devices for gait in Parkinson’s disease. Parkinsonism and Related Disorders 13, 133–138 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Vanhooydonck, D., Demeester, E., Hüntemann, A., Philips, J., Vanacker, G., Van Brussel, H., Nuttin, M.: Adaptable navigational assistance for intelligent wheelchairs by means of an implicit personalized user model. Robotics and Autonomous Systems 58(8), 963–977 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Burns, W.P., Nugent, C.D., McCullagh, P.J., Zheng, H., Finlay, D.D., Davies, R.J., Donnelly, M.P., Black, N.D.: Personalisation and configuration of assistive technologies. In: Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (2008)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Skillen, K.-L., Chen, L., Nugent, C.D., Donnelly, M.P., Burns, W., Solheim, I.: Ontological User Profile Modeling for Context-Aware Application Personalization. In: Bravo, J., López-de-Ipiña, D., Moya, F. (eds.) UCAmI 2012. LNCS, vol. 7656, pp. 261–268. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zave, P., Jackson, M.: Four dark corners of requirements engineering. ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. 6(1), 1–30 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sadri, F.: Ambient intelligence: A survey. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR) 43(4), 36 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Van Den Broek, G., Cavallo, F., Wehrmann, C.: AALIANCE Ambient Assisted Living Roadmap. Ambient Intelligence and Smart Environments, vol. 6. IOS Press (2010)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kleinberger, T., Becker, M., Ras, E., Holzinger, A., Müller, P.: Ambient Intelligence in Assisted Living: Enable Elderly People to Handle Future Interfaces. In: Stephanidis, C. (ed.) UAHCI 2007, Part II. LNCS, vol. 4555, pp. 103–112. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Álvarez-García, J.A., Barsocchi, P., Chessa, S., Salvi, D.: Evaluation of localization and activity recognition systems for ambient assisted living: The experience of the 2012 EvAAL competition. JAISE 5(1), 119–132 (2013)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Barrué, C., Cortés, U., Martínez, A.B., Escoda, J., Annicchiarico, R., Caltagirone, C.: e-Tools: An agent coordination layer to support the mobility of persons with disabilities. In: Bramer, M. (ed.) Artificial Intelligence in Theory and Practice. IFIP, vol. 217, pp. 425–434. Springer, Boston (2006)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Tocino, A.V., Calvo Alcalde, A.I., Andrés Gutiérrez, J.J., Álvarez Navia, I., García Peñalvo, F.J., Castrejón, E.P.: MIMO: Multi-Agent System for Personal Health Monitoring. In: Handbook of Research on Developments in E-Health and Telemedicine, Hershey, pp. 827–850Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Fukuda, T., Takagawa, I., Hasegawa, Y.: From intelligent robot to multi-agent robotic system. In: International Conference on Integration of Knowledge Intensive Multi-Agent Systems, pp. 413–417 (2003)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Nehmer, J., Becker, M., Karshmer, A., Lamm, R.: Living assistance systems: An ambient intelligence approach. In: Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE 2006), pp. 43–50. ACM (2006)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Müller, S., Santi, M., Sixsmith, A.: Eliciting user requirements for ambient assisted living, Results of the SOPRANO project. In: eChallenges 2008 Conference, pp. 81–88 (2008)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Millán Arroyo
    • 1
  • Lucila Finkel
    • 1
  • Jorge J. Gomez-Sanz
    • 1
  1. 1.Universidad Complutense de MadridSpain

Personalised recommendations